Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/51584, first published .
Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor

Journals

  1. van Manen M. What Does ChatGPT Mean for Qualitative Health Research?. Qualitative Health Research 2023;33(13):1135 View
  2. Munro L. Are Human Peer Reviewers Still the Bedrock of Scientific Publications?. South African Radiographer 2023;61(2):5 View
  3. Miao J, Thongprayoon C, Suppadungsuk S, Garcia Valencia O, Qureshi F, Cheungpasitporn W. Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review. Clinics and Practice 2023;14(1):89 View
  4. Inam M, Sheikh S, Minhas A, Vaughan E, Krittanawong C, Samad Z, Lavie C, Khoja A, D'Cruze M, Slipczuk L, Alarakhiya F, Naseem A, Haider A, Virani S. A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing. Current Problems in Cardiology 2024;49(3):102387 View
  5. Chen N, Sng B. Ethical Principles of Clinical and Translational Research. Anesthesiology Clinics 2024;42(4):581 View
  6. Ma S, Rohatgi N, Chen J. The promises and limitations of artificial intelligence for quality improvement, patient safety, and research in hospital medicine. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2024 View
  7. Hamed A, Wu X. Detection of ChatGPT fake science with the xFakeSci learning algorithm. Scientific Reports 2024;14(1) View
  8. Laohawetwanit T, Pinto D, Bychkov A. A survey analysis of the adoption of large language models among pathologists. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 2024 View
  9. Levin G, Piedimonte S, Zand B. Navigating the complexities of artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a dual perspective. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2024;34(10):1495 View
  10. Yu H, Fan L, Li L, Zhou J, Ma Z, Xian L, Hua W, He S, Jin M, Zhang Y, Gandhi A, Ma X. Large Language Models in Biomedical and Health Informatics: A Review with Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research 2024;8(4):658 View
  11. Suchikova Y, Tsybuliak N. ChatGPT isn’t an author, but a contribution taxonomy is needed. Accountability in Research 2024:1 View
  12. Silva G, Khera R, Schwamm L, Acampa M, Adelman E, Boltze J, Broderick J, Brodtmann A, Christensen H, Dalli L, Duncan K, Elgendy I, Ergul A, Goldstein L, Hinkle J, Johansen M, Jood K, Kasner S, Levine S, Li Z, Lip G, Marsh E, Muir K, Ospel J, Pera J, Quinn T, Räty S, Ranta A, Richards L, Romero J, Willey J, Hillis A, Veerbeek J. Reviewer Experience Detecting and Judging Human Versus Artificial Intelligence Content: The Stroke Journal Essay Contest. Stroke 2024;55(10):2573 View
  13. Buvat I, Weber W. Is ChatGPT a Reliable Ghostwriter?. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2024;65(10):1499 View
  14. Hu J, Li C, Ge Y, Yang J, Zhu S, He C. Mapping the Evolution of Digital Health Research: Bibliometric Overview of Research Hotspots, Trends, and Collaboration of Publications in JMIR (1999-2024). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e58987 View
  15. Gawlik-Kobylińska M. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Scientific Collaboration: Insights from Students and Educational Implications. Education Sciences 2024;14(10):1132 View
  16. Ou P, Wen R, Deng L, Shi L, Liang H, Wang J, Liu C. Exploring the changing landscape of medical imaging: insights from highly cited studies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Radiology 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Thiga M. Facilitating Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education With Generative AI. View