The Influence of Two Different Invitation Letters on Chlamydia Testing Participation: Randomized Controlled Trial

Journals

1. Theunissen K, Hoebe C, Kok G, Crutzen R, Kara-Zaïtri C, De Vries N, Van Bergen J, Hamilton R, Sande M, Dukers-Muijrers N. A Web—Based Respondent Driven Sampling Pilot Targeting Young People at Risk for Chlamydia Trachomatis in Social and Sexual Networks with Testing: A Use Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2015;12(8):9889 View
2. ten Hoor G, Ruiter R, van Bergen J, Hoebe C, Dukers-Muijrers N, Kok G. Predictors of Chlamydia Trachomatis testing: perceived norms, susceptibility, changes in partner status, and underestimation of own risk. BMC Public Health 2015;16(1) View
3. Guy R, Micallef J, Mooney-Somers J, Jamil M, Harvey C, Bateson D, van Gemert C, Wand H, Kaldor J. Evaluation of Chlamydia Partner Notification Practices and Use of the “Let Them Know” Website by Family Planning Clinicians in Australia: a Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(6):e173 View
4. Dixon B, McFarlane T, Dearth S, Grannis S, Gibson P. Characterizing Informatics Roles and Needs of Public Health Workers. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2015;21(Supplement 6):S130 View
5. Armitage S, McColl E, Kolehmainen N, Rapley T. Describing pre‐appointment written materials as an intervention in the context of children’s NHS therapy services: A national survey. Health Expectations 2021;24(2):386 View
6. Kisina V, Anokhina L, Romanova I, Guschin A. Diagnostics of sexually transmitted infections. Actuality and prospects. Klinicheskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya 2023;22(5):542 View