This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Artificial Intelligence (1371) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (311) Epublishing and Open Access (86) Reviews in Medical Education (57) New Methods and Approaches in Medical Education (232) Methods and Instruments in Medical Informatics (126) Chatbots and Conversational Agents (531)

Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/53164, first published .
Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis

Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis

Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis

Authors of this article:

Mikaël Chelli1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jules Descamps2 Author Orcid Image ;   Vincent Lavoué1 Author Orcid Image ;   Christophe Trojani1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michel Azar1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marcel Deckert3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jean-Luc Raynier1 Author Orcid Image ;   Gilles Clowez1 Author Orcid Image ;   Pascal Boileau1 Author Orcid Image ;   Caroline Ruetsch-Chelli3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (9) Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.