This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (531) Physician and Health Services Rating by Consumers (128)

Published on in Vol 1, No 1 (1999):

Can Examination of WWW Usage Statistics and other Indirect Quality Indicators Help to Distinguish the Relative Quality of Medical websites?

Can Examination of WWW Usage Statistics and other Indirect Quality Indicators Help to Distinguish the Relative Quality of Medical websites?

Can Examination of WWW Usage Statistics and other Indirect Quality Indicators Help to Distinguish the Relative Quality of Medical websites?

Authors of this article:

Angel A Hernández-Borges ;   Pablo Macías-Cervi ;   María Asunción Gaspar-Guardado ;   María Luisa Torres-Álvarez DeArcaya ;   Ana Ruiz-Rabaza ;   Alejandro Jiménez-Sosa
Article Authors Cited by (17) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Williams P, Nicholas D, Huntington P, McLean F. Surfing for health: user evaluation of a health information website. Part one: background and literature review. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2002;19(2):98 View
  2. Thelwall M. A research and institutional size‐based model for national university Web site interlinking. Journal of Documentation 2002;58(6):683 View
  3. Leung R. Increasing the Impact of JMIR Journals in the Attention Economy. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(10):e16172 View
  4. Masterton G, Olsson E, Angere S. Linking as voting: how the Condorcet jury theorem in political science is relevant to webometrics. Scientometrics 2016;106(3):945 View
  5. Thelwall M. Evidence for the existence of geographic trends in university Web site interlinking. Journal of Documentation 2002;58(5):563 View
  6. Theodosiou L, Green J. Emerging challenges in using health information from the internet. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2003;9(5):387 View
  7. Nicholas D, Huntington P, Williams P, Gunter B. Perceptions of the authority of health information. Case study: digital interactive television and the Internet. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2003;20(4):215 View
  8. Williams P, Nicholas D, Huntington P, Gunter B. Doc.com: reviewing the literature on remote health information provision. Aslib Proceedings 2002;54(2):127 View
  9. Eysenbach G, Jadad A. Evidence-based Patient Choice and Consumer health informatics in the Internet age. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(2):e19 View
  10. Thelwall M, Harries G. Can Personal Web Pages that Link to Universities Yield Information about the Wider Dissemination of Research?. Journal of Information Science 2004;30(3):240 View
  11. Al‐Bahrani A, Plusa S. The quality of patient‐orientated internet information on colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease 2004;6(5):323 View
  12. Till J. Peer Review in a Post-Eprints World: A Proposal. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2000;2(3):e14 View
  13. Bohacek L, Gomez M, Fish J. An Evaluation of Internet Sites for Burn Scar Management. The Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation 2003;24(4):246 View
  14. Thelwall M. Interpreting social science link analysis research: A theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006;57(1):60 View
  15. Thelwall M. Extracting macroscopic information from Web links. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2001;52(13):1157 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. D'Alessandro D. Pediatric Informatics. View