This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Letters to the Editor (43) Artificial Intelligence (1371) Chatbots and Conversational Agents (531) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (311) Digital Science, Open Science (79)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/50591, first published .
AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

Authors of this article:

Nicholas Liu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Amy Brown2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Májovský M, Mikolov T, Netuka D. AI Is Changing the Landscape of Academic Writing: What Can Be Done? Authors’ Reply to: AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e50844 View
  2. Krausman P, Knipps A. The valuable role of referees. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2024;88(2) View
  3. Bellini V, Semeraro F, Montomoli J, Cascella M, Bignami E. Between human and AI: assessing the reliability of AI text detection tools. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2024;40(3):353 View
  4. Hall R. Generative Artificial Intelligence, Large Language Models, and JID Innovations. JID Innovations 2024;4(2):100256 View
  5. Kim H, Yang J, Chang D, Lenke L, Pizones J, Castelein R, Watanabe K, Trobisch P, Mundis Jr G, Suh S, Suk S. Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e52001 View
  6. Bolaños Guerra B, Morton Gutierrez J. On singularity and the Stoics: why Stoicism offers a valuable approach to navigating the risks of AI (Artificial Intelligence). AI and Ethics 2024 View
  7. Alfirevic Z, Weeks J. Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods 2024;2(8) View
  8. Chein J, Martinez S, Barone A. Human intelligence can safeguard against artificial intelligence: individual differences in the discernment of human from AI texts. Scientific Reports 2024;14(1) View