This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (837) Aging in Place (335)

Published on in Vol 20, No 10 (2018): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10054, first published .
Older People Negotiating Independence and Safety in Everyday Life Using Technology: Qualitative Study

Older People Negotiating Independence and Safety in Everyday Life Using Technology: Qualitative Study

Older People Negotiating Independence and Safety in Everyday Life Using Technology: Qualitative Study

Authors of this article:

Randi Stokke1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Baudin K, Gustafsson C, Frennert S. Views of Swedish Elder Care Personnel on Ongoing Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(6):e15450 View
  2. Trento M, Franceschini M, Fornengo P, Tricarico L, Mazzeo A, Bertello S, Clerico A, Oleandri S, Chiesa M, Di Leva A, Charrier L, Cavallo F, Porta M. Ambient intelligence for long-term diabetes care (AmILCare). Qualitative analysis of patients’ expectations and attitudes toward interactive technology. Endocrine 2021;73(2):472 View
  3. Glomsås H, Knutsen I, Fossum M, Halvorsen K. ‘They just came with the medication dispenser’- a qualitative study of elderly service users’ involvement and welfare technology in public home care services. BMC Health Services Research 2021;21(1) View
  4. Stokke R, Melby L, Isaksen J, Obstfelder A, Andreassen H. A qualitative study of what care workers do to provide patient safety at home through telecare. BMC Health Services Research 2021;21(1) View
  5. Thilo F, Hahn S, Halfens R, Heckemann B, Schols J. Facilitating the use of personal safety alerting device with older adults: The views, experiences and roles of relatives and health care professionals. Geriatric Nursing 2021;42(4):935 View
  6. Nord M. Thinking like a bricoleur: New forms of rigor in research on information experience. Library & Information Science Research 2022;44(4):101197 View
  7. Stokke R, Hellesø R, Sogstad M. Hvorfor er det så vanskelig å integrere velferdsteknologii omsorgstjenesten?. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning 2019;5(3):7 View
  8. Chang F, Östlund B, Kuoppamäki S. Domesticating Social Alarm Systems in Nursing Homes: Qualitative Study of Differences in the Perspectives of Assistant Nurses. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e44692 View
  9. Rolfe S, McCall V, Gibson G, Pusram A, Robertson J. What works in co-producing assistive technology solutions with older people: a scoping review of the evidence. Ageing and Society 2024;44(12):2728 View
  10. Bikova M, Ambugo E, Tjerbo T, Jalovcic D, Førland O. Does assistive technology contribute to safety among home-dwelling older adults?. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View
  11. Bavngaard M, Lund A, Thordardottir B, Rasmussen E. The Uses and Experiences of Synchronous Communication Technology for Home-Dwelling Older Adults in a Home Care Services Context: Qualitative Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e59285 View
  12. Chen K, Wang S, Chao S, Kasirisir K. Link Between Social Relationships and Vulnerability Among Community‐Dwelling Older Adults Living Alone in Taiwan. Asian Social Work and Policy Review 2025;19(1) View
  13. Pekkarinen S, Hennala L, Melkas H. Towards Technology Domestication in a Care Organization? Facilitating and Hindering Factors in Care Robot Use. International Journal of Social Robotics 2025;17(4):655 View
  14. Kruithof K, Ruehle R, Dörenberg V, van Etten-Jamaludin F, Frederiks B. Digital assistive technologies to support community-dwelling older adults: an interpretative synthesis of experienced benefits and harms. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health 2025;8:100584 View