This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (1174) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (485) Reviews in Digital Mental Health (225) Misinformation and Disinformation Outbreaks and Information Prevalence Studies (40) Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management (1010) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1269)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/49255, first published .
Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors of this article:

Chang Lu1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Bo Hu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Qiang Li1 Author Orcid Image ;   Chao Bi1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Xing-Da Ju1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (63) Metrics

Journals

  1. Neylan J, Biddlestone M, Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S. How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020). Scientific Reports 2023;13(1) View
  2. Higham P, Modirrousta-Galian A, Seabrooke T. Mean rating difference scores are poor measures of discernment: The role of response criteria. Current Opinion in Psychology 2024;56:101785 View
  3. Schmid P. Using Behavioral Science for Infodemic Preparedness: The Case of Vaccination Misinformation. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2024;11(1):93 View
  4. Schüz B, Jones C. Falsch- und Desinformation in sozialen Medien: Ansätze zur Minimierung von Risiken in digitaler Kommunikation über Gesundheit. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2024;67(3):300 View
  5. Axelsson C, Nygren T, Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S. Bad News in the civics classroom: How serious gameplay fosters teenagers’ ability to discern misinformation techniques. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2024:1 View
  6. van der Linden S, Roozenbeek J. “Inoculation” to Resist Misinformation. JAMA 2024;331(22):1961 View
  7. Mitsutake S, Oka K, Okan O, Dadaczynski K, Ishizaki T, Nakayama T, Takahashi Y. eHealth literacy and online health information-seeking behaviors on COVID-19 in Japan: An Internet-based mixed methods study (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024 View
  8. van der Linden S, Kyrychenko Y. A broader view of misinformation reveals potential for intervention. Science 2024;384(6699):959 View
  9. Allen J, Watts D, Rand D. Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook. Science 2024;384(6699) View
  10. Douglas K, Sutton R, Biddlestone M, Green R, Toribio-Flórez D. Engaging with Conspiracy Believers. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. van der Linden S. . View
  2. Li X, Liu M, Lian J, Zhu Q. Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. View