This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Mobile Health (mhealth) (2920) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1659) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (708) eHealth Infrastructures (342) Quality Improvement (251) mHealth for Health Administration (143) E-Health / Health Services Research and New Models of Care (511) mHealth in a Clinical Setting (613) Physician and Health Services Rating by Consumers (128) Health Services Research (476) Health Services in Resource-Poor Settings and LMICs (411) Tools and Questionnaires in Human Factors Evaluation (50) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (830)

Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/55140, first published .
Service Quality and Patient Satisfaction of Internet Hospitals in China: Cross-Sectional Evaluation With the Service Quality Questionnaire

Service Quality and Patient Satisfaction of Internet Hospitals in China: Cross-Sectional Evaluation With the Service Quality Questionnaire

Service Quality and Patient Satisfaction of Internet Hospitals in China: Cross-Sectional Evaluation With the Service Quality Questionnaire

Authors of this article:

Tao Han1 Author Orcid Image ;   Qinpeng Wei1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ruike Wang1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yijin Cai1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hongyi Zhu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jiani Chen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Zhiruo Zhang1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sisi Li1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

    Original Paper

    School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Sisi Li, PhD

    School of Public Health

    Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    227 Chongqing South Road

    Shanghai, 200025

    China

    Phone: 86 02163846590 ext 776145

    Email: lisi8318@gmail.com


    Background: Internet hospitals, which refer to service platforms that integrate consultation, prescription, payment, and drug delivery based on hospital entities, have been developing at a rapid pace in China since 2014. However, assessments regarding their service quality and patient satisfaction have not been well developed. There is an urgent need to comprehensively evaluate and improve the service quality of internet hospitals.

    Objective: This study aims to investigate the current status of patients’ use of internet hospitals, as well as familiarity and willingness to use internet hospitals, to evaluate patients’ expected and perceived service qualities of internet hospitals using the Chinese version of the Service Quality Questionnaire (SERVQUAL-C) with a national representative sample, and to explore the association between service quality of internet hospitals and patients’ overall satisfaction toward associated medical platforms.

    Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted through face-to-face or digital interviews from June to September 2022. A total of 1481 outpatient participants (635 men and 846 women; mean age 33.22, SD 13.22). Participants reported their use of internet hospitals, and then rated their expectations and perceptions of service quality toward internet hospitals via the SERVQUAL-C, along with their demographic information.

    Results: Among the surveyed participants, 51.2% (n=758) of participants had used internet hospital service or services. Use varied across age, education level, and annual income. Although the majority of them (n=826, 55.8%) did not know internet hospital services well, 68.1% (n=1009) of participants expressed the willingness to adopt this service. Service quality evaluation revealed that the perceived service quality did not match with the expectation, especially the responsiveness dimension. Important-performance analysis results further alerted that reliable diagnosis, prompt response, clear feedback pathway, and active feedback handling were typically the services awaiting substantial improvement. More importantly, multiple linear regressions revealed that familiarity and willingness to use internet hospital services were significant predictors of satisfaction, above and over tangibles, reliability, and empathy service perspectives, and demographic characteristics such as gender, age, education level, and annual income.

    Conclusions: In the future, internet hospitals should focus more on how to narrow the gaps between the expected and perceived service quality. Promotion of internet hospitals should also be facilitated to increase patients’ familiarity with and willingness to use these services.

    J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55140

    doi:10.2196/55140

    Keywords

    service quality; SERVQUAL; Service Quality Questionnaire; internet hospital; e-hospital; digital medical care; health care professionals; Chinese digital health care 


    Internet Hospital Services in China

    Internet hospital (or e-hospital) services have been developing at a rapid pace in China since 2014, which refer to hospital-based service platforms that integrate consultation, prescription, payment, and drug delivery, mostly featured in digital follow-up and routine consultations [1,2]. To date, China has witnessed the establishment of over 1700 internet hospitals with an extensive array of services [3]. The rapid growth of internet hospitals in China is expected to enhance the availability and accessibility of medical resources nationwide while controlling the costs associated with distant medical services [4]. Additionally, the strike of the COVID-19 pandemic has further expedited the advancement and acceptance of remote medical care, with internet hospitals playing a pivotal role [5,6]. However, despite the rapid development of internet hospitals, assessments regarding their service quality and patient satisfaction have not been well developed [7]. This study attempted to fill in this research gap.

    Internet hospital services heavily rely on various digital platforms such as smartphone apps or miniprograms integrated into popular social media platforms (eg, WeChat or Alipay). The service quality provided by internet hospital platforms directly impacts the medical experience of patients as it encompasses (1) appointment, registration, guided triage, and referral during the previsit stage; (2) remote payment, and instant access to case and test reports during the visit stage; and (3) prescription management, drug delivery, health monitoring, and remote health education during the postvisit stage. Granted these benefits, it was undeniable that the rapid development and engagement of internet hospitals had raised several practical issues such as limited service accessibility to older people and risks of personal information leakage. Therefore, it was critical to comprehensively assess, and therefore, improve the service quality of internet hospitals [8].

    The Service Quality Questionnaire

    The service quality model was initially developed by Parasuraman et al [9] to investigate potential causes of service quality issues and assist managers in improving service quality. The model was further refined and a measurement tool was developed accordingly, namely, the Service Quality Questionnaire (SERVQUAL) [10,11], which measures customers’ expectations and perceptions of the service quality provided by an entity, reflecting their attitudes toward the service provider [10], highlighting the gaps between what customers believe should be provided (expectations) and what they believe they have received (perceptions). The SERVQUAL questionnaire consists of 5 dimensions (22 items) [10]: tangibles, which refers to the physical facilities, equipment, and appearance of personnel; reliability, which assesses the ability to deliver services accurately and dependably; responsiveness, which examines the willingness to assist customers and provide prompt service; assurance, which evaluates employees’ knowledge, courtesy, and ability to convey trust and confidence; and empathy, which assesses the level of care and individualized attention provided to customers. The SERVQUAL questionnaire has been applied to evaluate service quality in health-related contexts [12-14], demonstrating its suitability for assessing medical service quality. Therefore, it was adopted to evaluate the service quality of Chinese internet hospitals and to identify the possible gaps between expected and perceived service qualities.

    This Study

    To briefly summarize, the purpose of this study was threefold, (1) to investigate the current status of Chinese patients’ use of internet hospitals, as well as their familiarity and willingness to use internet hospitals; (2) to evaluate Chinese patients’ expected and perceived service qualities of internet hospitals using SERVQUAL with a nationally representative sample; and (3) to explore the association between service quality of internet hospitals and overall satisfaction of associated medical platforms.


    Participants

    A total of 1586 participants were recruited via convenient sampling from 31 provinces in China. Inclusion criteria were (1) had used medical services in China within 1 year and (2) consented to participate in this study.

    Procedure

    A cross-sectional e-survey was administered on the SoJump platform (a popular Chinese digital survey platform) from June to September 2022. Recruitment for the survey was carried out through WeChat, a widely used social media platform in China. Potential participants were invited to complete the survey via WeChat moments. Investigators received digital data collection training sessions in advance for survey distribution, data collection monitoring, and quality control. Research team members conducted quality control on submitted responses based on (1) duplicate IP addresses, (2) shorter-than-expected response time window, and (3) incomplete responses. A total of 105 responses that failed at these criteria were excluded from the following analyses. Therefore, the final sample consisted of 1481 participants. Additionally, the 758 people who self-reported having used internet hospital services were further included in the analysis.

    Ethical Considerations

    This study was approved by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Public Health and Nursing Research Ethics Committee (reference: SJUPN-202203). All eligible participants who consented to participate were informed about the study’s purpose and procedure and then were asked to respond to the e-survey without interference. Data collection was conducted anonymously to ensure confidentiality. For participants deemed minor according to their reported age, further consent was requested from their legal guardians. Participants did not receive any material or monetary rewards for participation.

    Materials

    Participants responded to a battery of surveys including SERVQUAL-C, satisfaction with internet hospital services, and their demographic information.

    Internet Hospital Use and Experience

    Patients first reported whether they had used the internet hospital (0=no or 1=yes), together with the frequency of use: “How often do you use the internet hospital” (1=never used before to 5=more than five times per year). Reasons for and against using internet hospitals were followed via multiple-choice questions (ie, “What are your reasons for using internet hospitals?” and “What are your reasons against using internet hospitals?”). Then, participants reported their overall familiarity, willingness to use, and satisfaction with internet hospitals by answering the questions “How much do you know about internet hospitals?” (1=barely to 5=very well), “How willing are you to use internet hospitals?” (1=very unwilling to 5=very willing), and “All things considered, how satisfied were you toward Chinese internet hospitals in general?” (1=not at all satisfied to 10=extremely satisfied).

    Service Quality of Internet Hospitals

    The 22-item SERVQUAL questionnaire consists of five dimensions of service quality (4 to 5 items each; 1=very poor to 5=very good), namely tangibles (TG; eg, “The aesthetic degree of internet hospital platform page design”), reliability (RA; eg, “Reliability of treatment results in internet hospitals”), responsiveness (RS; eg, “The timeliness of the internet hospital doctor’s response”), assurance (AS; eg, “The extent to which the internet hospital platform meets the needs of patients”), and empathy (EP; eg, “The extent to which internet hospitals provide personalized care for patients”), each question measures both the perception and the expectation perspectives, respectively. Therefore, SERVQUAL yields three scores, specifically, the perception (P) and the expectation (E) scores, which are computed by averaging the 22 items from each perspective, respectively, and the gap score, which is further computed by subtracting the latter from the former (ie, P–E).

    Sociodemographic Information

    At the end of the questionnaire, participants reported their sociodemographic information, including gender (0=man and 1=woman), age (1=19 years or younger, 2=20-29 years, 3=30-39 years, 4=40-49 years, and 5=50 years or older), location (1=eastern region, 2=central region, 3=western region, and 4=northeast region), marital status (1=unmarried and 2=married), education level (1=below high school’s degree, 2=high school’s degree, 3=bachelor’s degree, and 4=higher than bachelor’s degree), as well as personal annual income (1=¥50,000 or below, 2=¥50,001-100,000, 3=¥100,001-150,000, 4=¥150,001-200,000, and 5=¥200,001 or above). The exchange rate of US $ to RMB ¥ mentioned in this paper is 1:7.0354.

    Statistical Analysis

    All personal identifiers have been removed prior to data analysis to ensure anonymization. All data were analyzed with SPSS (version 25.0; IBM Corp) and R (version 4.2.0; R Core Team). The questionnaire was calculated to reflect internet hospital patients’ evaluations. Additionally, important-performance analysis (IPA) [15] was used to compare patients’ expectations and perceptions of the services provided by internet hospitals and to reveal critical management perspectives. Finally, multiple linear regressions were also conducted to examine the association between service quality, demographics, familiarity, and willingness in patient satisfaction. All continuous variables have been centralized.


    Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of all the participants (n=1481; 635 men and 846 women). Participants were mainly women (n=846, 57.1%), aged between 20 and 29 (n=429, 29%), and married (n=820, 55.4%). The majority of the sample received a bachelor’s degree education (n=969, 65.4%) and received less than 50,000 Chinese Yuan per year.

    It was found that 51.2% (n=758) of patients had used internet hospitals. Results suggested that there were significant differences in whether patients had used the internet hospital at different levels of age (P<.001), education level (P=.006), and annual income (P<.001), while differences in gender or marital status were not statistically significant.

    Specifically, patients in their 20s (n=268, 62.5%) and 30s (n=190, 72%) had a higher percentage of using internet hospitals. Moreover, the use of internet hospitals varied among patients with different levels of education and annual income. A total of 59.6% (n=65) of patients with higher than bachelor’s degrees had tried internet hospitals, compared with 40% (n=145) of those with lower than high school degrees. Only 39.9% (n=265) of the patients with an annual income of below ¥50,000 had participated in internet hospitals.

    A total of 51.2% (n=758) of the patients had used internet hospitals, among which 42.9% (n=325) of the patients used internet hospitals 1-3 times per year. It was also found that there was diversity in the patients’ familiarity and willingness among those who have ever used internet hospital service before. Patients who knew internet hospitals well or excellently only accounted for 26.9% (n=398) and 17.4% (n=258), respectively. A total of 20.3% (n=301) of the patients had poor (n=230, 15.5%) or terrible (n=71, 4.8%) familiarity with internet hospitals. In terms of willingness, 68.1% (n=1009) of the patients gave positive answers, showing a willingness to use internet hospitals. A total of 29% (n=429) of the patients had neutral willingness, and only 2.9% (n=43) of the patients were unwilling to participate in internet hospitals.

    Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and use of internet hospital service among Chinese patients from June to September 2022 (n=1481).

    		Use of internet hospital serviceP value

    		Overall, n (%)Yes, n (%)No, n (%)
    Gender.56

    		Man635 (42.9)331 (43.7)304 (42)

    		Woman846 (57.1)427 (56.3)419 (58)
    Age (in years)<.001

    		≤19274 (18.5)97 (12.8)177 (24.5)

    		20-29429 (29)268 (35.4)161 (22.3)

    		30-39264 (17.8)190 (25.1)74 (10.2)

    		40-49332 (22.4)130 (17.2)202 (27.9)

    		≥50182 (12.3)73 (9.6)109 (15.1)
    Location<.001

    		Eastern Region906 (61)476 (62.8)427 (59.1)

    		Central Region272 (18.4)128 (16.9)144 (19.9)

    		Western Region264 (17.8)118 (15.6)146 (20.2)

    		Northeast Region42 (2.8)36 (4.7)6 (0.8)
    Marital status.31

    		Unmarried661 (44.6)328 (43.3)333 (46.1)

    		Married820 (55.4)430 (56.7)390 (53.9)
    Education level.006

    		<High school degree145 (9.8)58 (7.7)87 (12)

    		High school degree258 (17.4)143 (18.9)115 (15.9)

    		Bachelor’s degree969 (65.4)492 (64.9)477 (66)

    		>Bachelor’s degree109 (7.4)65 (8.6)44 (6.1)
    Annual income (US $1=RMB 7.0354)<.001

    		≤ ¥50,000664 (44.8)265 (35)399 (55.2)

    		¥50,001-100,000353 (23.8)207 (27.3)146 (20.2)

    		¥100,001-150,000258 (17.4)158 (20.8)100 (13.8)

    		¥150,001-200,000118 (8)69 (9.1)49 (6.8)

    		≥ ¥200,00188 (5.9)59 (7.8)29 (4)

    Table 2 presents patients’ reasons for (n=758) and against (n=723) using internet hospitals. Major reasons for and against using internet hospitals were time-saving (n=500, 66%) and inaccuracy in diagnosis or treatment (n=427, 59.1%), respectively. Meanwhile, cost-saving (n=45, 5.9%) and hard-to-find suitable platforms (n=235, 32.5%) were the least concerned.

    Table 3 shows the expectation, perception, and gap scores of the SERVQUAL questionnaire. In the evaluation of Chinese internet hospital service, reliability (mean E 4.12, SD 0.67) received the highest score while empathy (mean E 4.06, SD 0.40) received the lowest score for the expectation perspective, and when it comes to perception perspective, assurance (mean P 3.87, SD 0.74) received the highest score while empathy (mean P 3.79, SD 0.80) still received the lowest score. Across all dimensions, the perception did not meet the expectation of service quality of internet hospitals (namely, all gap scores were negative), and it was noteworthy that the largest gap was observed in the responsiveness dimension.

    IPA results are presented in Figure 1. Specifically, the x-axis represents the perception while the y-axis represents the expectation scores, therefore, items in Quadrant I were service features where the performance matched the importance (eg, Q7, protected privacy), while Quadrant II were their counterparts where service qualities should be boosted (eg, Q13, active feedback handling). More importantly, most of the responsiveness features fell into Quadrant II, indicating the perceived responsiveness of internet hospitals in the eyes of patients is less than expected and awaits substantial improvement. Quadrant III consisted of items with low expectations and low perceptions (eg, Q19, personalized care), predominantly the empathy items, where lower expectations led to these items being given a lower priority. Quadrant IV consisted of items with perceptions exceeding expectations, (eg, Q22, reasonable charge), reflecting the strengths and attractiveness of internet hospital service.

    Table 4 presents the results of three multiple linear regression models predicting patients’ overall satisfaction with Chinese internet hospitals. Model 1 included five dimensions of internet hospitals’ service quality. In Model 2, two variables regarding familiarity and willingness to use internet hospitals were further added. Finally, Model 3 further included gender, age, location, marital status, education level, and annual income using the “enter” method to examine the associations between service quality perspectives, familiarity, and willingness to use internet hospitals above and beyond these control variables.

    Model 1 (adjusted R2=0.526; F5,752=168.8; P<.001) revealed that among the included SERVQUAL-C dimensions, only tangibles (P<.001), reliability (P=.06), and empathy (P<.001) were significant and positively associated with patients’ overall satisfaction while others were not (Bs<.250; Ps>.066). Among the significant predictors, empathy contributed the most to the explained variance in patient satisfaction.

    Model 2 (ΔR2=0.033; ΔF7,750=29.7; P<.001) revealed that familiarity and willingness were significantly and positively associated with patients’ satisfaction, above and beyond the SERVQUAL dimensions, and the inclusion of which further resulted in nonsignificance of the reliability dimension (B=.260; P=.08). Willingness appeared a stronger predictor than familiarity in predicting patient’s satisfaction while controlling the SERVQUAL-C dimensions.

    Table 2. Reasons for and against using internet hospitals among Chinese patients from June to September 2022a.

    		Count, n (%)
    Reasonsforusinginternet hospitals (n=758)

    		No queuing could save time500 (66)

    		No need to commute364 (48)

    		Unable or inconvenient to seek offline medical treatment306 (40.4)

    		Simplified medical processes in internet hospitals, easy to operate319 (42.1)

    		Only mild conditions so no need to go for offline consultation159 (21)

    		Access to quality medical resources in more developed areas126 (16.6)

    		Internet hospitals are cost-saving45 (5.9)
    Reasons against using internet hospitals (n=723)

    		Inaccuracy in diagnosis or treatment, hard to trust427 (59.1)

    		Delay in medical treatment due to untimely digital response385 (53.3)

    		Internet hospital operation is complicated and inconvenient290 (40.1)

    		Worried about the leakage of private, medical information275 (38)

    		Hard to find suitable internet hospital platforms235 (32.5)

    aResponses are presented in descending order in frequency.

    Table 3. Expectations, perceptions, and gaps in service quality of internet hospitals according to SERVQUALa among Chinese patients from June to September 2022 (n=758).
    ItemMean (SD)Gaps

    		EbPc
    TGd

    		Q1: smooth operation4.14 (0.76)3.84 (0.87)–0.30

    		Q2: rich functions4.05 (0.82)3.82 (0.87)–0.23

    		Q3: clear layout4.10 (0.78)3.84 (0.89)–0.26

    		Q4: aesthetical layout4.01 (0.81)3.85 (0.86)–0.16

    		Dimension mean4.08 (0.68)3.84 (0.76)–0.24
    RAe

    		Q5: comprehensive departments4.10 (0.80)3.83 (0.88)–0.27

    		Q6: professional health care4.11 (0.78)3.89 (0.85)–0.22

    		Q7: protected privacy4.15 (0.81)3.85 (0.88)–0.30

    		Q8: reliable diagnosis4.12 (0.78)3.81 (0.87)–0.31

    		Q9: dependable service4.11 (0.75)3.83 (0.90)–0.28

    		Dimension mean4.12 (0.67)3.84 (0.73)–0.28
    RSf

    		Q10: accurate guidance4.10 (0.77)3.84 (0.84)–0.26

    		Q11: Prompt response4.10 (0.80)3.78 (0.97)–0.32

    		Q12: Clear feedback pathway4.10 (0.79)3.78 (0.94)–0.32

    		Q13: Active feedback handling4.11 (0.80)3.78 (0.95)–0.33

    		Dimension mean4.10 (0.69)3.80 (0.81)–0.30
    ASg

    		Q14: trustworthiness of the platform4.09 (0.77)3.82 (0.88)–0.27

    		Q15: Satisfaction of the demand4.06 (0.78)3.79 (0.89)–0.27

    		Q16: Attitude of the doctor4.12 (0.77)3.96 (0.82)–0.16

    		Q17: Rationality of the process4.13 (0.77)3.88 (0.85)–0.25

    		Q18: Standardization of the operation4.12 (0.77)3.90 (0.86)–0.22

    		Dimension mean4.10 (0.67)3.87 (0.74)–0.23
    EPh

    		Q19: personalized care4.06 (0.82)3.77 (0.94)–0.29

    		Q20: understood need4.07 (0.80)3.76 (0.89)–0.31

    		Q21: offered medical advice4.07 (0.78)3.80 (0.92)–0.27

    		Q22: reasonable charge4.05 (0.80)3.84 (0.90)–0.21

    		Dimension mean4.06 (0.70)3.79 (0.80)–0.27
    Overall4.09 (0.63)3.83 (0.71)–0.26

    aSERVQUAL: Service Quality Questionnaire.

    bE: Expected service quality estimated by SERVQUAL-C.

    cP: Perceived service quality estimated by SERVQUAL-C.

    dTG: Tangibles.

    eRA: Reliability.

    fRS: Responsiveness.

    gAS: Assurance.

    hEP: Empathy.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Importance-performance analysis of internet hospital service quality among Chinese patients from June to September 2022 (n=758). Grid lines represent mean scores of expectation and perception, respectively. Solid dots represent tangibles (namely, Q1 to Q4), triangles represent reliability (namely, Q5 to Q9), diamonds represent responsiveness (namely, Q10 to Q13), squares represent assurance (namely, Q14 to Q18), and circles represent empathy (namely, Q19 to Q22).
    Table 4. Predictors of patient satisfaction with internet hospital services: service quality, familiarity, willingness, and demographics among Chinese patients from June to September 2022 (n=758).

    		BSEP value95% CIη2
    Model 1a

    		Tangibles.4450.124<.0010.201 to 0.6890.016

    		Reliability.3730.153.020.073 to 0.6730.008

    		Responsiveness.2500.136.07–0.016 to 0.5160.004

    		Assurance.2340.160.15–0.081 to 0.5480.003

    		Empathy.6890.137<.0010.420 to 0.9580.032
    Model 2b

    		Tangibles.3590.120.0030.123 to 0.5950.012

    		Reliability.2600.148.08–0.031 to 0.5510.004

    		Responsiveness.2100.132.11–0.048 to 0.4680.003

    		Assurance.2170.155.16–0.087 to 0.5200.003

    		Empathy.6360.132<.0010.376 to 0.8960.030

    		Familiarity.1670.057.0040.055 to 0.2800.011

    		Willingness.3970.074<.0010.252 to 0.5410.037
    Model 3c

    		Tangibles.3470.119.0050.104 to 0.5700.011

    		Reliability.2800.147.06–0.008 to 0.5690.005

    		Responsiveness.2170.130.09–0.038 to 0.4720.004

    		Assurance.2510.153.10–0.049 to 0.5510.004

    		Empathy.5750.130<.0010.319 to 0.8310.026

    		Familiarity.1310.059.030.015 to 0.2470.007

    		Willingness.3840.073<.0010.241 to 0.5270.037

    		Gender–.2330.094.01–0.417 to –0.049]0.008

    		Age (years; reference:≤19)0.036


    		20-29.7240.161<.0010.407 to 1.040



    		30-39.8790.183<.0010.520 to 1.238



    		40-49.5200.194.0070.140 to 0.901



    		≥ 50.6310.215.0030.210 to 1.053


    		Location (reference:Northeast Region)0.005


    		Eastern Region–.2040.217.35–0.630 to 0.222



    		Central Region–.3790.237.11–0.843 to 0.086



    		Western Region–.3410.242.16–0.816 to 0.134


    		Marital status–.1190.094.20–0.303 to 0.0650.002

    		Education level (reference:<high school)0.012


    		High school’s degree–.1890.195.33–0.572 to 0.193



    		Bachelor’s degree–.4420.179.01–0.794 to –0.090



    		> Bachelor’s degree–.4320.235.07–0.893 to 0.029


    		Annual income (reference:≤ ¥50,000)0.010


    		¥50,001-100,000–.3190.131.02–0.575 to 0.063



    		¥100,001-150,000–.1080.146.46–0.395 to 0.179



    		¥150,001-200,000.0100.186.96–0.354 to0.375



    		≥ ¥200,001–.1930.196.33–0.579 to 0.193

    aModel 1: F5,752=168.8; P<.001, R2=0.526.

    bModel 2: ΔF7,750=29.7; P<.001; ΔR2=0.033.

    cModel 3: ΔF23,734=6.48; P<.001; ΔR2=0.055.

    Model 3 (R2=0.055; ΔF23,734=6.48; P<.001) revealed that gender, age, education level, and annual income were all significant predictors of patients’ overall satisfaction with Chinese internet hospital service while marital status was not. Specifically, patients with a bachelor’s degree were significantly less satisfied with internet hospitals compared to those with a high school (or below) degree (ie, the reference group; B=–.442; P=.01; 95% CI –0.794 to –0.090); and patients with an annual income between ¥50,001 and ¥100,000 were significantly less satisfied with internet hospitals compared to those with an annual income below ¥50,000 (US $ 7019.91; ie, the reference group; B=–.319; P=.02; 95% CI –0.575 to –0.063). Most importantly, after controlling for the patient’s demographic characteristics, the effects of the service perspectives (tangibles and empathy), as well as familiarity and willingness remained significant. Overall, the 5 SERVQUAL-C dimensional scores contributed significantly to the explanation of variances in patients’ satisfaction, while the inclusion of familiarity and willingness, as well as the sociodemographic variables, only slightly improved the explanation.


    Principal Findings

    This study evaluated the service quality of internet hospitals in China via the Chinese version of SERVQUAL from the perspective of patients, and associated patients’ satisfaction. To summarize, the current service quality of Chinese internet hospitals as perceived by patients did not yet meet their expectations, especially in terms of service responsiveness. Factors associated with patient satisfaction suggested that patient familiarity with and willingness to use internet hospitals cast on their overall satisfaction.

    In our research, we found that more than half of the sampled participants had used internet hospitals. However, there is a big gap in the penetration rate of internet hospitals between the young and the older people older than 60 years, which may be related to the older people are not used to the internet, and the psychological resistance caused by the fear of fraud. Our results also demonstrated that education level and annual income played an important role in determining whether patients had used internet hospitals. This finding emphasized the necessity of lowering the threshold and fee of using internet hospitals, which can be achieved by creating more user-friendly web pages, providing more smooth operation, or introducing more favorable policies [16], etc.

    Furthermore, there was diversity in the patients’ familiarity and willingness to use internet hospitals. The majority of participants found it hard to evaluate their familiarity with internet hospitals, yet many more expressed interest and willingness to use this service. This could be attributable to the lack of publicity and promotion of internet hospital services so patients were not yet aware of the possible convenience and applicability of Chinese internet hospitals. At the same time, the patients’ stronger willingness also pointed out that internet hospitals’ functions could serve as an important supplement to the current health care system and associated health care service to further improve both the health care service and patients’ experience. It was noteworthy that the COVID-19 pandemic had somehow fastened the development of the internet hospital service scope and quality, especially in China [17]. Therefore, it is expected that patients’ willingness toward internet hospitals might further enhance to the extent that they become more and more familiar with its services.

    Our results also indicated that patients’ expectations as regards the quality of the provided services are not met. All of the five quality dimensions have a negative gap between patients’ expectations and perceptions. These results are similar to other studies using the SERVQUAL model in China [18] and other countries such as Greece [19-21]. The greatest gap lies in responsiveness (–0.308) and reliability (–0.276). However, the difference between the two dimensions of expectations and perceptions does not necessarily indicate a low quality of service, but rather that the patient’s requirements are not met, thus leading to patient dissatisfaction. IPA results showed that prompt response, clear feedback pathway, and active feedback handling demonstrate high expectations but low perception levels, which covered three of the four items of responsiveness. Gaps revealed in IPA corroborated patients’ reported reasons for and against using internet hospitals. Specifically, timely responses, as well as diagnosis and treatment accuracy, were the most concerning reasons. Improvement in these perspectives would significantly enhance patients’ willingness toward internet hospitals. Another item that warranted research attention was reliable diagnosis, it was undeniable that the convenience of digital interaction inevitably introduced higher risks of misdiagnosis. Therefore, developers should pay more attention to the importance of user-friendly interfaces and feedback from internet hospital users to promote efficient and effective responses. Furthermore, more policies and regulations ought to be adopted to regulate information security and digital health care processes to minimize the perceived information risk and medical risks.

    Results revealed that patient-perceived tangibility, reliability, and empathy positively predicted satisfaction, with increased empathy being particularly effective in improving satisfaction. This may be due to the fact that patients originally have low expectations of empathy, and once a high-quality empathic service is perceived, the sense of surprise that comes with it can substantially increase satisfaction. At the same time, responsiveness, which had a low patient perception score, was unexpectedly not a significant predictor of satisfaction, which may be the result of a large gap between perceived and expected aspects of responsiveness, and the fact that if responsiveness is not currently sufficient for normal service delivery, patients will also see improved responsiveness as a basic requirement that should have been achieved and will not be able to establish a link with satisfaction.

    In addition, patients’ familiarity and willingness to use the internet hospital were similarly significantly and positively associated with satisfaction, and the association of these dimensions on satisfaction was not affected by the introduction of demographic variables. Therefore, strengthening the publicity and promotion of internet hospitals among the patient population so that more people can learn to use internet hospitals more conveniently and quickly, as well as increasing the willingness of patients to use internet hospitals when they have a need for medical care, can better improve satisfaction and establish a more amicable and stable digital consultation platform.

    Conclusions

    Using the SERVQUAL questionnaire, this study shed light on gaps between the expected and the perceived service quality of Chinese internet hospitals from patients’ perspectives. In the future, internet hospitals should focus more on how to improve reliable diagnosis, prompt response, and active and clear feedback pathways. In this way, internet hospitals could improve patients’ satisfaction and provide superior telemedicine services, and consequently, patient’s willingness to use internet hospitals in need.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank all the participants and staff of this study. No generative artificial intelligence was used in the writing of this manuscript.

    Data Availability

    The datasets analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

    Authors' Contributions

    TH designed the study, conducted all statistical analyses, and wrote the manuscript. QW organized project implementation and wrote the manuscript. TH and QW contributed equally and share the first authorship. RW assisted with the results section. YC assisted with the discussion section. HZ provided data for tables. JC provided data for the figure. ZZ designed and supervised the study. SL provided methodology and data verification and supervised the completion of manuscript revisions. ZZ (zhangzhiruo@sjtu.edu.cn) and SL contributed equally and share correspondence. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Xie X, Zhou W, Lin L, Fan S, Lin F, Wang L, et al. Internet hospitals in China: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(7):e239. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Ge F, Qian H, Lei J, Ni Y, Li Q, Wang S, et al. Experiences and challenges of emerging online health services combating COVID-19 in China: retrospective, cross-sectional study of internet hospitals. JMIR Med Inform. 2022;10(6):e37042. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Zhi L, Yin P, Ren J, Wei G, Zhou J, Wu J, et al. Running an internet hospital in China: perspective based on a case study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e18307. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Lai Y, Chen S, Li M, Ung COL, Hu H. Policy interventions, development trends, and service innovations of internet hospitals in China: documentary analysis and qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e22330. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Chen J, Jie L, Su X, Zhang X, Guo D, Wang J, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and the operation of a tertiary hospital in Tianjin—the impact of internet healthcare on hospital business indicators. Front Public Health. 2022;10:892773. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Ding L, She Q, Chen F, Chen Z, Jiang M, Huang H, et al. The internet hospital plus drug delivery platform for health management during the COVID-19 pandemic: observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e19678. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Qiu Y, Liu Y, Ren W, Qiu Y, Ren J. Internet-based and mobile-based general practice: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(9):e266. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Roncero C, Remon-Gallo D, Casado-Espada N, Aguilar L, Gamonal-Limcaoco S, Gallego MT, et al. Healthcare professionals' perception and satisfaction with mental health tele-medicine during the COVID-19 outbreak: a real-world experience in telepsychiatry. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:981346. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Parasuraman AP, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark. 1985;49(4):41-50. [CrossRef]
    10. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail. 1988;64(1):12-40. [FREE Full text]
    11. Parasuraman A, Berry LL, Zeithaml VA. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J Retail. 1991;67(4):420-450. [FREE Full text]
    12. Teshnizi SH, Aghamolaei T, Kahnouji K, Teshnizi SMH, Ghani J. Assessing quality of health services with the SERVQUAL model in Iran. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018;30(2):82-89. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Jonkisz A, Karniej P, Krasowska D. The servqual method as an assessment tool of the quality of medical services in selected Asian countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7831. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Nadi A, Shojaee J, Abedi G, Siamian H, Abedini E, Rostami A. Patients' expectations and perceptions of service quality in the selected hospitals. Med Arch. 2016;70(2):135-139. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Martilla JA, James JC. Importance-performance analysis. J Mark. 1977;41(1):77-79. [CrossRef]
    16. Li P, Luo Y, Yu X, Wen J, Mason E, Li W, et al. Patients' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to the adoption of E-hospitals: cross-sectional study in Western China. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e17221. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Xu X, Cai Y, Wu S, Guo J, Yang L, Lan J, et al. Assessment of internet hospitals in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: national cross-sectional data analysis study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e21825. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Fan LH, Gao L, Liu X, Zhao SH, Mu HT, Li Z, et al. Patients' perceptions of service quality in China: an investigation using the SERVQUAL model. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0190123. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Goula A, Stamouli MA, Alexandridou M, Vorreakou L, Galanakis A, Theodorou G, et al. Public hospital quality assessment. Evidence from Greek health setting using SERVQUAL model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3418. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Gadeka D, Esena R. Quality of care of medical imaging services at a teaching hospital in Ghana: clients' perspective. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020;51(1):154-164. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Zun AB, Ibrahim MI, Hamid AA. Level of satisfaction on service quality dimensions based on SERVQUAL model among patients attending 1 Malaysia clinic in Kota Bharu, Malaysia. Oman Med J. 2018;33(5):416-422. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    IPA: important-performance analysis
    SERVQUAL: Service Quality Questionnaire

    Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 05.12.23; peer-reviewed by M Mota Morales, X Ma, L-J Jang; comments to author 23.05.24; revised version received 12.06.24; accepted 26.09.24; published 08.11.24.

    Copyright

    ©Tao Han, Qinpeng Wei, Ruike Wang, Yijin Cai, Hongyi Zhu, Jiani Chen, Zhiruo Zhang, Sisi Li. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.11.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (ISSN 1438-8871), is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.