This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Physician and Health Services Rating by Consumers (128)

Published on in Vol 22, No 6 (2020): June

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/14417, first published .
Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study

Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study

Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study

Authors of this article:

Xi Han1 Author Orcid Image ;   Bei Li2 Author Orcid Image ;   Tingting Zhang3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jiabin Qu4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Yan Q, Jensen K, Thomas R, Field A, Jiang Z, Goei C, Davies M. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study. JMIR Cardio 2021;5(1):e22975 View
  2. Han X, Du J, Zhang T, Han W, Zhu Q. How online ratings and trust influence health consumers’ physician selection intentions: An experimental study. Telematics and Informatics 2021;62:101631 View
  3. Niewiadomska E, Łabuz-Roszak B, Pawłowski P, Wypych-Ślusarska A. The Physical and Mental Well-Being of Medical Doctors in the Silesian Voivodeship. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(20):13410 View
  4. Chen T, Wu C, Chiu M, Hsu J, Liao M, Hsueh Y, Su W. Factors Associated with the Patient/Client Use of Report Cards, Physician Rating Websites, Social Media, and Google for Hospital and Physician Selection: A Nationwide Survey. Healthcare 2022;10(10):1931 View
  5. Kühn L, Lindert L, Kuper P, Choi K. SARS-CoV-2–Related Adaptation Mechanisms of Rehabilitation Clinics Affecting Patient-Centered Care: Qualitative Study of Online Patient Reports. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2023;10:e39512 View
  6. Ghosh S, Chakraborty S, Gupta N, Basu S. What ails physician review websites? A study of information needs of patients. Decision Support Systems 2023;166:113897 View
  7. Song S, Xue X, Zhao Y, Li J, Zhu Q, Zhao M. Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(12):e28318 View
  8. Ossai C, Bedrick S, Orwoll B. Using Publicly Available Reddit Data to Understand How Parents Choose Pediatricians. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 2022;26(2):186 View
  9. Guetz B, Bidmon S, Dür M. Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria. PLOS ONE 2022;17(12):e0278510 View
  10. Shah A, Muhammad W, Lee K, Naqvi R. Examining Different Factors in Web-Based Patients’ Decision-Making Process: Systematic Review on Digital Platforms for Clinical Decision Support System. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11226 View
  11. Xu R, Zhang T, Zhang Q. Investigating the effect of online and offline reputation on the provision of online counseling services: A case study of the Internet hospitals in China. Frontiers of Engineering Management 2022;9(4):563 View
  12. Guetz B, Bidmon S. The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review. Health Policy 2023;132:104821 View
  13. Malhotra R, Reddy A, Jotwani R, Schatman M, Mehta N. Dishonest Physician Reviews: Challenging Physician Online Reviews and the Appeals Process. Journal of Medical Systems 2023;48(1) View
  14. Han X, Lin Y, Han W, Liao K, Mei K. Effect of Negative Online Reviews and Physician Responses on Health Consumers’ Choice: Experimental Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e46713 View