This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Physician and Health Services Rating by Consumers (126) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (485)

Published on in Vol 22, No 9 (2020): September

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15916, first published .
Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review

Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review

Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Pavankumar Mulgund1 Author Orcid Image ;   Raj Sharman1 Author Orcid Image ;   Priya Anand2 Author Orcid Image ;   Shashank Shekhar1 Author Orcid Image ;   Priya Karadi2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (15) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Ndabu T, Mulgund P, Sharman R, Singh R. Perceptual Gaps Between Clinicians and Technologists on Health Information Technology-Related Errors in Hospitals: Observational Study. JMIR Human Factors 2021;8(1):e21884 View
  2. Gross C, Scott D, Samora J, Khan M, Kang D, Frank R. Physician-Rating Websites and Social Media Usage: A Global Survey of Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2022;104(2):e5 View
  3. Leong V, Raheel K, Sim J, Kacker K, Karlaftis V, Vassiliu C, Kalaivanan K, Chen S, Robbins T, Sahakian B, Kourtzi Z. A New Remote Guided Method for Supervised Web-Based Cognitive Testing to Ensure High-Quality Data: Development and Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(1):e28368 View
  4. Roth C, Papassotiropoulos A, Brühl A, Lang U, Huber C. Psychiatry in the Digital Age: A Blessing or a Curse?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(16):8302 View
  5. Guetz B, Bidmon S, Dür M. Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria. PLOS ONE 2022;17(12):e0278510 View
  6. Zhou Y, Zhu L, Wu C, Huang S, Wang Q. Do the rich grow richer? An empirical analysis of the Matthew effect in an online healthcare community. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2022;52:101125 View
  7. McCormick J, Patel M, Hodakowski A, Rea P, Naik K, Cohn M, Mehta N, Damodar D, Abboud J, Garrigues G. Social media use by shoulder and elbow surgeons increases the number of ratings on physician review websites. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2021;30(12):e713 View
  8. Noël R, Taramasco C, Márquez G. Standards, Processes, and Tools Used to Evaluate the Quality of Health Information Systems: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(3):e26577 View
  9. Armbruster F, Brüggmann D, Groneberg D, Bendels M. The Influence of Paid Memberships on Physician Rating Websites With the Example of the German Portal Jameda: Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e39259 View
  10. Guetz B, Bidmon S. The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review. Health Policy 2023;132:104821 View
  11. Hussain A, Hakeem-ur-Rehman , Muhammad Usman Awan . Analyzing physicians ratings and reviews landscape of a developing country (Pakistan). Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight 2021;4(2):153 View
  12. Bernardi F, Alves D, Crepaldi N, Yamada D, Lima V, Rijo R. Data Quality in Health Research: Integrative Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41446 View
  13. Kalabikhina I, Moshkin V, Kolotusha A, Kashin M, Klimenko G, Kazbekova Z. Advancing Semantic Classification: A Comprehensive Examination of Machine Learning Techniques in Analyzing Russian-Language Patient Reviews. Mathematics 2024;12(4):566 View
  14. Larsen M, Holde G, Johnsen J. Investigating Patient Satisfaction Through Web-Based Reviews of Norwegian Dentists: Quantitative Study Using the Meaning Extraction Method. Journal of Participatory Medicine 2024;16:e49262 View