This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Theme Issue 2024: 25 Years of Digital Health Excellence (21) Viewpoints and Perspectives (505) Health Services Research (453) E-Health / Health Services Research and New Models of Care (501) Clinical Informatics (971) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1368) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (695) Social Determinants of Health (27)

Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/60081, first published .
Primary Care Informatics: Vitalizing the Bedrock of Health Care

Primary Care Informatics: Vitalizing the Bedrock of Health Care

Primary Care Informatics: Vitalizing the Bedrock of Health Care

Authors of this article:

Jacqueline Guan-Ting You1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Tiffany I Leung3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Deepti Pandita5 Author Orcid Image ;   Matthew Sakumoto6 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

    Viewpoint

    1Clinical Informatics, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, MA, United States

    2Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States

    3Department of Internal Medicine (adjunct), Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, United States

    4JMIR Publications, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada

    5Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States

    6Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Matthew Sakumoto, MD

    Department of Medicine

    University of California San Francisco

    533 Parnassus Avenue, U127

    San Francisco, CA, 94143

    United States

    Phone: 1 4154761000

    Email: matthew.sakumoto@ucsf.edu


    Primary care informatics (PCI) professionals address workflow and technology solutions in a wide spectrum of health, ranging from optimizing the experience of the individual patient in the clinic room to supporting the health of populations and augmenting the work of frontline primary care clinical teams. PCI overlaps uniquely with 2 disciplines with an impact on societal health—primary care and health informatics. Primary care is a gateway to health care access and aims to synthesize and coordinate numerous, complex elements of patients’ health and medical care in a holistic manner. However, over the past 25 years, primary care has become a specialty in crisis: in a post–COVID-19 world, workforce shortages, clinician burnout, and continuing challenges in health care access all contribute to difficulties in sustaining primary care. Informatics professionals are poised to change this trajectory. In this viewpoint, we aim to inform readers of the discipline of PCI and its importance in the design, support, and maintenance of essential primary care services. Although this work focuses on primary care in the United States, which includes general internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics (and depending on definition, includes specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology), many of the principles outlined can also be applied to comparable health care services and settings in other countries. We highlight (1) common global challenges in primary care, (2) recent trends in the evolution of PCI (personalized medicine, population health, social drivers of health, and team-based care), and (3) opportunities to move forward PCI with current and emerging technologies using the 4Cs of primary care framework. In summary, PCI offers important contributions to health care and the informatics field, and there are many opportunities for informatics professionals to enhance the primary care experience for patients, families, and their care teams.

    J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e60081

    doi:10.2196/60081

    Keywords

    health care delivery; primary care; primary health care; primary prevention; quality of health care; holistic care; holistic medicine; people-centric care; person-centric care; medical informatics applications; primary care informatics; medical informatics; health informatics; information science; data science 


    Introduction to Primary Care

    Primary care is defined by the World Health Organization as “a model of care that supports first-contact, accessible, continuous, comprehensive and coordinated person-focused care” while achieving equitable access to care and emphasizing population health [1]. Primary care is one of the only sections of health care shown to have positive impacts on health outcomes and population health, emphasizing its fundamental role in the health and well-being of the public [2]. Primary care specialties can include internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics [3,4]; some definitions also include obstetrics and gynecology [5,6].

    Primary care is the backbone of health care and is crucial to the health of populations. One international survey indicates that about 75% of respondents had a usual source of primary care [7]. Recent US data indicate that 55% of public insurance (Medicaid) beneficiaries primarily visited primary care clinicians and 36% of patients predominantly visited specialists [8]. Having a usual source of care, such as primary care, is associated with increased preventive screenings such as blood pressure measurements and diabetes and cholesterol screening [7]. Access to primary care has been correlated with lower avoidable hospitalization rates [9]. Loss of primary care has been associated with increased utilization of specialty, urgent care, and emergency care among older adults [10].

    Stange et al [11] refer to primary care as an essential bridge between the health of individuals and population health, “situated at the unsettled boundary region between the messy but meaningful lives of individuals, families, and communities, and the health care, public health, and social systems designed to support them.” Areas where primary care can collaborate with public health and play a role in population health include but are not limited to chronic disease management, communicable diseases, and maternal-child health [12]. This role as a mediator also includes facilitating care with medical specialists and social services [13]. Because of its unique position in facilitating numerous interactions between different parties, primary care serves as a central hub for various data streams and care workflows; informatics solutions in this discipline therefore must match the field’s unique needs.

    Introduction to Primary Care Informatics

    Primary care informatics (PCI) augments the crucial work that primary care provides to populations. In 2003, the Primary Care Informatics Working Group under the American Medical Informatics Association defined PCI as the “application of information technology to improve the practice, education, and research of primary care, and the development of informatics tools appropriate for primary care practice” [14]. At the time, PCI was emerging globally to address the use of technology in areas such as chronic disease management. de Lusignan [15] argued that PCI was not just a discipline of technology but rather a “science” dedicated to the promotion of “patient-centered primary medical care” with a biopsychosocial model of health; PCI was distinct from other areas of health informatics due to the use of heuristics-based clinical management and patient-centered consultations. The Primary Care Informatics Working Group of the International Medical Informatics Association was formed in the early 2000s [15], with the aims of addressing real-world primary care data and ontologies for research; technology integration in primary care; and ethical, legal, and social issues related to primary care [16].

    PCI professionals bring unique expertise at the nexus of primary care and informatics, well before the COVID-19 pandemic. We define PCI professionals as inclusive of clinicians, researchers, technology professionals, experts, and others who engage in PCI. A few examples of PCI issues included the impact of electronic health records (EHRs) on primary care [17-19], benefits of health information exchanges in primary care [20], evidence on health care workers’ perceptions of mobile health in primary care [21], and risks and benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) in primary care [22]. The COVID-19 pandemic put a spotlight on the central role of primary care clinicians globally to mobilize and continue to provide access to care and public health care services to populations all over the world during lockdowns and additional restrictions. PCI professionals rapidly deployed and scaled up telehealth visits and identified and addressed inequities in the digital divide (such as those due to internet access) [23]. Telehealth and telemedicine positively impacted primary care by providing improvements in key areas including continuity, accessibility, care coordination, comprehensiveness, access, better appointment times, and efficiency [24]. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, additional opportunities were highlighted to further strengthen systems, including vaccination and disease prevention, disease management, public health surveillance, and pandemic preparedness [25].

    In this viewpoint paper, we highlight issues uniquely serviced by PCI, distinct from health informatics as a whole, discussing aspects of PCI that have evolved since the early 2000s to mark the 25th anniversary of JMIR Publications and the Journal of Medical Internet Research. In particular, in the wake of COVID-19, there have been changes to primary care practice pertinent to PCI, including challenges to clinician well-being and digital health transformation in domains such as telehealth [26].


    Challenges may vary for different regions of the same country; for example, in the United States, access to primary care for adults [27,28] and pediatric patients [28] is more challenging in rural than urban settings. Differences in primary care worldwide range from physician consultation time [29] to funding and structure [30]. Countries and geographic regions have different needs in primary care—for example, Japan has universal health care and an aging population with challenges around chronic disease management [31], while in sub-Saharan Africa, the disease burden consists of both chronic diseases as well as infectious diseases [32]. In many primary care practices, unlike most specialties, outcomes are addressed at both the individual patient and population levels; at times, these perspectives are not always aligned, for example, when individual values or beliefs may differ from the population or public health recommendations, or when guidelines do not fit a patient’s clinical presentation or health conditions. Yet, the responsibility of addressing these differences in shared decision-making can fall to primary care clinicians to reconcile with patients.

    A recent report on US primary care identified the lack of usability and interoperability of digital health tools as barriers to health care organizations and clinicians unlocking the full possibilities of health information technology—“real potentials of digital health to aggregate a wide array of medical, environmental, biological, and social data; make meaningful sense of information; automate care; make care proactive and not reactive; enhance health equity; and enable population health monitoring and management have been barely explored” [2]. Similarly, recent international physician survey data suggest the majority of primary care physicians are not able to adequately coordinate care with specialists and hospitals [33], in part due to poor data access and communication, a gap that PCI professionals can help address.

    Also, there are troubling themes in recent primary care challenges that cross borders, such as clinician burnout [34], aging populations [31], chronic disease prevalence [32], significant administrative work [35], and mismatch of patient demand and clinician supply [32], which in turn threaten the health of communities globally. However, the authors are optimistic that greater awareness of the opportunities and changes possible through intentional applications of PCI, building on the last 25 years of evidence-based advancements and development in the field, can pave the way forward for continued primary care, and consequently, overall health system improvements. The authors share perspectives reflecting their current and prior primary care experience in the United States, Europe, and Asia, although they expect that some themes described may be applicable to certain health care systems and settings elsewhere.


    Overview

    PCI has evolved to address some of these new challenges. de Lusignan [15] highlighted 3 core areas of PCI, including heuristic decision-making, patient-centered care, and the biopsychosocial model. Building on the principles de Lusignan [15] highlighted, recent trends in primary care with PCI at its core include personalized medicine, analytics- and data-driven population health, social drivers of health, and team-based care. Heuristic-based care is now bolstered by point-of-care analytics and data-driven decisions derived from population health analytics; patient-centered care is informed by personalized medicine; and the biopsychosocial model is strengthened by improved awareness and screening of social determinants. The planted seeds of PCI in the early 2000s have grown and flourished with new technologies and new models of primary care.

    Personalized Medicine, Augmented Personalized Decision-Making, and Customization of Care

    Primary care clinicians often engage in shared decision-making—described in one model as a four-step process of (1) recognizing the opportunity to make a decision with patient and clinician, (2) introducing a decision aid, (3) having a conversation, and (4) receiving care [36]. This decision-making allows for more personalized and arguably patient-centered care. Personalized medicine has the potential to provide new resources and tools to facilitate shared decision-making.

    The growth of genetics knowledge has offered new opportunities to consider how genomic medicine may potentially be integrated into primary care—for example, a real-world pilot with large gene sequencing panels in primary care [37] versus the integration of genetics counselors into primary care teams [38]. Furthermore, the nexus of precision medicine and AI will enable improved care—such as more precise medication dosing, improved treatment recommendations based on comorbidities, or improved risk prediction for diseases [39]—areas in which PCI professionals can inform research and subsequent practical implementation. AI also has the potential to blur the lines between personalized medicine and population health—for example, with precision population analytics, creating “precision cohorts” similar to a primary care clinician’s patients can help better inform which treatment option to use based on population-level data [40].

    Digital health tools, such as wearables and mobile health apps, can provide patient-centered insights and shift primary care toward proactive yet targeted “precision prevention” [41]. These technologies can drive customized care with shared decision-making and allow primary care to pivot toward primary prevention and not just chronic disease management. Along with the personalized treatment of health conditions, patients are better able to customize their care experience; patients are more empowered to access care flexibly outside of brick-and-mortar clinics through mediums such as telehealth [42] and patient portal messages [43].

    Population-Based Approach Driven by Big Data and Analytics

    Primary care is uniquely positioned to become a potential hub for better management of the vast amounts of unused health care data across clinical settings. Each hospital produces an average of 50 petabytes of data annually with an estimated 97% of data remaining unused [44]. EHRs, wearables, and other technologies have expanded modalities [45] and the volume of health data [46]. Health information exchanges can augment the data of individual systems, powering descriptive, predictive, and prescriptive analytics to facilitate quality, improved risk management and clinical decision-making at the population level [47]. Primary care, where longitudinal chronic care and multidisease management take place, can be a vital central hub for patient and population health data. Wagner’s [48] widely adopted chronic care model includes information systems as a core component of providing high-quality chronic disease care. Data-driven improvement using computer-based systems is also considered a building block for a high-performing primary care practice [49]. While extensive research on predictive machine learning has been performed in areas such as cardiac disease, mental health, communicable diseases, and perinatal outcomes, work needs to be done to take into account model usability in the real world [50], as well as practical considerations such as external validation for pragmatic clinical decision-making [51].

    Furthermore, as technologies, like generative AI, are implemented across health care [52,53], PCI professionals have and continue to lead the charge in steering the primary care and informatics communities toward equitable [54-56] and ethical [57] approaches to implementing these technologies. For example, experts spanning PCI, policy, bioethics, and philosophy for the largest US medical specialty organization [58] recently called for ethical, accountable, equitable, transparent, and environmentally aware use of AI in health care [59]. PCI professionals can advocate for appropriate safeguards balanced with clinically reasonable regulations to avoid some of the pitfalls associated with current EHR administrative work [60].

    Population health can encompass chronic disease management—examples of PCI initiatives in this area include chronic care management and remote patient monitoring programs, which provide continuous support across the care continuum [61]. Remote patient monitoring is most often applied in chronic disease management for cardiology, endocrinology, pulmonary, and geriatrics care [62]; beyond expanding the interface modalities and underlying AI models [63] powering this technology, PCI can add value by improving the patient and clinician experience with these technologies [64]. Even as analytics and associated technologies for addressing population health continue to evolve, PCI professionals can help ground these technologies in a sociotechnical design or implementation approach with appropriate outcome measures (such as patient-reported outcome measures) [65].

    Social Drivers of Health

    As part of comprehensive, culturally sensitive, and patient-centered care, PCI professionals address social determinants of health (SDOH), also referred to as social drivers of health, in EHR design or improvements [66-68]. SDOH includes areas such as education, food, housing, income, and other nonmedical factors that contribute to health [69]. Recent attention to these drivers has advanced the traditional biopsychosocial model of care. The longitudinal relationship of patients with primary care clinicians, as opposed to the episodic nature of other specialties, allows for greater patient trust in disclosing SDOH information during primary care visits. Documenting and visualizing SDOH gaps increases the likelihood of addressing these factors that greatly impact patients’ well-being [70]. PCI professionals can identify and present resources to both patient and clinician, matching the right intervention with the right patient to maximize benefit to the patient and community.

    Other examples of relevant determinants within SDOH also include commercial determinants of health (industry entities shaping health choices in areas such as food, alcohol, tobacco use, pharmaceuticals, and media consumption) [71,72]; political determinants of health (sociopolitical events correlating with disparities in health outcomes) [73]; and geographic location (using geographical information systems to measure disease incidence and prevalence, health risk, community access to health services, and community health profiling) [74]. In addition, health informatics researchers and PCI professionals play a role in addressing immigrant and refugee health, for example, in building appropriate record systems to accommodate the international needs of this vulnerable population [75]. There is a significant intersection between PCI and the emerging field of social informatics [66], which deals with data from a breadth of sources to advance social and medical care. Furthermore, as PCI implements patient-facing solutions (eg, in digital health), the field should aim for meaningful, equitable solutions built on community engagement [76], which can allow for culturally relevant informatics tools that engage and advocate for underrepresented populations [77].

    Informatics to Enable Dynamic, Flexible Team-Based Care

    Primary care teams can vary in composition but can include nurses, medical assistants, health coaches, behavioral health specialists, and pharmacists supporting primary care providers, often coupled with clinical workflows such as standing orders or protocols [78]. There is evidence that these team members can provide effective care in particular areas of primary care; for example, primary care nurses provide effective care in areas such as chronic disease management, care management, and health promotion [79]. Team-based primary care has been correlated with improved quality measures, such as depression and diabetes care adherence, and reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations [80]. This team-based care is a key component of care management, supporting higher-risk patients with better disease management and care navigation; care management in turn is vital to promoting value-based-care—care that is patient-centered and improves clinical outcomes while avoiding unnecessary costs [81].

    Health information technology has been shown to be an important part of effective team-based primary care. [82] For example, the advanced team-based care model integrates technology into a care team model with enhanced clinical workflows and roles, including a care team coordinator whose responsibilities include history taking during clinic visits, coordination of preventive health screenings, clinician-supervised laboratory test or order placement and documentation; this model improves patient outcomes such as cervical cancer screening and immunizations and allows physicians or advanced practice providers to focus on communication, clinical decision-making, and management of a greater number of health issues [83]. PCI professionals also can introduce new tools to team-based care such as secure messaging for interprofessional communication [84,85]. With increases in telehealth since the COVID-19 pandemic, PCI professionals have been core to establishing new care team models specific to telehealth, taking into account teams that are often remotely located [86].


    Overview

    A broad range of digital health interventions for prevention in primary care exist, ranging from EHR-based solutions to telehealth, that have proven efficacy but have not been widely adopted or are primarily clinician facing [87,88]. We break down current and future state technologies that have the potential to transform the primary care experience.

    We apply the 4Cs of primary care (alternatively known as the 4 tenets or 4 pillars of primary care) framework [89,90] to different domains and tasks encountered in primary care and map these domains and tasks to health informatics tools (Table 1). Some of these domains may encompass multiple pillars.

    Table 1. 4Cs of primary care, primary care domains and tasks, and corresponding informatics tools or aspects.
    4 Cs of primary care and primary care domain or taskHealth informatics tools or aspects
    Contact

    		Patient engagement and patient educationMobile health apps, text messaging, telehealth, medical extended reality, personal health records, patient portals
    Comprehensiveness

    		Chronic disease managementRemote patient monitoring, EHRa design, telehealth visits, mobile health

    		Population health managementClinical decision support, machine learning analytics, disease registries

    		Social determinants of healthClinical decision support, EHR design
    Coordination

    		Care team or clinician-clinician coordinationInteroperability, EHR design, electronic consults

    		Documentation or administrative tasksAmbient listening documentation, generative AIb chart summarization

    		Population health managementPrecision population analytics, predictive analytics, health information exchange

    		Collaboration with public healthData aggregation, interoperability, data reporting, learning health systems
    Continuity

    		Patient-clinician communicationPatient portal messaging, telehealth

    aEHR: electronic health record.

    bAI: artificial intelligence.

    Contact

    The first C, contact, refers to patients accessing primary care services. With the necessitated movement to telemedicine and telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth adoption among certain patients was rapid [91]. After the pandemic, there is much work to be done to address gaps in telehealth access, especially among those of lower socioeconomic status [42].

    Health care systems must rethink how individuals access health care, and PCI practitioners are poised to bridge gaps in access and creatively engage patients in care. Text messaging for medication adherence in chronic diseases [92] and mobile health have engaged patients with chronic health conditions [93,94]. On the other hand, medical extended reality is a growing field overlapping with clinical informatics; its applications span from behavioral health to integration with procedural specialties [95]. Patient education is a key component of primary care visits; virtual reality has been studied for patient education [96], and in the future, could be a tool in PCI for patient education and engagement. Deep learning can also improve patient instructions by “translating” language to an appropriate reading or health literacy level [97]. While benchmarking suggests large language models’ multilingual functions do not perform well enough compared to commercial translation services [98], large language models could someday create high-quality multilingual patient education materials.

    Comprehensiveness

    The second C, comprehensiveness, refers to patient-centered management of the breadth of conditions and a balance of prevention and treatment.

    To provide comprehensive care, primary care clinicians and other care team members must be able to find the right information for the right patient (or even groups of patients) at the right time. Interoperable and usable EHRs are key to timely and appropriate data access. However, current EHR usability is often poor and associated with clinician burnout [99]. Similarly, a recent survey of US family physicians demonstrates poor satisfaction with interoperability in primary care [100]. PCI professionals, in collaboration with experts in these domains, can help facilitate improved clinical workflows, data infrastructure, and user-friendly designs to advance comprehensive care.

    PCI professionals can also augment population health management, where clinical decision support has been shown to positively impact screenings for cancer, infectious diseases, and cardiovascular risk factors [101]. Health information management systems through health information exchanges have been associated with better care outcomes [102]; data analytics in primary care are correlated with decreased emergency department visits and increased care engagement [103]. Disease registries, such as those for chronic kidney disease [104], can assist primary care teams in better managing chronic diseases at a population level. Other digital health interventions can help with preventive care, such as immunization and cancer screening, and improve clinical outcomes [87]. As mentioned earlier, the integration of social drivers of health into informatics tools and clinical workflows will also improve patient-centered care.

    Coordination

    The third C, coordination, refers to bringing together different parts of the health care system and serving as a bridge between primary care and specialty care. Primary care serves as a contact point to other parts of the health system, including medical specialists and social services.

    Care coordination has been positively correlated with improved care measures such as diabetes, cardiovascular, and cancer screening [105]. Electronic consults (eConsults) thus far have had mixed outcomes [106] but still have the potential to assist with coordination between primary care and specialists and address access to specialty care.

    Care coordination is inextricably linked with communication. Interoperability and facile interfaces for communication can improve interactions between different care team members, and when coupled with timely and convenient access to data, are powerful in advancing patient care. National learning health systems have been posited as a framework to advance interoperability and digital health innovation [107] for the public good.

    Coordination includes administrative tasks around patient care such as documentation of patient encounters. Generative AI solutions, such as ambient AI [108] and medical record summarization [109], have the potential to alleviate the documentation burden in this area and lead to more concise clinician-clinician communication.

    Continuity

    The fourth C, continuity, has highly variable definitions, especially in the context of team-based care, but tends to refer to the patient’s ability to receive care that is centered around relationships and has a sense of longitudinality. Primary care continuity correlates with decreased patient mortality [110]. As mentioned previously, telehealth has provided new touchpoints for primary care practitioners and their patients. Patient portals [43] and patient access to notes [111] have both been shown to increase patients’ understanding of their health, which arguably in turn can be an opportunity for primary care teams to engage patients in their health over time and build trust with patients. Continuity can also be extended to transitions of care between care settings that intersect with primary care, such as inpatient hospitalization, where there is a current dearth of patient-clinician communication tools [112]—this is an area where PCI can provide new bridges for continuity.


    Primary care is the bedrock of health care and PCI in turn can vitalize this bedrock—contributing to societal health and well-being by improving existing workflows or thoughtfully integrating new technologies into care. PCI melds the learnings of primary care and informatics but is also able to add distinctive value to both fields by augmenting the core tenets of primary care with biopsychosocial-driven technologies. At a time when the global primary care workforce is facing immense challenges, PCI professionals have a key role to play in supporting their primary care colleagues, disseminating best practices learned in primary care to other informatics colleagues, and adapting appropriate tools from other branches of biomedical and health informatics into primary care. PCI is evolving as care is delivered across a greater spectrum of settings and patients are empowered with new digital health tools to engage in their health. They can benefit from new opportunities and tools for proactive preventive care rather than reactive chronic disease management. Ultimately, PCI has been an effective area within primary care and will continue to be critical in driving improved patient and clinician experiences for safe, equitable, effective, patient-centered, and team-based care.

    Acknowledgments

    JGTY is supported by the National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health grant (T15LM007092). Ryan Jelinek contributed to the conceptualization and writing of an earlier version of this manuscript.

    Authors' Contributions

    JGTY and MS contributed to writing the original draft. JGTY, MS, TIL, and DP contributed to the conceptualization, writing, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript. JGTY contributed to project administration. MS contributed to supervision.

    Conflicts of Interest

    TIL is the scientific editorial director at JMIR Publications and reports consulting fees from Plushcare, Inc; however, TIL had no involvement in peer review, editorial review, or any aspects of editorial processing of this manuscript. MS reports personal fees from Clearstep Health, Carbon Health, Matter Health, and Nabla Health.

    1. World Health Organization. Primary care. 2024. URL: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/clinical-services-and-systems/primary-care [accessed 2024-02-25]
    2. Robinson SK, Meisnere M, Phillips RLJ, McCauley L. Implementing High-Quality Primary Care: Rebuilding the Foundation of Health Care. Washington, DC. National Academies Press; 2021:45-62.
    3. Primary care. American Academy of Family Physicians. 2024. URL: https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/primary-care.html [accessed 2024-07-13]
    4. 2022 physician specialty data report executive summary. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2022. URL: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/data/2022-physician-specialty-data-report-executive-summary [accessed 2024-07-13]
    5. Brotherton SE, Rockey PH, Etzel SI. US graduate medical education, 2004-2005: trends in primary care specialties. JAMA. 2005;294(9):1075-1082. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Jeffe DB, Whelan AJ, Andriole DA. Primary care specialty choices of United States medical graduates, 1997-2006. Acad Med. 2010;85(6):947-958. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Croke K, Moshabela M, Kapoor NR, Doubova SV, Garcia-Elorrio E, HaileMariam D, et al. Primary health care in practice: usual source of care and health system performance across 14 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(1):e134-e144. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Romaire MA. Use of primary care and specialty providers: findings from the medical expenditure panel survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(7):2003-2009. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Rosano A, Loha CA, Falvo R, van der Zee J, Ricciardi W, Guasticchi G, et al. The relationship between avoidable hospitalization and accessibility to primary care: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(3):356-360. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Sabety AH, Jena AB, Barnett ML. Changes in health care use and outcomes after turnover in primary care. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(2):186-194. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Stange KC, Miller WL, Etz RS. The role of primary care in improving population health. Milbank Q. 2023;101(S1):795-840. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Martin-Misener R, Valaitis R, Wong ST, Macdonald M, Meagher-Stewart D, Kaczorowski J, et al. A scoping literature review of collaboration between primary care and public health. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012;13(4):327-346. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Doty MM, Tikkanen R, Shah A, Schneider EC. Primary care physicians' role in coordinating medical and health-related social needs in eleven countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(1):115-123. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Little DR, Zapp JA, Mullins HC, Zuckerman AE, Teasdale S, Johnson KB. Moving toward a United States strategic plan in primary care informatics: a white paper of the primary care informatics working group, American Medical Informatics Association. Inform Prim Care. 2003;11(2):89-94. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. de Lusignan S. What is primary care informatics? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(4):304-309. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Primary health care informatics WG. International Medical Informatics Association. 2024. URL: https://imia-medinfo.org/wp/primary-health-care-informatics/ [accessed 2024-04-29]
    17. Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, Honour MM, Gupta S, Wang S, et al. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38(3):176-188. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Ludwick DA, Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(1):22-31. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Huang MZ, Gibson CJ, Terry AL. Measuring electronic health record use in primary care: a scoping review. Appl Clin Inform. 2018;9(1):15-33. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Fontaine P, Ross SE, Zink T, Schilling LM. Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(5):655-670. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Odendaal WA, Watkins JA, Leon N, Goudge J, Griffiths F, Tomlinson M, et al. Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3(3):CD011942. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Liyanage H, Liaw ST, Jonnagaddala J, Schreiber R, Kuziemsky C, Terry AL, et al. Artificial intelligence in primary health care: perceptions, issues, and challenges. Yearb Med Inform. 2019;28(1):41-46. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Liaw ST, Kuziemsky C, Schreiber R, Jonnagaddala J, Liyanage H, Chittalia A, et al. Primary care informatics response to COVID-19 pandemic: adaptation, progress, and lessons from four countries with high ICT development. Yearb Med Inform. 2021;30(1):44-55. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Silva CRDV, Lopes RH, de Goes Bay O, Martiniano CS, Fuentealba-Torres M, Arcêncio RA, et al. Digital health opportunities to improve primary health care in the context of COVID-19: scoping review. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022;9(2):e35380. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Kuziemsky C, Liaw ST, Leston M, Pearce C, Jonnagaddala J, de Lusignan S. Towards equitable and resilient digital primary care systems: an international comparison and insight for moving forward. Yearb Med Inform. 2022;31(1):47-59. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Khalil-Khan A, Khan MA. The impact of COVID-19 on primary care: a scoping review. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33241. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. McGrail MR, Wingrove PM, Petterson SM, Bazemore AW. Mobility of US rural primary care physicians during 2000-2014. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(4):322-328. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Ramesh T, Yu H. US pediatric primary care physician workforce in rural areas, 2010 to 2020. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(9):e2333467. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Irving G, Neves AL, Dambha-Miller H, Oishi A, Tagashira H, Verho A, et al. International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017902. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Hanson K, Brikci N, Erlangga D, Alebachew A, de Allegri M, Balabanova D, et al. The Lancet Global Health commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the centre. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(5):e715-e772. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Kato D, Ryu H, Matsumoto T, Abe K, Kaneko M, Ko M, et al. Building primary care in Japan: literature review. J Gen Fam Med. 2019;20(5):170-179. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Mash R, Howe A, Olayemi O, Makwero M, Ray S, Zerihun M, et al. Reflections on family medicine and primary healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 3):e000662. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Gumas ED, Lewis C, Horstman C, Gunja MZ. Finger on the pulse: the state of primary care in the U.S. and nine other countries. The Commonwealth Fund. Mar 28, 2024. URL: https:/​/www.​commonwealthfund.org/​publications/​issue-briefs/​2024/​mar/​finger-on-pulse-primary-care-us-nine-countries [accessed 2024-07-06]
    34. Gunja MZ, Gumas ED, Williams RD, Doty MM, Shah A, Fields K. Stressed out and burned out: the global primary care crisis. The Commonwealth Fund. Nov 17, 2022. URL: https:/​/www.​commonwealthfund.org/​publications/​issue-briefs/​2022/​nov/​stressed-out-burned-out-2022-international-survey-primary-care-physicians [accessed 2024-02-25]
    35. Sinnott C, Dorban-Hall B, Dixon-Woods M. Tackling the crisis in general practice. BMJ. May 02, 2023;381:966. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Friedberg MW, van Busum K, Wexler R, Bowen M, Schneider EC. A demonstration of shared decision making in primary care highlights barriers to adoption and potential remedies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):268-275. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Wildin RS, Giummo CA, Reiter AW, Peterson TC, Leonard DGB. Primary care implementation of genomic population health screening using a large gene sequencing panel. Front Genet. 2022;13:867334. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Borle K, Michaels NJ, Evans DR, Elliott AM, Price M, Austin J. Advancing the quintuple aim for health care improvement through the integration of genetic counselors into primary care. Am J Med. 2023;136(12):1136-1138. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Johnson KB, Wei WQ, Weeraratne D, Frisse ME, Misulis K, Rhee K, et al. Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(1):86-93. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Tang PC, Miller S, Stavropoulos H, Kartoun U, Zambrano J, Ng K. Precision population analytics: population management at the point-of-care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(3):588-595. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Canfell OJ, Littlewood R, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C. Digital health and precision prevention: shifting from disease-centred care to consumer-centred health. Aust Health Rev. 2022;46(3):279-283. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Shaver J. The state of telehealth before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Prim Care. 2022;49(4):517-530. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Carini E, Villani L, Pezzullo AM, Gentili A, Barbara A, Ricciardi W, et al. The impact of digital patient portals on health outcomes, system efficiency, and patient attitudes: updated systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e26189. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Moore J, Dias GY. How to harness the power of health data to improve patient outcomes. World Economic Forum. May 01, 2024. URL: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/01/how-to-harness-health-data-to-improve-patient-outcomes-wef24/ [accessed 2024-07-06]
    45. Rajendran S, Pan W, Sabuncu MR, Chen Y, Zhou J, Wang F. Learning across diverse biomedical data modalities and cohorts: challenges and opportunities for innovation. Patterns. 2024;5(2):100913. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Dinov ID. Volume and value of big healthcare data. J Med Stat Inform. 2016;4:3. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Tallman EF, Richardson D, Rogow TM, Kendrick DC, Dixon BE. Chapter 18—Leveraging HIE to facilitate large-scale data analytics. In: Health Information Exchange. Washington, DC. Academic Press; 2023:399-421.
    48. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1(1):2-4. [Medline]
    49. Bodenheimer T, Ghorob A, Willard-Grace R, Grumbach K. The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):166-171. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Morgenstern JD, Buajitti E, O'Neill M, Piggott T, Goel V, Fridman D, et al. Predicting population health with machine learning: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e037860. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Brnabic A, Hess LM. Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):54. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Clusmann J, Kolbinger FR, Muti HS, Carrero ZI, Eckardt J, Laleh NG, et al. The future landscape of large language models in medicine. Commun Med. 2023;3(1):141. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Meskó B. The impact of multimodal large language models on health care's future. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e52865. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Clark CR, Wilkins CH, Rodriguez JA, Preininger AM, Harris J, DesAutels S, et al. Health care equity in the use of advanced analytics and artificial intelligence technologies in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3188-3193. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Dankwa-Mullan I, Scheufele EL, Matheny ME, Quintana Y, Chapman WW, Jackson G, et al. A proposed framework on integrating health equity and racial justice into the artificial intelligence development lifecycle. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(2):300-317. [CrossRef]
    56. Richardson S, Lawrence K, Schoenthaler AM, Mann D. A framework for digital health equity. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):119. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Liaw ST, Liyanage H, Kuziemsky C, Terry AL, Schreiber R, Jonnagaddala J, et al. Ethical use of electronic health record data and artificial intelligence: recommendations of the primary care informatics working group of the International Medical Informatics Association. Yearb Med Inform. 2020;29(1):51-57. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Who we are and what we do. American College of Physicians. 2024. URL: https://www.acponline.org/about-acp/who-we-are [accessed 2024-07-13]
    59. Daneshvar N, Pandita D, Erickson S, Sulmasy LS, DeCamp M, ACP Medical Informatics Committeethe Ethics‚ ProfessionalismHuman Rights Committee. Artificial intelligence in the provision of health care: an American college of physicians policy position paper. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177(7):964-967. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Levy DR, Sloss EA, Chartash D, Corley ST, Mishuris RG, Rosenbloom ST, et al. Reflections on the documentation burden reduction AMIA plenary session through the lens of 25 × 5. Appl Clin Inform. 2023;14(1):11-15. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Donohue D. A primary care answer to a pandemic: keeping a population of patients safe at home through chronic care management and remote patient monitoring. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020;14(6):595-601. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    62. Farias FACD, Dagostini CM, Bicca YDA, Falavigna VF, Falavigna A. Remote patient monitoring: a systematic review. Telemed e-Health. 2020;26(5):576-583. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    63. Shaik T, Tao X, Higgins N, Li L, Gururajan R, Zhou X, et al. Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: current state, applications, and challenges. WIREs Data Min Knowl Discovery. 2023;13(2):e1485. [CrossRef]
    64. Pannunzio V, Ornelas HCM, Gurung P, van Kooten R, Snelders D, van Os H, et al. Patient and staff experience of remote patient monitoring-what to measure and how: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e48463. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    65. Leung TI, van Merode GG. Value-based health care supported by data science. In: Fundamentals of Clinical Data Science. Cham, Switzerland. Springer International Publishing; 2019:193-212.
    66. Pantell MS, Adler-Milstein J, Wang MD, Prather AA, Adler NE, Gottlieb LM. A call for social informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(11):1798-1801. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    67. Byhoff E, Kangovi S, Berkowitz SA, DeCamp M, Dzeng E, Earnest M, et al. A society of general internal medicine position statement on the internists' role in social determinants of health. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(9):2721-2727. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    68. Capturing Social and Behavioral Domains and Measures in Electronic Health Records: Phase 2. Washington DC. National Academies Press; 2015.
    69. Social determinants of health. World Health Organization. 2024. URL: https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1 [accessed 2024-07-14]
    70. Andermann A, CLEAR Collaboration. Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals. CMAJ. 2016;188(17-18):E474-E483. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    71. Even D, Abdalla SM, Maani N, Galea S. News media as a commercial determinant of health. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(8):e1365-e1369. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    72. Kickbusch I, Allen L, Franz C. The commercial determinants of health. Lancet Global Health. 2016;4(12):e895-e896. [CrossRef]
    73. Montoya-Williams D, Fuentes-Afflick E. Political determinants of population health. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e197063. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    74. Shaw N, McGuire S. Understanding the use of geographical information systems (GIS) in health informatics research: a review. J Innov Health Inform. 2017;24(2):940. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    75. Chiesa V, Chiarenza A, Mosca D, Rechel B. Health records for migrants and refugees: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2019;123(9):888-900. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    76. Brewer LC, Fortuna KL, Jones C, Walker R, Hayes SN, Patten CA, et al. Back to the future: achieving health equity through health informatics and digital health. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(1):e14512. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    77. Rajamani G, Espinosa PR, Rosas LG. Intersection of health informatics tools and community engagement in health-related research to reduce health inequities: scoping review. J Particip Med. 2021;13(3):e30062. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    78. Wagner EH, Flinter M, Hsu C, Cromp D, Austin BT, Etz R, et al. Effective team-based primary care: observations from innovative practices. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):13. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    79. Keleher H, Parker R, Abdulwadud O, Francis K. Systematic review of the effectiveness of primary care nursing. Int J Nurs Pract. 2009;15(1):16-24. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    80. Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, Briot P, Grazier K, Wilcox A, et al. Association of integrated team-based care with health care quality, utilization, and cost. JAMA. 2016;316(8):826-834. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    81. Wang P, Vienneau M, Vogeli C, Schiavoni K, Jubelt L, Mendu ML. Reframing value-based care management: beyond cost reduction and toward patient centeredness. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(6):e231502. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    82. Liu L, Chien AT, Singer SJ. Enabling system functionalities of primary care practices for team dynamics in transformation to team-based care: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(14):2018. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    83. Cliff BQ, Siegel N, Panzer J, Deis E, Patel A, Edmiston C, et al. Effects of advanced team-based care on care processes and health measures in a federally qualified health center. J Ambul Care Manage. 2024;47(1):33-42. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    84. Baratta LR, Harford D, Sinsky CA, Kannampallil T, Lou SS. Characterizing the patterns of electronic health record-integrated secure messaging use: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e48583. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    85. Kwan B, Bell JF, Longhurst CA, Goldhaber NH, Clay B. Implementation of an electronic health record-integrated instant messaging system in an academic health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024;31(4):997-1000. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    86. Sakumoto M, Brosnan M, Gutierrez J. Key considerations for virtual team-based primary care. Society of General Internal Medicine. 2022. URL: https://www.sgim.org/article/key-considerations-for-virtual-team-based-primary-care/ [accessed 2024-07-07]
    87. Willis VC, Craig KJT, Jabbarpour Y, Scheufele EL, Arriaga YE, Ajinkya M, et al. Digital health interventions to enhance prevention in primary care: scoping review. JMIR Med Inform. 2022;10(1):e33518. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    88. Jimenez G, Matchar D, Koh CHG, van der Kleij R, Chavannes NH, Car J. The role of health technologies in multicomponent primary care interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e20195. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    89. Jimenez G, Matchar D, Koh GCH, Tyagi S, van der Kleij RMJJ, Chavannes NH, et al. Revisiting the four core functions (4Cs) of primary care: operational definitions and complexities. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021;22:e68. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    90. Prates ML, Machado JC, Silva LSD, Avelar PS, Prates LL, Mendonça ET, et al. Performance of primary health care according to PCATool instrument: a systematic review. Cien Saude Colet. 2017;22(6):1881-1893. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    91. Weiner JP, Bandeian S, Hatef E, Lans D, Liu A, Lemke KW. In-person and telehealth ambulatory contacts and costs in a large US insured cohort before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e212618. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    92. Thakkar J, Kurup R, Laba TL, Santo K, Thiagalingam A, Rodgers A, et al. Mobile telephone text messaging for medication adherence in chronic disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(3):340-349. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    93. Wei Y, Zheng P, Deng H, Wang X, Li X, Fu H. Design features for improving mobile health intervention user engagement: systematic review and thematic analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12):e21687. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    94. Broderick A, Haque F. Mobile health and patient engagement in the safety net: a survey of community health centers and clinics. The Commonwealth Fund. May 13, 2015. URL: https:/​/www.​commonwealthfund.org/​publications/​issue-briefs/​2015/​may/​mobile-health-and-patient-engagement-safety-net-survey-community [accessed 2024-04-25]
    95. Spiegel BM, Rizzo A, Persky S, Liran O, Wiederhold B, Woods S, et al. What is medical extended reality? A taxonomy defining the current breadth and depth of an evolving field. J Med Ext Real. 2024;1(1):4-12. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    96. Urlings J, Sezer S, Ter Laan M, Bartels R, Maal T, Boogaarts J, et al. The role and effectiveness of augmented reality in patient education: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):1917-1927. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    97. Oniani D, Sreekumar S, DeAlmeida R, DeAlmeida D, Hui V, Lee YJ, et al. Toward improving health literacy in patient education materials with neural machine translation models. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023;2023:418-426. [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    98. Zhu W, Liu H, Dong Q. Multilingual machine translation with large language models: empirical results and analysis. 2024. Presented at: 2024 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; June 16-21, 2024:2765-2781; Mexico City, Mexico. URL: https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-naacl.176.pdf [CrossRef]
    99. Melnick ER, West CP, Nath B, Cipriano PF, Peterson C, Satele DV, et al. The association between perceived electronic health record usability and professional burnout among US nurses. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(8):1632-1641. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    100. Everson J, Hendrix N, Phillips RL, Adler-Milstein J, Bazemore A, Patel V. Primary care physicians' satisfaction with interoperable health information technology. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e243793. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    101. Harada T, Miyagami T, Kunitomo K, Shimizu T. Clinical decision support systems for diagnosis in primary care: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8435. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    102. Porreca D, Yaraghi N. The impact of population health analytics on health care quality and efficacy among CPC+ participants. Milbank Memorial Fund. 2022. URL: https://www.milbank.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/WNY_Report2.pdf [accessed 2024-09-18]
    103. López-Martínez F, Núñez-Valdez ER, García-Díaz V, Bursac Z. A case study for a big data and machine learning platform to improve medical decision support in population health management. Algorithms. 2020;13(4):102. [CrossRef]
    104. Mendu ML, Ahmed S, Maron JK, Rao SK, Chaguturu SK, May MF, et al. Development of an electronic health record-based chronic kidney disease registry to promote population health management. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):72. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    105. Elliott MN, Adams JL, Klein DJ, Haviland AM, Beckett MK, Hays RD, et al. Patient-reported care coordination is associated with better performance on clinical care measures. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(12):3665-3671. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    106. Vimalananda VG, Orlander JD, Afable MK, Fincke BG, Solch AK, Rinne ST, et al. Electronic consultations (E-consults) and their outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(3):471-479. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    107. Sheikh A, Anderson M, Albala S, Casadei B, Franklin BD, Richards M, et al. Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(6):e383-e396. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    108. Tierney AA, Gayre G, Hoberman B, Mattern B, Ballesca M, Kipnis P, et al. Ambient artificial intelligence scribes to alleviate the burden of clinical documentation. NEJM Catalyst. 2024;5(3):CAT.23.0404. [CrossRef]
    109. Bhasker S, Bruce D, Lamb J, Stein G. Tackling healthcare's biggest burdens with generative AI. McKinsey & Company. Jul 10, 2023. URL: https:/​/www.​mckinsey.com/​industries/​healthcare/​our-insights/​tackling-healthcares-biggest-burdens-with-generative-ai [accessed 2024-04-25]
    110. Baker R, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL, Bankart MJ, Nockels KH. Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70(698):e600-e611. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    111. Walker J, Leveille S, Bell S, Chimowitz H, Dong Z, Elmore JG, et al. OpenNotes after 7 years: patient experiences with ongoing access to their clinicians' outpatient visit notes. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e13876. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    112. Spencer RA, Punia HS. A scoping review of communication tools applicable to patients and their primary care providers after discharge from hospital. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(7):1681-1703. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AI: artificial intelligence
    EHR: electronic health record
    PCI: primary care informatics
    SDOH: social determinants of health

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 30.04.24; peer-reviewed by D Little, B Hoyt; comments to author 11.05.24; revised version received 16.07.24; accepted 31.08.24; published 15.10.24.

    Copyright

    ©Jacqueline Guan-Ting You, Tiffany I Leung, Deepti Pandita, Matthew Sakumoto. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 15.10.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (ISSN 1438-8871), is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.