This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Research Letter (31) Theme Issue: Mpox Outbreak Rapid Reports (7) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1570) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1274) Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management (1013)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/44697, first published .
Monkeypox Content on TikTok: Cross-sectional Analysis

Monkeypox Content on TikTok: Cross-sectional Analysis

Monkeypox Content on TikTok: Cross-sectional Analysis

Authors of this article:

Antonio Ji-Xu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kyaw Zin Htet2 Author Orcid Image ;   Kieron S Leslie3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Movahedi Nia Z, Bragazzi N, Asgary A, Orbinski J, Wu J, Kong J. Mpox Panic, Infodemic, and Stigmatization of the Two-Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, Intersex, Asexual Community: Geospatial Analysis, Topic Modeling, and Sentiment Analysis of a Large, Multilingual Social Media Database. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e45108 View
  2. Basch C, Yalamanchili B, Fera J, Narayanan S. Most liked #monkeypox videos on TikTok: Implications for infection control. American Journal of Infection Control 2024;52(1):123 View
  3. Leslie A, Okunromade O, Sarker A. Public Perceptions About Monkeypox on Twitter: Thematic Analysis. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e48710 View
  4. Hilbert M, Thakur A, Flores P, Zhang X, Bhan J, Bernhard P, Ji F. 8–10% of algorithmic recommendations are ‘bad’, but… an exploratory risk-utility meta-analysis and its regulatory implications. International Journal of Information Management 2024;75:102743 View