This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Recruitment of Research Participants (280) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (914) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (542) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (457) Innovations in Clinical Trials and Research Data Management (73) New Methods (909) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (788) Methods in Human Factors Research (38) Cardiology (130)

Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/54867, first published .
Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Anna G M Zondag1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marieke J Hollestelle2 Author Orcid Image ;   Rieke van der Graaf2 Author Orcid Image ;   Hendrik M Nathoe3 Author Orcid Image ;   Wouter W van Solinge1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michiel L Bots2 Author Orcid Image ;   Robin W M Vernooij2, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Saskia Haitjema1 Author Orcid Image ;   UCC-CVRM study group5
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

Anna G M Zondag   1 , MSc ;   Marieke J Hollestelle   2 , PhD ;   Rieke van der Graaf   2 , PhD ;   Hendrik M Nathoe   3 , MD, PhD ;   Wouter W van Solinge   1 , PhD ;   Michiel L Bots   2 , MD, PhD ;   Robin W M Vernooij   2, 4 , PhD ;   Saskia Haitjema   1 , MD, PhD ;   UCC-CVRM study group   5

1 Central Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

2 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

3 Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

4 Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

5 See Acknowledgements

Corresponding Author:

  • Anna G M Zondag, MSc
  • Central Diagnostic Laboratory
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Utrecht University
  • Heidelberglaan 100
  • Utrecht, 3584 CX
  • Netherlands
  • Phone: 31 631117922
  • Email: a.g.m.zondag@umcutrecht.nl