This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Scientometrics, Infometrics, and Altmetrics (123) Epublishing and Open Access (104) Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science (513) Digital Science, Open Science (91) Digital Health Reporting Standards, Quality and Transparency in e-Research (132) Digital Health Reviews (1724) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (654)

Published on in Vol 27 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/59598, first published .
Evaluation and Comparison of the Academic Quality of Open-Access Mega Journals and Authoritative Journals: Disruptive Innovation Evaluation

Evaluation and Comparison of the Academic Quality of Open-Access Mega Journals and Authoritative Journals: Disruptive Innovation Evaluation

Evaluation and Comparison of the Academic Quality of Open-Access Mega Journals and Authoritative Journals: Disruptive Innovation Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Yuyan Jiang1 Author Orcid Image ;   Xue-li Liu1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Liyun Wang1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Jiang Y, Ma J. Are Nature Index journals a valid basis for academic assessment: a study of academic impact and disruptive innovation assessment based on open bibliographic metadata and citation data. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2025;12(1) View
  2. Yang X, Liu X, Zhang Z, Xi M, Jiang Y. Do cover papers have higher disruption and citations? Evidence from Nature and Science. Scientometrics 2025;130(11):6727 View