This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Theme Issue 2022: Reproductive Informatics (52) Viewpoints and Perspectives (514) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (479)

Published on in Vol 24, No 10 (2022): October

This is a member publication of University of Oxford (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/41417, first published .
The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women’s Health

The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women’s Health

The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women’s Health

Authors of this article:

Sarah Goodday1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Daniel Karlin1, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Christine Suver5 Author Orcid Image ;   Stephen Friend1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Lerma K, Arey W, Chatillon A, White K. Reasons for participation in abortion research in restrictive settings. Contraception 2024;130:110324 View
  2. Schott S, Adams A, Dougherty R, Montgomery T, Lapite F, Fletcher F. Renewed calls for abortion-related research in the post-Roe era. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  3. Shao Y, Meng C, Liang Y. Digital versus non-digital health interventions to improve iron supplementation in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine 2024;11 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Portney K, Sweet A. The Mental Health Clinician’s Handbook for Abortion Care. View