This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Viewpoints and Perspectives (514) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (479) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (288)

Published on in Vol 21, No 5 (2019): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/12412, first published .
Health Data Processes: A Framework for Analyzing and Discussing Efficient Use and Reuse of Health Data With a Focus on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Health Data Processes: A Framework for Analyzing and Discussing Efficient Use and Reuse of Health Data With a Focus on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Health Data Processes: A Framework for Analyzing and Discussing Efficient Use and Reuse of Health Data With a Focus on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Authors of this article:

Niels Henrik Ingvar Hjollund1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   José Maria Valderas3 Author Orcid Image ;   Derek Kyte4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Melanie Jane Calvert4, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (14) Metrics

Journals

  1. Hjollund N. Fifteen Years’ Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at the Group and Patient Levels: Trend Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e15856 View
  2. Sánchez Pedraza R, Valderamar A. Validación para utilización en Colombia de la escala EORTC QLQ C-30 para evaluación de la calidad de vida de los pacientes con cáncer. Revista Colombiana de Cancerología 2020;24(2):61 View
  3. Silveira A, Sequeira T, Gonçalves J, Lopes Ferreira P. Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives—a systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2022;20(1) View
  4. Garratt A, Coste J, Rouquette A, Valderas J. The Norwegian PROMIS-29: psychometric validation in the general population for Norway. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2021;5(1) View
  5. Ziegenfuss J, Grossman E, Solberg L, Chrenka E, Werner A, Asche S, Norton C, Nelson A, Reams M, Whitebird R. Is the Promise of PROMs Being Realized? Implementation Experience in a Large Orthopedic Practice. American Journal of Medical Quality 2022;37(6):489 View
  6. Harrison C, Trickett R, Wormald J, Dobbs T, Lis P, Popov V, Beard D, Rodrigues J. Remote Symptom Monitoring With Ecological Momentary Computerized Adaptive Testing: Pilot Cohort Study of a Platform for Frequent, Low-Burden, and Personalized Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e47179 View
  7. Yao Y, Yang F. Overcoming personal information protection challenges involving real-world data to support public health efforts in China. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  8. Noort B, Buijs P, Roemeling O. Outsourcing the Management of Reusable Medical Devices in a Chain-Wide Care Setting: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2023;12:e41409 View
  9. Leontjevaite K, Donnelly A, MacIntyre T. Air Pollution Effects on Mental Health Relationships: Scoping Review on Historically Used Methodologies to Analyze Adult Populations. Air 2024;2(3):258 View
  10. van Engen V, Bonfrer I, Ahaus K, Den Hollander-Ardon M, Peters I, Buljac-Samardzic M. Enhancing Clinicians’ Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Outpatient Care: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e60306 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Cassens M, Lakasz A, Surzykiewicz J. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Public Health in Europe. View
  2. Castro M, Wang M. Chronic Illness Care. View