Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/46924, first published .
Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened

Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened

Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened

Journals

  1. Ballester P. Open Science and Software Assistance: Commentary on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e49323 View
  2. Bignami E, Montomoli J, Bellini V, Cascella M. Uncovering the power of synergy: a hybrid human–machine model for maximizing AI properties and human expertise. Critical Care 2023;27(1) View
  3. Leung T, de Azevedo Cardoso T, Mavragani A, Eysenbach G. Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e51584 View
  4. Hu J, Liu F, Chu C, Chang Y. Health Care Trainees’ and Professionals’ Perceptions of ChatGPT in Improving Medical Knowledge Training: Rapid Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e49385 View
  5. Moise A, Centomo-Bozzo A, Orishchak O, Alnoury M, Daniel S. Can ChatGPT Guide Parents on Tympanostomy Tube Insertion?. Children 2023;10(10):1634 View
  6. Lombardo R, Cicione A, Santoro G, De Nunzio C. ChatGPT in prostate cancer: myth or reality?. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 2024;27(1):9 View
  7. Velásquez-Henao J, Franco-Cardona C, Cadavid-Higuita L. Prompt Engineering: a methodology for optimizing interactions with AI-Language Models in the field of engineering. DYNA 2023;90(230):9 View
  8. Li W, Lu W, Gong Z. Harnessing the Potential of ChatGPT in Breast Reconstruction: A Revolution in Patient Communication and Education. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2024;48(1):35 View
  9. Liu N, Brown A. AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e50591 View
  10. Kuroiwa T, Sarcon A, Ibara T, Yamada E, Yamamoto A, Tsukamoto K, Fujita K. The Potential of ChatGPT as a Self-Diagnostic Tool in Common Orthopedic Diseases: Exploratory Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e47621 View
  11. Lozić E, Štular B. Fluent but Not Factual: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Other AI Chatbots’ Proficiency and Originality in Scientific Writing for Humanities. Future Internet 2023;15(10):336 View
  12. Odri G, Yoon D. Détection d’intelligence artificielle générative dans les articles scientifiques : techniques d’évasion et implications pour l’intégrité scientifique. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 2023;109(8):1103 View
  13. Hussein S, Khalifa A. Artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT involvement in orthopaedic research activities, the good, the bad, and the Ugly. Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal 2023;58(3):149 View
  14. Relf M. Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Publishing. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care 2023;34(4):329 View
  15. Hwang S, Lim J, Lee R, Matsui Y, Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Ahn H. Is ChatGPT a “Fire of Prometheus” for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing?. Korean Journal of Radiology 2023;24(10):952 View
  16. Rigberg D, Jim J. Considerations for the application of artificial intelligence in vascular surgical education. Seminars in Vascular Surgery 2023;36(3):471 View
  17. Taloni A, Scorcia V, Giannaccare G. Modern threats in academia: evaluating plagiarism and artificial intelligence detection scores of ChatGPT. Eye 2024;38(2):397 View
  18. Májovský M, Mikolov T, Netuka D. AI Is Changing the Landscape of Academic Writing: What Can Be Done? Authors’ Reply to: AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e50844 View
  19. Jacques T, Sleiman R, Diaz M, Dartus J. Artificial intelligence: Emergence and possible fraudulent use in medical publishing. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2023;109(8):103709 View
  20. Jacques T, Sleiman R, Diaz M, Dartus J. Intelligence artificielle : émergence et possible utilisation frauduleuse dans l’édition médicale. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 2023;109(8):1081 View
  21. Ahaley S, Pandey A, Juneja S, Gupta T, Vijayakumar S. ChatGPT in medical writing: A game-changer or a gimmick?. Perspectives in Clinical Research 2023 View
  22. Hernandez C, Vazquez Gonzalez A, Polianovskaia A, Amoro Sanchez R, Muyolema Arce V, Mustafa A, Vypritskaya E, Perez Gutierrez O, Bashir M, Eighaei Sedeh A. The Future of Patient Education: AI-Driven Guide for Type 2 Diabetes. Cureus 2023 View
  23. Sallam M, Barakat M, Sallam M. Pilot Testing of a Tool to Standardize the Assessment of the Quality of Health Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Models. Cureus 2023 View
  24. Wiecha P. Deep learning for nano-photonic materials – The solution to everything!?. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 2024;28:101129 View
  25. Blacker S, Kang M, Chakraborty I, Chowdhury T, Williams J, Lewis C, Zimmer M, Wilson B, Lele A. Utilizing Artificial Intelligence and Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer to Answer Questions About Clinical Scenarios in Neuroanesthesiology. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology 2023 View
  26. Krausman P, Knipps A. The valuable role of referees. The Journal of Wildlife Management 2024;88(2) View
  27. Cheng S, Tsai S, Bai Y, Ko C, Hsu C, Yang F, Tsai C, Tu Y, Yang S, Tseng P, Hsu T, Liang C, Su K. Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e51229 View
  28. Tangadulrat P, Sono S, Tangtrakulwanich B. Using ChatGPT for Clinical Practice and Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Students’ and Physicians’ Perceptions. JMIR Medical Education 2023;9:e50658 View
  29. Sethuraman K. Best Practices for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors. International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research 2023;10(2):61 View
  30. Khalifa A, Ibrahim M. Artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT involvement in scientific and medical writing, a new concern for researchers. A scoping review. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research 2024 View
  31. Inam M, Sheikh S, Minhas A, Vaughan E, Krittanawong C, Samad Z, Lavie C, Khoja A, D'Cruze M, Slipczuk L, Alarakhiya F, Naseem A, Haider A, Virani S. A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing. Current Problems in Cardiology 2024;49(3):102387 View
  32. Yang Z, Wu J, Xie H. Taming Frankenstein’s monster: Ethical considerations relating to generative artificial intelligence in education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 2024:1 View
  33. Siegel M, Rossi M, Lubowitz J. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning May Resolve Health Care Information Overload. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 2024 View
  34. Hatia A, Doldo T, Parrini S, Chisci E, Cipriani L, Montagna L, Lagana G, Guenza G, Agosta E, Vinjolli F, Hoxha M, D’Amelio C, Favaretto N, Chisci G. Accuracy and Completeness of ChatGPT-Generated Information on Interceptive Orthodontics: A Multicenter Collaborative Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024;13(3):735 View
  35. Almagazzachi A, Mustafa A, Eighaei Sedeh A, Vazquez Gonzalez A, Polianovskaia A, Abood M, Abdelrahman A, Muyolema Arce V, Acob T, Saleem B. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education: ChatGPT Takes on Hypertension Questions. Cureus 2024 View
  36. Hwang T, Aggarwal N, Khan P, Roberts T, Mahmood A, Griffiths M, Parsons N, Khan S, Mizuno T. Can ChatGPT assist authors with abstract writing in medical journals? Evaluating the quality of scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT and original abstracts. PLOS ONE 2024;19(2):e0297701 View
  37. Narula P, Deoghare R. Evaluation of ChatGPT responses for back pain?. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 2024 View
  38. Yan C, Grabowska M, Dickson A, Li B, Wen Z, Roden D, Michael Stein C, Embí P, Peterson J, Feng Q, Malin B, Wei W. Leveraging generative AI to prioritize drug repurposing candidates for Alzheimer’s disease with real-world clinical validation. npj Digital Medicine 2024;7(1) View
  39. Smyk W, Adrych K, Krawczyk M. Artificial replication cohort: Leveraging AI‐fabricated data for genetic studies. Liver International 2024 View