This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (1289) Reviews (100) Artificial Intelligence (1371) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1407)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

This is a member publication of University College London (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/39742, first published .
Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence

Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence

Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence

Authors of this article:

Henry David Jeffry Hogg1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Mohaimen Al-Zubaidy1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Technology Enhanced Macular Services Study Reference Group1 ;   James Talks2 Author Orcid Image ;   Alastair K Denniston4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Christopher J Kelly6 Author Orcid Image ;   Johann Malawana7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   Chrysanthi Papoutsi9 Author Orcid Image ;   Marion Dawn Teare1 Author Orcid Image ;   Pearse A Keane3, 10 Author Orcid Image ;   Fiona R Beyer11 Author Orcid Image ;   Gregory Maniatopoulos1, 12 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (35) Tweetations (8) Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.