Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

New Methods (1204) Epublishing and Open Access (109) Scientometrics, Infometrics, and Altmetrics (131) Digital Health Reporting Standards, Quality and Transparency in e-Research (164) Digital Science, Open Science (96) Data Science (408) AI for Writing and Research Communication (26) Tools and Software for Metascience and Research Integrity Research (25)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35568, first published .
Hand selecting the fifth star in a five-star rating system.

Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study

Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study

Authors of this article:

Simon Šuster1 Author Orcid Image ;   Timothy Baldwin1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jey Han Lau1 Author Orcid Image ;   Antonio Jimeno Yepes1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   David Martinez Iraola4 Author Orcid Image ;   Yulia Otmakhova1 Author Orcid Image ;   Karin Verspoor3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (11) Metrics

Journals

  1. Jin Q, Leaman R, Lu Z. PubMed and beyond: biomedical literature search in the age of artificial intelligence. eBioMedicine 2024;100:104988 View
  2. Wang D, Wang Q, Wang Y, Li T, Tian M. Effects of acupuncture and moxibustion on ulcerative colitis: An overview of systematic reviews. Heliyon 2024;10(6):e27524 View
  3. Budau L, Ensan F. Fully Automated Scholarly Search for Biomedical Systematic Literature Reviews. IEEE Access 2024;12:83764 View
  4. Schiekiera L, Diederichs J, Niemeyer H. Classifying Positive Results in Clinical Psychology Using Natural Language Processing. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2024;232(3):147 View
  5. Lieberum J, Toews M, Metzendorf M, Heilmeyer F, Siemens W, Haverkamp C, Böhringer D, Meerpohl J, Eisele-Metzger A. Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2025;181:111746 View
  6. Wu J, Guyatt G, Yao L. Efficiency must not compromise trustworthiness in rating certainty and formulating recommendations in AI era. BMJ 2025;389:r1105 View
  7. Wang Z, Cao L, Danek B, Jin Q, Lu Z, Sun J. Accelerating clinical evidence synthesis with large language models. npj Digital Medicine 2025;8(1) View
  8. Mao Z, Chen J. Comprehensive Pediatric Health Risk Stratification Using an AI-Driven Framework in Children Aged 2 to 8 Years: Design and Validation Study. JMIR Medical Informatics 2026;14:e80163 View
  9. Oami T, Okada Y, Nakada T. Automated systematic reviews using machine learning and large language models in clinical practice guideline development: A perspective. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine 2026;33(1) View
  10. Zhang Y, Liu H, Jiang G, Xu S, Song Y, Han D, Liu Y. Evaluation of randomized controlled trial literature in traditional Chinese medicine: a literature quality assessment system. Trials 2026;27(1) View
  11. Erstad B. Real-Time Evaluation of a Large Language Model for Clinical Practice Guideline Development. Critical Care Explorations 2026;8(5):e1409 View
  12. Aldalou M, Brooks W, Rush E, Landry‐Wegener B, Bills C, Cook D, Swope J, Wilson A. Using Generative AI to Appraise the Quality of Medical Education Research Studies: Agreement Between AI‐Generated and Human MERSQI Scores. AEM Education and Training 2026;10(3) View