Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/52509, first published .
System-Wide Change Is Essential to Value the Contributions of Women in Medicine and Science

System-Wide Change Is Essential to Value the Contributions of Women in Medicine and Science

System-Wide Change Is Essential to Value the Contributions of Women in Medicine and Science

Editorial

1Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

2Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States

3Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States

*all authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Shikha Jain, MD

Department of Medicine

University of Illinois at Chicago

1740 W Taylor St

Chicago, IL, 60612

United States

Phone: 1 773 960 2567

Email: sjain03@gmail.com


The persistent and pervasive gender gap in health care is a fact backed by data, science, and evidence. This editorial aims to describe some of the challenges that continue to persist. Many of the strategies outlined can be implemented both locally and nationally to effect meaningful change and work toward closing the existing gender gap in health care.

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e52509

doi:10.2196/52509

Keywords


Inequities in our health care systems are pervasive and systemic and have a direct impact on the health care workforce, as well as on patient care delivery and outcomes. Regrettably, due to a lack of female representation in leadership positions, the same women are frequently called upon to address these systemic challenges within our health care systems. To genuinely achieve systemic transformations, we must adopt a comprehensive approach that not only tackles the underlying issues but also avoids burdening the same individuals repeatedly. Our goal in curating and publishing articles from women in medicine and science in this special edition was to collect solution-driven perspectives on the gender gap that continues to permeate our health care systems [1]. We must do more to find intentional solutions for real change.

The persistent invisible work and structural inequities lead to increased rates of burnout for women in medicine [2,3]. During the pandemic, women’s vital yet unseen organizational contributions became apparent. Much of this invisible work focused not only on navigating the challenges that came with a new airborne virus but also on worker well-being, retention, and overall organizational health. Despite being crucial, this work is undervalued, often done by the same few women, eventually leading to burnout [4]. Women experience higher burnout rates than men in part due to structural inequities, and in many cases, this leads to unexpected career shifts or even attrition from the workforce [5]. These types of systemic issues are not unique to the United States; they have been identified in many other countries as well [6]. Additionally, the burden for those with intersectional identities such as women of color is even higher.

For effective and sustained change, we need system-wide structural changes. This essential work must be done by those with a platform and with the ability to make the necessary changes. It must be funded and cannot be relegated to “free time” or “after hours special projects,” lest we continue to perpetuate the uncompensated “third shift” and burn out those women most driven to advocate for change [7]. Individuals in leadership roles must drive structural improvements and allocate resources, avoiding relegation to off-hour projects that perpetuate uncompensated efforts. Additionally, when looking at the big picture, data consistently shows that when there is diversity in leadership, retention and recruitment are better, and when women physicians are taking care of patients, outcomes are better [8,9].

In an effort to counter the biases women in medicine and science face, we created this special edition to highlight solution-driven perspectives.

  1. Leaders must address and strategically work to change the lack of female representation in leadership positions within health care. This will require deliberate efforts to promote gender diversity and inclusivity with intentional paths for sponsorship and coaching specifically tailored to support women’s career advancement [10].
  2. A transformative shift is needed to recognize and compensate for the invisible work primarily carried out by women in health care. Assigning value and offering protected time for these tasks, including citizenship and leadership roles, is essential. Current relative value unit productivity and academic promotion models inadequately assess the value and time invested in these roles, demanding a reimagining by institutional leadership of reimbursement and promotion strategies in line with the evolving health care workforce.
  3. One consistent finding is that women are interested in elevating and sponsoring other women. However, there are a small number of women at the top working hard to lift others as they rise, using a push-pull mentoring strategy [11]. The impact and effectiveness of these strategies have been shown to be successful in different case studies and anecdotally, and can be useful strategies to engage trainees and junior faculty in learning strategies early on that can be used throughout their careers. Senior faculty should invite midcareer faculty to publish with them and then mentor and sponsor them to ensure their success [12].
  4. It is essential to dismantle the traditional hierarchical structure in health care that hinders progress toward equity in health care [13]. This would involve re-evaluating existing institutional policies and practices that perpetuate gender bias and adopting more inclusive and flexible models of leadership and decision-making. Allowing junior faculty and trainees to take on leadership roles and sponsoring them for those roles, based on their experience and expertise, can lend itself to effective bidirectional mentorship. By embracing collaborative approaches and empowering individuals at all levels, regardless of gender, we can create a culture of shared responsibility and accountability for driving meaningful change.
  5. Another key aspect of achieving systemic change is investing time and money into comprehensive training and education programs promoting inclusive leadership, cultural competence, and diversity awareness [14]. One example is supporting women through women in medicine groups that can provide community building through networking events and professional development through skill-building workshops [15]. Leaders in health care should prioritize investing in these opportunities for their faculty.
  6. It is imperative that there are diverse voices and perspectives at the table when working toward shaping health care policies and practices. The work cannot simply be relegated to the individuals who are members of these marginalized groups because this inevitably results in the burnout of those few individuals working toward change. Champions, allies, and accomplices of all genders and races are essential if we are really interested in driving change and moving forward, and they should be invited to participate in discussions addressing the need for change.
  7. Creating and fostering networks for growth are key components to the path toward more diverse leadership at the top. Ensuring our networks are as diverse as the communities we serve will allow for more options and chances to approach individuals for opportunities that may otherwise not be considered. Being innovative in creating and fostering these networks is also a key to growing and nurturing these types of networks that often provide the largest opportunities for growth.
  8. Social media can be an innovative way to amplify others’ work and an effective way to engage with leaders in the field across specialties. Social media has been found to be effective at helping women advance their careers, allowing for network development and collaborations across institutions and engagement at medical conferences, whether in attendance or via social media [16]. These are innovative approaches to growing networks, amplifying the research and achievements of others, and sponsoring women in medicine that have been found to impact the advancement of women in medicine [17].
  9. Those with intersectional identities face double and sometimes triple the burdens and challenges. Organizations must recognize the minority tax and assign real value to diversity, equity, and inclusion work. If we want to see a significant change in our leadership makeup, we must not only sponsor women of color to lead but also set them up for success with support, mentorship, and coaching, and avoid the proverbial “glass cliff.” By actually investing in these efforts, we can increase the probability of advancing exceptional women of color into leadership roles, and strategically, these change agents can innovate and disrupt health care systems for the better [18].
  10. Many of these challenges contribute to fueling the burnout epidemic we continue to face within our systems. Addressing burnout in a holistic manner, focusing on prevention by providing resources for coaching, mentorship, or work-life concierge services and by reviewing vacation and family leave and modifying to align with the modern workforce, would go a long way in improving retention of women in the health care workforce [19,20].

Addressing the pervasive inequities in our health care systems requires a multifaceted approach, and these initiatives and strategies must be championed by those in leadership regardless of gender or race. By promoting diversity in health care leadership, valuing and compensating the invisible work performed most often by women, challenging traditional hierarchical structures, investing in training and education, and actively and strategically engaging and sponsoring diverse voices, we have an opportunity to work toward real systemic change. This special edition on women in medicine and science explores unique perspectives and experiences. It also provides actionable strategies to promote a more equitable workplace. We encourage readers to share this collection with key members of their practices and organizations, and shift the responsibilities for change from the few who consistently step up to the rest of the health care community.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. Jain S, Allan J, Bhayani RK. Theme Issue 2023: Women in Medicine and Science. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023. URL: https://www.jmir.org/themes/1301-theme-issue-2023-women-in-medicine-and-science [accessed 2023-09-11]
  2. Devlin RK. Women in medicine: burned out and fed up. Medscape. URL: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/971510 [accessed 2023-09-11]
  3. Cawcutt KA, Clance P, Jain S. Bias, burnout, and imposter phenomenon: the negative impact of under-recognized intersectionality. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2021;2(1):643-647. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Cooper M. Research: women leaders took on even more invisible work during the pandemic. Harvard Business Review. Oct 13, 2021. URL: https://hbr.org/2021/10/research-women-took-on-even-more-invisible-work-during-the-pandemic [accessed 2023-09-11]
  5. Allen J, Oxentenko A. Four lessons learned from career pivots in academic medicine. J Med Internet Res. Jun 13, 2023;25:e47641. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Ruza I. Exploring the road of women to medical leadership: a European perspective. J Med Internet Res. Jul 05, 2023;25:e49247. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Santhosh L, Keenan BP, Jain S. The "Third Shift": a path forward to recognizing and funding gender equity efforts. J Womens Health (Larchmt). Nov 2020;29(11):1359-1360. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Wallis CJD, Jerath A, Coburn N, Klaassen Z, Luckenbaugh AN, Magee DE, et al. Association of surgeon-patient sex concordance with postoperative outcomes. JAMA Surg. Feb 01, 2022;157(2):146-156. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med. Feb 01, 2017;177(2):206-213. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Silver JK. Six practical strategies to mentor and sponsor women in academic medicine. J Med Internet Res. May 25, 2023;25:e47799. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Silver JK, Gavini N. The push-pull mentoring model: ensuring the success of mentors and mentees. J Med Internet Res. May 25, 2023;25:e48037. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Allan JM, Brooks AK, Crusto C, Feld LD, Oxentenko AS, Spector ND, et al. Five strategies leaders in academic medicine can implement now to enhance gender equity. J Med Internet Res. Jun 13, 2023;25:e47933. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Kays MN, Rupert DD, Negris O, Thompson B, Clayman ML, Mordell L, et al. Flattening hierarchical structures to empower women trainee leaders on social media teams. J Med Internet Res. Jun 05, 2023;25:e47800. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Himstedt JDS, Bloomgarden E, Shah P. Empowering the invisible: accelerating leadership development for midcareer women in medicine. J Med Internet Res. Jun 16, 2023;25:e47801. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Zhong L, Lee K, Baggstrom MQ, Bhayani RK. Investing in women trainees: building a women in medicine group at an academic institution. J Med Internet Res. May 31, 2023;25:e47783. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Pendergrast T. Description of the Novel Networking, Open Discussion, Engagement, and Self-Promotion (NODES) framework for the advancement of women physicians on social media. J Med Internet Res. Jun 08, 2023;25:e48965. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Shillcutt SK, Silver JK. Social media and advancement of women physicians. N Engl J Med. Jun 14, 2018;378(24):2342-2345. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Dorsey C, Arora VM, Carter K. Fixing Flexner: disrupting and rebuilding academic medicine for women of color to lead. J Med Internet Res. May 10, 2023;25:e47773. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Meese KA, Boitet LM, Sweeney KL, Nassetta L, Mugavero M, Hidalgo B, et al. Still exhausted: the role of residual caregiving fatigue on women in medicine and science across the pipeline. J Med Internet Res. Jun 14, 2023;25:e47629. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Majmudar S, Graff SL, Kays M, Braz BX, Matt-Amaral L, Markham MJ, et al. The careers and professional well-being of women oncologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: responding for tomorrow. J Med Internet Res. Aug 21, 2023;25:e47784. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

Edited by T Leung; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 06.09.23; accepted 11.09.23; published 22.09.23.

Copyright

©Shikha Jain, Jessica M Allan, Rakhee K Bhayani. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 22.09.2023.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.