Published on in Vol 23, No 10 (2021): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/32425, first published .
Intervening on Trust in Science to Reduce Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation and Increase COVID-19 Preventive Behavioral Intentions: Randomized Controlled Trial

Intervening on Trust in Science to Reduce Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation and Increase COVID-19 Preventive Behavioral Intentions: Randomized Controlled Trial

Intervening on Trust in Science to Reduce Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation and Increase COVID-19 Preventive Behavioral Intentions: Randomized Controlled Trial

Journals

  1. Iles I, Gillman A, O'Connor L, Ferrer R, Klein W. Understanding responses to different types of conflicting information about cancer prevention. Social Science & Medicine 2022;311:115292 View
  2. Czechowska-Derkacz B, Łosiewicz M. Sposoby komunikacji uczelni w czasie pandemii COVID-19. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze 2022;65(2 (250)):63 View
  3. Agley J, Xiao Y, Eldridge L, Meyerson B, Golzarri-Arroyo L. Beliefs and misperceptions about naloxone and overdose among U.S. laypersons: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2022;22(1) View
  4. Agley J, Xiao Y, Thompson E, Golzarri-Arroyo L. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e45482 View
  5. Hanson B, Finley K, Otto J, Ward N. Role of Trusted Sources and Behavioral Beliefs in Promoting Mitigation Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(3):e37454 View
  6. Volkov B, Hoyo V, Hunt J. Engaging community in the translational process: Environmental scan of adaptive capacity and preparedness of Clinical and Translational Science Award Program hubs. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2023;7(1) View
  7. Agley J, Xiao Y, Thompson E, Golzarri-Arroyo L. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility. JMIR Research Protocols 2022;11(9):e41747 View
  8. Liu C, Wu C. Effects of working memory and relevant knowledge on reading texts and infographics. Reading and Writing 2023;36(9):2319 View
  9. Bustamante Cabrera G, Mansilla Canelas G, Álvarez Becerra R, Morillas Bulnes A, Cachicatari Vargas E. Percepcion social de difusión no responsable de información y descalificacion científica en Covid-19. Telos Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales 2022;24(3):537 View
  10. Barlett C, Taipina S, Russo T. The importance of attitudes on mask wearing behavior: The moderating role of trust in science. Personality and Individual Differences 2023;214:112342 View
  11. Baxter M, Lonsdale M. Improving the design of public health infographics using a motion graphic educational resource to enhance design principle application. Information Design Journal 2023;28(2):141 View
  12. Thompson E. Early COVID-19 Home-Based Care Knowledge and Efficacies: Comparing Ghanaian and US Respondents. Journal of Health Communication 2023;28(6):335 View
  13. Arif A, Turaga R. Covid-19 cure perceptions and media use in India. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 2023;16(4):358 View
  14. Tippins E, Ysseldyk R, Peneycad C, Anisman H. Believing in science: Linking religious beliefs and identity with vaccination intentions and trust in science during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science 2023;32(8):1003 View
  15. Lu C, Hu B, Li Q, Bi C, Ju X. Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e49255 View
  16. Hu B, Ju X, Liu H, Wu H, Bi C, Lu C. Game-based inoculation versus graphic-based inoculation to combat misinformation: a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2023;8(1) View
  17. Agley J, Xiao Y. Low trust in science may foster belief in misinformation by aligning scientifically supported and unsupported statements. Perspectives in Public Health 2023;143(4):199 View
  18. Rosman T, Grösser S. Belief updating when confronted with scientific evidence: Examining the role of trust in science. Public Understanding of Science 2024;33(3):308 View
  19. Plohl N, Musil B. Trust in science moderates the effects of high/low threat communication on psychological reactance to COVID-19-related public health messages. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 2023;16(4):401 View
  20. Abascal Miguel L, Maiorana A, Saggese G, Campbell C, Bourdeau B, Arnold E. A Co-Created Tool to Help Counter Health Misinformation for Spanish-Speaking Communities in the San Francisco Bay Area. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2024;21(3):294 View
  21. Moore R, Callaghan-Koru J, Vincenzo J, Patton S, Spear M, Riklon S, Alik E, Padilla Ramos A, Takamaru S, McElfish P, Curran G. External relationships as implementation determinants in community-engaged, equity-focused COVID-19 vaccination events. Frontiers in Health Services 2024;4 View
  22. Bray L, Jervis L, Janitz A, Ross L, Tallbull G, VanWagoner T, Diviani N. Toward trustworthy COVID-19 interventions: Building vaccine trust through community-university partnerships. PLOS ONE 2024;19(3):e0300872 View
  23. Heley K, Chou W, D’Angelo H, Senft Everson N, Muro A, Rohde J, Gaysynsky A. Mitigating Health and Science Misinformation: A Scoping Review of Literature from 2017 to 2022. Health Communication 2024:1 View
  24. Wolff S, Breakwell G, Wright D. Psychometric evaluation of the Trust in Science and Scientists Scale. Royal Society Open Science 2024;11(4) View
  25. Ishizumi A, Kolis J, Abad N, Prybylski D, Brookmeyer K, Voegeli C, Wardle C, Chiou H. Beyond misinformation: developing a public health prevention framework for managing information ecosystems. The Lancet Public Health 2024;9(6):e397 View
  26. Kisa S, Kisa A. A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e56931 View
  27. Butdisuwan S, M. Annamma L, Subaveerapandiyan A, George B, Kataria S, Wu X. Visualising Medical Research: Exploring the Influence of Infographics on Professional Dissemination. The Scientific World Journal 2024;2024(1) View
  28. Agley J, Mumaw C, Johnson B. Rationale and Study Checklist for Ethical Rejection of Participants on Crowdsourcing Research Platforms. Ethics & Human Research 2024;46(4):38 View
  29. Hartwig K, Doell F, Reuter C. The Landscape of User-centered Misinformation Interventions - A Systematic Literature Review. ACM Computing Surveys 2024;56(11):1 View
  30. Kokkinias K, Pruneski K, Wrighton K, Kelp N, Diviani N. Examination of public perceptions of microbes and microbiomes in the United States reveals insights for science communication. PLOS ONE 2024;19(10):e0312427 View
  31. Miri A, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Afshari M, Bashirian S, Tapak L. Understanding the features and effectiveness of randomized controlled trials in reducing COVID-19 misinformation: a systematic review. Health Education Research 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Bitzer E, Schaefer C. Gesundheitskompetenz. View