This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (679)

Published on in Vol 13, No 3 (2011): Jul-Sep

Cool but Counterproductive: Interactive, Web-Based Risk Communications Can Backfire

Cool but Counterproductive: Interactive, Web-Based Risk Communications Can Backfire

Cool but Counterproductive: Interactive, Web-Based Risk Communications Can Backfire

Authors of this article:

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher1, 2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark Dickson3 ;   Holly O Witteman2, 3
Article Authors Cited by (34) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Shaffer V, Wegier P, Valentine K, Belden J, Canfield S, Patil S, Popescu M, Steege L, Jain A, Koopman R. Patient Judgments About Hypertension Control: The Role of Variability, Trends, and Outliers in Visualized Blood Pressure Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(3):e11366 View
  2. Damman O, Bogaerts N, van den Haak M, Timmermans D. How lay people understand and make sense of personalized disease risk information. Health Expectations 2017;20(5):973 View
  3. Tsubokura M, Onoue Y, Torii H, Suda S, Mori K, Nishikawa Y, Ozaki A, Uno K, Marchiori M. Twitter use in scientific communication revealed by visualization of information spreading by influencers within half a year after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. PLOS ONE 2018;13(9):e0203594 View
  4. Fraenkel L, Peters E, Tyra S, Oelberg D. Shared Medical Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening. Medical Decision Making 2016;36(4):518 View
  5. Spiegelhalter D. Risk and Uncertainty Communication. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 2017;4(1):31 View
  6. Haga S. Educating Patients and Providers Through Comprehensive Pharmacogenetic Test Reports. Pharmacogenomics 2017;18(11):1047 View
  7. Avis J, van Mierlo T, Fournier R, Ball G. Lessons Learned From Using Focus Groups to Refine Digital Interventions. JMIR Research Protocols 2015;4(3):e95 View
  8. Wegier P, Armstrong B, Shaffer V. Aiding Risk Information learning through Simulated Experience (ARISE): A Comparison of the Communication of Screening Test Information in Explicit and Simulated Experience Formats. Medical Decision Making 2019;39(3):196 View
  9. Zikmund-Fisher B, Witteman H, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Exe N, Kahn V, Dickson M. Animated Graphics for Comparing Two Risks: A Cautionary Tale. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(4):e106 View
  10. Avis J, Holt N, Maximova K, van Mierlo T, Fournier R, Padwal R, Cave A, Martz P, Ball G. The Development and Refinement of an e-Health Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Parents to Prevent Childhood Obesity in Primary Care. Telemedicine and e-Health 2016;22(5):385 View
  11. Trevena L, Zikmund-Fisher B, Edwards A, Gaissmaier W, Galesic M, Han P, King J, Lawson M, Linder S, Lipkus I, Ozanne E, Peters E, Timmermans D, Woloshin S. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013;13(S2) View
  12. Mavletova A, Gavrilov K, Tholmogorova T. Gamifying a web survey among adolescents: effects on understanding of risk, risk calculation, and ratio-bias. Journal of Risk Research 2019;22(12):1532 View
  13. Jobin M, Visschers V, van Vliet O, Árvai J, Siegrist M. Affect or information? Examining drivers of public preferences of future energy portfolios in Switzerland. Energy Research & Social Science 2019;52:20 View
  14. Bonner C, Jansen J, Newell B, Irwig L, Glasziou P, Doust J, Dhillon H, McCaffery K. I Don't Believe It, But I'd Better Do Something About It: Patient Experiences of Online Heart Age Risk Calculators. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(5):e120 View
  15. Stellamanns J, Ruetters D, Dahal K, Schillmoeller Z, Huebner J. Visualizing risks in cancer communication: A systematic review of computer-supported visual aids. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(8):1421 View
  16. Ruiz J, Andrade A, Garcia-Retamero R, Anam R, Rodriguez R, Sharit J. Communicating global cardiovascular risk: Are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?. Patient Education and Counseling 2013;93(3):394 View
  17. Xexakis G, Trutnevyte E. Are interactive web-tools for environmental scenario visualization worth the effort? An experimental study on the Swiss electricity supply scenarios 2035. Environmental Modelling & Software 2019;119:124 View
  18. McIntyre R, Craig A. A Literature Review of Patient Education: Is IT Time to Move Forward?. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences 2015;46(3):S75 View
  19. Fagerlin A, Valley T, Scherer A, Knaus M, Das E, Zikmund-Fisher B. Communicating infectious disease prevalence through graphics: Results from an international survey. Vaccine 2017;35(32):4041 View
  20. Camerini L, Schulz P. Effects of Functional Interactivity on Patients’ Knowledge, Empowerment, and Health Outcomes: An Experimental Model-Driven Evaluation of a Web-Based Intervention. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(4):e105 View
  21. Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely E. Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017;59(4):582 View
  22. Trevena L, Bonner C, Okan Y, Peters E, Gaissmaier W, Han P, Ozanne E, Timmermans D, Zikmund-Fisher B. Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts. Medical Decision Making 2021;41(7):834 View
  23. Gómez-Ramírez O, Thomson K, Salway T, Haag D, Falasinnu T, Grennan T, Grace D, Gilbert M. “Mini Dial-A-Nurses” and “Good Brands“: What Are the Desirable Features of Online HIV/STI Risk Calculators?. AIDS Education and Prevention 2020;32(6):528 View
  24. Clarke M, Fruhling A, Lyden E, Tarrell A, Bernard T, Windle J. Computer Skills Role in Personal Health Record Adoption Among Patients With Heart Disease: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation of Users versus Non-Users (Preprint). JMIR Human Factors 2020 View
  25. Housten A, Kozower B, Engelhardt K, Robinson C, Puri V, Samson P, Cooksey K, Politi M. Developing an Educational and Decision Support Tool for Stage I Lung Cancer Using Decision Science. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2023;115(2):299 View
  26. Strikwerda J, Holleman B, Hoeken H. Designing pension communication. Information Design Journal 2021;26(3):260 View
  27. Valentine K, Wegier P, Shaffer V, Scherer L. The Impact of 4 Risk Communication Interventions on Cancer Screening Preferences and Knowledge. Medical Decision Making 2022;42(3):387 View
  28. Beaudart C, Hiligsmann M, Li N, Lewiecki E, Silverman S. Effective communication regarding risk of fracture for individuals at risk of fragility fracture: a scoping review. Osteoporosis International 2022;33(1):13 View
  29. Ripberger J, Bell A, Fox A, Forney A, Livingston W, Gaddie C, Silva C, Jenkins-Smith H. Communicating Probability Information in Weather Forecasts: Findings and Recommendations from a Living Systematic Review of the Research Literature. Weather, Climate, and Society 2022;14(2):481 View
  30. Cotter L, Yang S. Are interactive and tailored data visualizations effective in promoting flu vaccination among the elderly? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2024;31(2):317 View
  31. Ancker J, Benda N, Zikmund-Fisher B. Insufficient evidence for interactive or animated graphics for communicating probability. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2024;31(11):2760 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. . Risk Communication. View
  2. . Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks. View
  3. Wang L, Zheng M. Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology. View