This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

New Methods (944) Hearing Impairment and Hearing Loss (67) Speech and Phonetics in Verbal Protocols (Think Aloud, Recall, and Explanation Tasks) (93)

Published on in Vol 14, No 4 (2012): Jul-Aug

Speech Perception Benefits of Internet Versus Conventional Telephony for Hearing-Impaired Individuals

Speech Perception Benefits of Internet Versus Conventional Telephony for Hearing-Impaired Individuals

Speech Perception Benefits of Internet Versus Conventional Telephony for Hearing-Impaired Individuals

Authors of this article:

Georgios Mantokoudis1 ;   Patrick Dubach1 ;   Flurin Pfiffner1 ;   Martin Kompis1 ;   Marco Caversaccio1 Author Orcid Image ;   Pascal Senn1
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Wolfe J, Morais Duke M, Schafer E, Cire G, Menapace C, O’Neill L. Evaluation of a wireless audio streaming accessory to improve mobile telephone performance of cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology 2016;55(2):75 View
  2. Brännström K, Öberg M, Ingo E, Månsson K, Andersson G, Lunner T, Laplante-Lévesque A. The initial evaluation of an Internet-based support system for audiologists and first-time hearing aid clients. Internet Interventions 2016;4:82 View
  3. Guignard J, Senn P, Koller R, Caversaccio M, Kompis M, Mantokoudis G. Mobile Internet Telephony Improves Speech Intelligibility and Quality for Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otology & Neurotology 2019;40(3):e206 View
  4. Lasak J, Allen P, McVay T, Lewis D. Hearing Loss. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 2014;41(1):19 View
  5. Koerber R, Jennings M. Increasing telephone accessibility for workers with hearing loss: a scoping review with recommendations. International Journal of Audiology 2020;59(10):727 View
  6. Mantokoudis G, Koller R, Guignard J, Caversaccio M, Kompis M, Senn P. Influence of Telecommunication Modality, Internet Transmission Quality, and Accessories on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(4):e135 View
  7. Mantokoudis G, Dähler C, Dubach P, Kompis M, Caversaccio M, Senn P, Kiebel S. Internet Video Telephony Allows Speech Reading by Deaf Individuals and Improves Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users. PLoS ONE 2013;8(1):e54770 View
  8. Wong C, Ching T, Whitfield J, Duncan J. Online Social Participation, Social Capital and Literacy of Adolescents with Hearing Loss: A Pilot Study. Deafness & Education International 2016;18(2):103 View
  9. Borel S, Dupré S, de Bergh M, Sterkers O, Mosnier I, Ferrary E. Rehabilitation of telephone communication in cochlear-implanted adults. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases 2020;137(5):381 View
  10. Giannantonio S, Di Nardo W, Schinaia L, Paludetti G. Adaptation of cochlear implant fitting to various telecommunication systems: a proposal for a ‘telephone map'. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2014;134(8):802 View
  11. Borel S, Dupré S, de Bergh M, Sterkers O, Mosnier I, Ferrary E. Intérêt de la rééducation de la communication téléphonique chez l’adulte implanté cochléaire. Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale 2020;137(5):346 View
  12. Kozma-Spytek L, Vogler C. Factors Affecting the Accessibility of Voice Telephony for People with Hearing Loss: Audio Encoding, Network Impairments, Video and Environmental Noise. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 2021;14(4):1 View
  13. Huth M, Boschung R, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W, Georgios M. The effect of internet telephony and a cochlear implant accessory on mobile phone speech comprehension in cochlear implant users. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2022;279(12):5547 View