This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

New Methods (944) Scientometrics, Infometrics, and Altmetrics (94) Data Science (270) Digital Health Reporting Standards, Quality and Transparency in e-Research (71) Digital Science, Open Science (79) Epublishing and Open Access (86)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35568, first published .
Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study

Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study

Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study

Authors of this article:

Simon Šuster1 Author Orcid Image ;   Timothy Baldwin1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jey Han Lau1 Author Orcid Image ;   Antonio Jimeno Yepes1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   David Martinez Iraola4 Author Orcid Image ;   Yulia Otmakhova1 Author Orcid Image ;   Karin Verspoor3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (12) Metrics

Journals

  1. Jin Q, Leaman R, Lu Z. PubMed and beyond: biomedical literature search in the age of artificial intelligence. eBioMedicine 2024;100:104988 View
  2. Wang D, Wang Q, Wang Y, Li T, Tian M. Effects of acupuncture and moxibustion on ulcerative colitis: An overview of systematic reviews. Heliyon 2024;10(6):e27524 View
  3. Budau L, Ensan F. Fully Automated Scholarly Search for Biomedical Systematic Literature Reviews. IEEE Access 2024;12:83764 View
  4. Schiekiera L, Diederichs J, Niemeyer H. Classifying Positive Results in Clinical Psychology Using Natural Language Processing. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2024;232(3):147 View