Published on in Vol 23, No 10 (2021): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/32365, first published .
Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design

Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design

Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design

Journals

  1. Houwen T, Vugts M, Lansink K, Theeuwes H, Neequaye N, Beerekamp M, Joosen M, de Jongh M. Developing mHealth to the Context and Valuation of Injured Patients and Professionals in Hospital Trauma Care: Qualitative and Quantitative Formative Evaluations. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(2):e35342 View
  2. Benson J, Wolfson D, van den Broek-Altenburg E. Tradeoffs in Triage of Motor Vehicle Trauma by Rural 911 Emergency Medical Services Practitioners. Medical Decision Making 2023;43(3):311 View
  3. Nguyen H, Vo T, Tran H, Nguyen B, Nguyen H, Nguyen T, Anuratpanich L. The heterogeneity of public preferences for the first healthcare visit: A discrete choice experiment in the context of Vietnam. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 2023;38(2):473 View
  4. Tan S, Wang Y, Tang Y, Jiang R, Chen M, Chen H, Yang F. Societal preferences for funding orphan drugs in China: An application of the discrete choice experiment method. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10 View
  5. Genie M, Ryan M, Krucien N. Keeping an eye on cost: What can eye tracking tell us about attention to cost information in discrete choice experiments?. Health Economics 2023;32(5):1101 View
  6. El-Toukhy S, Pike J, Zuckerman G, Hegeman P. Decision Trade-Offs in Ecological Momentary Assessments and Digital Wearables Uptake: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e47567 View
  7. Fischer A, Mühlbacher A. Patient and Public Acceptance of Digital Technologies in Health Care: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e46056 View
  8. Xiao L, Min H, Wu Y, Zhang J, Ning Y, Long L, Jia K, Jing W, Sun X. Public’s preferences for health science popularization short videos in China: a discrete choice experiment. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  9. Phillips J, Durand-Morat A, Nalley L, Graterol E, Bonatti M, Loaiza de la Pava K, Urioste S, Yang W. Understanding demand for broken rice and its potential food security implications in Colombia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 2024;15:100884 View
  10. Son Y, Lee Y, Jo J. Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Forest Ecosystem Services Based on Forest Ownership Classification in South Korea. Forests 2024;15(3):551 View
  11. Arije O, Madan J, Hlungwani T. Preferences in adolescents and young people’s sexual and reproductive health services in Nigeria: a discrete choice experiment. Health Economics Review 2024;14(1) View
  12. Mohammed Selim S, Senanayake S, McPhail S, Carter H, Naicker S, Kularatna S. Consumer Preferences for a Healthcare Appointment Reminder in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2024;17(5):537 View
  13. Le Stum M, Clave A, Adzinyo Agbemanyole K, Stindel E, Le Goff-Pronost M. A pilot study on preferences from surgeons to deal with an innovative customized and connected knee prosthesis – A discret choice experiment. Heliyon 2024;10(10):e30041 View
  14. Frith M, Boyd J, Savira F, Senyel D, Norman R, Jones J, Robinson S. Investigating consumer preferences and experiences of telehealth services in Australian allied health practice: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2024;14(5):e082577 View
  15. Prima Citta S, Uehara T, Cordier M, Tsuge T, Asari M. Promoting menstrual cups as a sustainable alternative: a comparative study using a labeled discrete choice experiment. Frontiers in Sustainability 2024;5 View
  16. Gisbert J, Schreiber S, Siegel C, Magro F, Jus A, Whichello C, Michaels-Igbokwe C, Heidenreich S, Oortwijn A, Vermeire S. Benefit-Risk Trade-offs and Patient Preferences for Therapy Selection in Ulcerative Colitis: a Multicountry Preference Study. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 2025;31(5):1281 View
  17. Belay Y, Yitayal M, Atnafu A, Taye F. Patients’ Preferences for Antiretroviral Therapy Service in Northwest Ethiopia: A Discrete Choice Experiment. MDM Policy & Practice 2024;9(2) View
  18. Dzobo M, Dzinamarira T, Strauss M, Mashamba-Thompson T. Rural women's preferences for cervical cancer screening via HPV self-sampling: a discrete choice experiment study in chidamoyo, Hurungwe District, Zimbabwe. AJOG Global Reports 2024;4(4):100414 View
  19. Soe N, Latt P, King A, Lee D, Phillips T, Fairley C, Zhang L, Ong J. What Do People Want from an AI-Assisted Screening App for Sexually Transmitted Infection-Related Anogenital Lesions: A Discrete Choice Experiment. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2025;18(2):131 View
  20. Latt P, Soe N, King A, Lee D, Phillips T, Xu X, Chow E, Fairley C, Zhang L, Ong J. Preferences for attributes of an artificial intelligence-based risk assessment tool for HIV and sexually transmitted infections: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Public Health 2024;24(1) View
  21. Szinay D, Cameron R, Jones A, Whitty J, Chadborn T, Brown J, Naughton F. Eliciting Preferences for the Uptake of Smoking Cessation Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2025;27:e37083 View
  22. Kong Q, de Vries H, Poyraz D, Kayyal A. Does delivery matter? Examining pandemic vaccination preferences across time and countries using a discrete choice experiment. Social Science & Medicine 2025;366:117637 View
  23. Xu Y, Xiao D, Li Y, Hu L. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Measure the Preferences of Older People for Home Care Services in China. Nursing & Health Sciences 2025;27(1) View
  24. Antonini M, Genie M, Attwell K, Attema A, Ward J, Melegaro A, Torbica A, Kelly B, Berardi C, Sequeira A, McGregor N, Kellner A, Brammli-Greenberg S, Hinwood M, Murauskienė L, Behmane D, Balogh Z, Hagen T, Paolucci F. Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries. Social Science & Medicine 2025;366:117687 View
  25. Senanayake S, Barnett A, Brain D, Allen M, Powell E, O’Beirne J, Valery P, Hickman I, Kularatna S. A discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for a chronic disease screening programme in Queensland, Australia: designing the choice sets for the final survey. F1000Research 2025;14:96 View
  26. Wang Y, Ho P, Mou L, Li J. Women’s preferences for testing to predict breast cancer risk – a discrete choice experiment. Journal of Translational Medicine 2025;23(1) View
  27. Moglia M, Tapsuwan S, Ghaderi H, Nygaard C, Dia H, Smith D. Who doesn’t like a battery electric truck? Heterogeneous motivations in the uptake of low-emissions trucks in Australia. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2025;193:104396 View
  28. Ren Y, Yang L, Wang W, Lv R, Fang X, Wang Y, Zhong J. Preferences of community-dwelling older adults with multimorbidity for digital empowerment interventions: Protocol for a discrete choice experiment study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2025;11 View
  29. Chen N, Bai D, Ning J. A determination of patient preferences for China online outpatient follow-up clinics by using discrete choice experiment: an exploratory study. Frontiers in Public Health 2025;13 View
  30. Ho T, Engel L, Ride J, Le L, Melvin G, Le H, Mihalopoulos C. Young People’s Preferences for Web-Based Mental Health Interventions for Managing Anxiety and Depression: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2025;23(4):737 View
  31. Marisetty V, Nema S. Smallholder farmers and aggregation success: a stakeholders’ perspective. Applied Economics 2025:1 View
  32. Choi S, Templin T, Glenn D. Preferences for couple-based smoking cessation interventions among couples who smoke: online discrete choice experiment. Health Education Research 2025;40(3) View
  33. Lee J, Kim J, Choi M, Shin J. A choice based conjoint analysis of mobile healthcare application preferences among physicians, patients, and individuals. npj Digital Medicine 2025;8(1) View
  34. Pinborg E, Laursen S, Thein D, Vittrup I, Schlapbach C, Maul J, Dégboé B, Egeberg A, Thomsen S, Thyssen J, Christensen M. Preferences in atopic dermatitis: A systematic review. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2025;39(9):1567 View
  35. Sucher C, Norman R, Chaffey E, Bennett R, Ferguson M, Spratley J. Patient preferences for Remote cochlear implant management: A discrete choice experiment. PLOS One 2025;20(6):e0320421 View
  36. Gribben J, Bachy E, Ray M, Krupsky K, Beusterien K, Kopenhafer L, Beygi S, Best T, Ball G, Will O, Palivela M, Patel A, Ghione P. Patient and physician treatment preferences in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a discrete choice experiment in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Brazil, and Japan. Frontiers in Oncology 2025;15 View
  37. Zhang J, Li L, Xi H, Wang Q, Jiang F, Sun X, Qiao X, Xu A. Cancer patient preferences for traditional Chinese medicine treatment: a discrete choice experiment study. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 2025;25(1) View
  38. Alemu M, Norman R, Dantas J, Belay D, Haile T, Pereira G, Tessema G. Stated preferences of adolescents and young adults for sexual and reproductive health services in Africa: a systematic review. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 2025;33(1) View
  39. Zhou X, Checco J, Akber M, Aziz A. Factors influencing consumer preferences for sustainably produced rice: A systematic review. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption 2025;18:100309 View
  40. Hamamoto Y, Inagawa A, Yamamoto T, Ito H, Matsumoto H. A discrete choice experiment to assess treatment preferences for patients with esophageal cancer in Japan. Esophagus 2025;22(4):574 View
  41. Savira F, Frith M, Nguyen D, Norman R, Senyel D, Boyd J, Robinson S. The use of discrete choice experiments in evaluating telehealth: a systematic review. Health Policy 2025;161:105421 View
  42. Shah M, Solem C, Liao A, Bell K, Wang Y, Yang H, Meng Y, Ye M, Tapan U. Patient and Physician Preferences for Maintenance Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Insights into Treatment Selection. Advances in Therapy 2025;42(11):5499 View
  43. Gazal K, Eastman B, Cheye S, Arano K, Dahle G. Understanding Family Forest Landowners’ Preferences for Carbon Offset Programs in Central Appalachia. Forests 2025;16(9):1415 View
  44. Krampf L, Hedberg C, Hauber B, Walmsley A, Firestone M. Factors Influencing Foodborne Illness Self-Identification From User-Generated Data – Minnesota, 2024. Journal of Food Protection 2025;88(11):100612 View
  45. Gidlow C, Sams L, Riley V, Ellis N, Povey R, Nolan A, Walsh G, Green H, Thompson K. Feasibility study of a digital NHS Health Check. BMC Digital Health 2025;3(1) View
  46. Violette L, Delacruz J, Niemann L, Cannon C, Stekler J, Katz D. Preferences for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Products and Delivery Models Among Cisgender Men, Transgender Persons, and Nonbinary Individuals Who Have Sex With Men in Seattle, Washington: A Discrete Choice Experiment. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2025;100(2):105 View
  47. Manson A, Golley R, Brown V, McCann D, Johnson B. Exploring Australian parent preferences for a school-provided meal offering using a discrete choice experiment. Appetite 2026;217:108335 View
  48. Ashaye A, Ramachandran N, Quaife M, Wu Y, Gutiérrez-Vargas Á, Jiongco A, Kota V, Savani B, Thomas C. Oncologists’ preferences for frontline TKI treatment of Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a discrete choice experiment. Future Oncology 2025;21(25):3329 View
  49. Najafi M, Hallajian H, Eshik Aghasi M, Golshekan M, Rahbar-Taramsari M, Davoudi kiakalayeh A, Homaie Rad E. Helmet feature preferences and willingness to pay among iranian motorcyclists: A discrete choice experiment. Traffic Injury Prevention 2025:1 View
  50. Fabianek P, Madlener R. Willing to wait? Acceptance of load management at e-vehicle charging stations. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 2025;34:101677 View
  51. Mishkin K, Li Q, Earla J, Mejia J, Hirshfield K, Krupsky K, Lankin J, Beusterien K, Mulvihill E, Honomichl R, Gordon A, Xu X. Factors influencing Patient Preferences for BRCA Testing and Adjuvant Therapy in HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer in the United States: Best–Worst Scaling and Discrete Choice Experiment. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2025 View
  52. Tobin D, Pfaff A, Monroy D, Salgado-Almeida B, Kiefer A, Garces D. Can large-scale technology raise small-miner income and reduce mercury? Prospects for female waste-rock collectors selling ore to non-mercury processing plants. Environment and Development Economics 2025:1 View
  53. Zhu X, Stroud A, Minteer S, Yoo D, Ridgeway J, Mooghali M, Miller J, Barry B. Key information influencing patient decision-making about AI in healthcare: A survey experiment (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2025 View
  54. Sun X, Zhang J, Wu Y, Duan T, Min H. Preferences for Health Science Popularization Short Videos Among Older Adults in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Journal of Applied Gerontology 2025 View
  55. Le H, Coulter J, Culver K, Cappelleri J, Rifi N, Lu H, Quaife M, Meginnis K, Fernandez G, Vaghela S, Hauber B, Stinchcombe T. Patient and oncologist preferences for ALK+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments: a discrete choice experiment in the United States. Lung Cancer 2026;211:108850 View
  56. Maina C, Kaggiah A, Barthold D, Tran J, Saldarriaga E, Simoni J, Hauber B, Kinuthia J, Graham S. Adaptation and pilot testing of a discrete choice experiment and survey on patient preferences for long-acting antiretroviral therapies for HIV in Kenya. AIDS Care 2025:1 View
  57. Checco J, Demont M, Coote L, Schulze M, Permani R, Muflikh Y, Mitchell J, Aziz A. Do consumers prefer multidimensional or multiple single-issue sustainability labels? Evidence from rice markets in Germany and Singapore. Food Quality and Preference 2025:105812 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Obahiagbon E, Kosoe E. Sustainable Strategies for Air Pollution Mitigation. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Fabianek P, Madlener R. 2024 20th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM). Willing to Wait? Acceptance for Load Management at e-Vehicle Charging Stations in Germany View