Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/52001, first published .
Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis

Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis

Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis

Journals

  1. Barrot J. Leveraging Google Gemini as a Research Writing Tool in Higher Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 2024 View
  2. Chou W, Chow J. Enhancing English abstract quality for non-English speaking authors using ChatGPT: A comparative study of Taiwan, Japan, China, and South Korea with slope graphs. Medicine 2024;103(40):e39796 View
  3. Kim H, Yoon P, Yoon J, Kim H, Choi Y, Park S, Moon J. Discrepancies in ChatGPT’s Hip Fracture Recommendations in Older Adults for 2021 AAOS Evidence-Based Guidelines. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024;13(19):5971 View