Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/38159, first published .
Establishing Requirements for Technology to Support Clinical Trial Retention: Systematic Scoping Review and Analysis Using Self-determination Theory

Establishing Requirements for Technology to Support Clinical Trial Retention: Systematic Scoping Review and Analysis Using Self-determination Theory

Establishing Requirements for Technology to Support Clinical Trial Retention: Systematic Scoping Review and Analysis Using Self-determination Theory

Authors of this article:

Eoin Gamble1 Author Orcid Image ;   Conor Linehan1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ciara Heavin3 Author Orcid Image

Journals

  1. Raby E, Gittings P, Litton E, Berghuber A, Edgar D, Camilleri J, Owen K, Kendell R, Manning L, Fear M, Wood F. Celecoxib to improve scar quality following acute burn injury: Lessons learned after premature termination of a randomised trial. Burns Open 2024;8(2):128 View
  2. Anastasi J, Capili B, Norton M, McMahon D, Marder K. Recruitment and retention of clinical trial participants: understanding motivations of patients with chronic pain and other populations. Frontiers in Pain Research 2024;4 View
  3. Jean-Louis G, Seixas A. The value of decentralized clinical trials: Inclusion, accessibility, and innovation. Science 2024;385(6711) View
  4. Davis H, Hoberg A, Jacobus L, Nepple K, Seaman A, Sorensen J, Weiner G, Gilbertson-White S. Leveraging oncology collaborative networks and biomedical informatics data resources to rapidly recruit and enroll rural residents into oncology quality of life clinical trials. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2024;8(1) View