This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Recruitment of Research Participants (296) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (955) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (573) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (479) Innovations in Clinical Trials and Research Data Management (83) New Methods (944) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832) Methods in Human Factors Research (42) Cardiology (159)

Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/54867, first published .
Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Anna G M Zondag1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marieke J Hollestelle2 Author Orcid Image ;   Rieke van der Graaf2 Author Orcid Image ;   Hendrik M Nathoe3 Author Orcid Image ;   Wouter W van Solinge1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michiel L Bots2 Author Orcid Image ;   Robin W M Vernooij2, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Saskia Haitjema1 Author Orcid Image ;   UCC-CVRM study group5
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

There are no citations yet available for this article according to Crossref .