This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Viewpoints and Perspectives (619) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (372)

Published on in Vol 22, No 10 (2020): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/20950, first published .
Maximizing the Potential of Patient-Reported Assessments by Using the Open-Source Concerto Platform With Computerized Adaptive Testing and Machine Learning

Maximizing the Potential of Patient-Reported Assessments by Using the Open-Source Concerto Platform With Computerized Adaptive Testing and Machine Learning

Maximizing the Potential of Patient-Reported Assessments by Using the Open-Source Concerto Platform With Computerized Adaptive Testing and Machine Learning

Authors of this article:

Conrad Harrison1 Author Orcid Image ;   Bao Sheng Loe2 Author Orcid Image ;   Przemysław Lis2 Author Orcid Image ;   Chris Sidey-Gibbons3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (27) Tweetations (10) Metrics

Journals

  1. van den Berg L, Brouwer P, Panda N, Hoogbergen M, Solsky I, Onnela J, Haynes A, Sidey-Gibbons C. Feasibility and performance of smartphone-based daily micro-surveys among patients recovering from cancer surgery. Quality of Life Research 2022;31(2):579 View
  2. Pfob A, Sidey-Gibbons C, Barr R, Duda V, Alwafai Z, Balleyguier C, Clevert D, Fastner S, Gomez C, Goncalo M, Gruber I, Hahn M, Hennigs A, Kapetas P, Lu S, Nees J, Ohlinger R, Riedel F, Rutten M, Schaefgen B, Stieber A, Togawa R, Tozaki M, Wojcinski S, Xu C, Rauch G, Heil J, Golatta M. Intelligent multi-modal shear wave elastography to reduce unnecessary biopsies in breast cancer diagnosis (INSPiRED 002): a retrospective, international, multicentre analysis. European Journal of Cancer 2022;177:1 View
  3. Fenwick E, Roldan A, Halawa O, Meshkin R, Zebardast N, Popov V, Lis P, Friedman D, Lamoureux E. Implementation of an Online Glaucoma-Specific Quality of Life Computerized Adaptive Test System in a US Glaucoma Hospital. Translational Vision Science & Technology 2022;11(2):24 View
  4. Xu C, Smith G, Chen Y, Checka C, Giordano S, Kaiser K, Lowenstein L, Ma H, Mendoza T, Peterson S, Shih Y, Shete S, Tang C, Volk R, Sidey-Gibbons C, Jayadevappa R. Short-form adaptive measure of financial toxicity from the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) study: Derivation using modern psychometric techniques. PLOS ONE 2022;17(8):e0272804 View
  5. Man R, Fenwick E, Khadka J, Wu Z, Skalicky S, Pesudovs K, Lamoureux E. Psychometric Evaluation of Glaucoma Quality of Life Item Banks (GlauCAT) and Initial Assessment Using Computerized Adaptive Testing. Translational Vision Science & Technology 2022;11(6):9 View
  6. Castaldo A, Farinotti M, Fichera M, Nanetti L, Fortuna F, Mariotti C, Solari A. Italian cross-cultural adaptation of the patient-reported outcome measure of ataxia. Neurological Sciences 2023;44(8):2773 View
  7. Harrison C, Apon I, Ardouin K, Sidey-Gibbons C, Klassen A, Cano S, Wong Riff K, Pusic A, Versnel S, Koudstaal M, Allori A, Rogers-Vizena C, Swan M, Furniss D, Rodrigues J. The Development, Deployment, and Evaluation of the CLEFT-Q Computerized Adaptive Test: A Multimethods Approach Contributing to Personalized, Person-Centered Health Assessments in Plastic Surgery. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41870 View
  8. Fenwick E, Lim B, Man R, Baskaran M, Nongpiur M, Sng C, Iyer J, Husain R, Perera S, Wong T, Low J, Loe B, Huang O, Lun K, Aung T, Lamoureux E. Measuring glaucoma quality of life in an Asian population using item banking: psychometric evaluation and computerized adaptive testing simulations. Quality of Life Research 2023;32(9):2667 View
  9. Teunissen J, Hovius S, Ulrich D, Issa F, Rodrigues J, Harrison C. Computerized adaptive testing for the patient evaluation measure (PEM) in patients undergoing cubital tunnel syndrome surgery. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) 2023;48(10):1042 View
  10. Harrison C, Plessen C, Liegl G, Rodrigues J, Sabah S, Beard D, Fischer F. Item response theory assumptions were adequately met by the Oxford hip and knee scores. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2023;158:166 View
  11. DEMİR S, ÇOBANOĞLU AKTAN D, GÜLER N. Application of the professional maturity scale as a computerized adaptive testing. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 2023;10(3):580 View
  12. Harrison C, Trickett R, Wormald J, Dobbs T, Lis P, Popov V, Beard D, Rodrigues J. Remote Symptom Monitoring With Ecological Momentary Computerized Adaptive Testing: Pilot Cohort Study of a Platform for Frequent, Low-Burden, and Personalized Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e47179 View
  13. Man R, Goh K, Lee E, Lim J, Ang M, Hoang Q, Wong C, Saw S, Fenwick E, Lamoureux E. Identifying Content for an Item Bank to Measure the Quality-of-Life Impact of Myopia Refractive Interventions. Translational Vision Science & Technology 2023;12(5):27 View
  14. Cheng Y. Concerto Software for Computerized Adaptive Testing – Free Version. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 2023;21(3):194 View
  15. Liang M, Ye Z. Patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: Integration with computerized adaptive testing. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing 2023;10(12):100323 View
  16. Park B, Drolet B, Perdikis G. Vanderbilt Mini-PROM–Breast for Breast Reconstruction: A Short-Form, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2024;153(2):291e View
  17. Fenwick E, Man R, Lim B, Baskaran M, Nongpiur M, Sng C, Iyer J, Husain R, Perera S, Wong T, Low J, Huang O, Lun K, Loe B, Aung T, Lamoureux E. Efficiency, Precision, Validity, and Reliability of GlauCAT-Asian Computerized Adaptive Tests in Measuring Glaucoma-Related Quality of Life. Translational Vision Science & Technology 2024;13(2):6 View
  18. Kwan Y, Fenwick E, Leung Y, Fong W, Woon T, Xiang L, Lamoureux E, Thumboo J, Botero Carvajal A. Establishing language and ethnic equivalence for health-related quality of life item banks and testing their efficiency via computerised adaptive testing simulations. PLOS ONE 2024;19(2):e0298141 View
  19. Wang J, Xie Y, Feng Z, Li J. Psychometric properties of computerized adaptive testing for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient-reported outcome measurement. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2024;22(1) View
  20. Kajitani S, Liddy N, Harms D, Kajitani K, Kelly J. Handy insights: Could online patient-reported outcome measures be used to assess hand injury rehabilitation?. MethodsX 2024;13:103029 View
  21. Oladele J. Computerised adaptive method for assessing university undergraduates’ mental well-being within an African context: An open-source set-up with Concerto. MethodsX 2025;14:103140 View
  22. Fiandeiro M, Cordray H, Vaile J, Struble S, Banala M, Pehnke M, Shah A, Mendenhall S. Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pediatric Upper Extremity Function. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 2025;45(8):508 View
  23. Feierabend M, Wolfgart J, Praster M, Danalache M, Migliorini F, Hofmann U. Applications of machine learning and deep learning in musculoskeletal medicine: a narrative review. European Journal of Medical Research 2025;30(1) View
  24. González‐Pérez M, Barrio A, Susi R, Pérez‐Garmendia C, Antona B. Development and initial validation of DESCAQ: A Rasch‐based computer‐adaptive questionnaire for assessing digital eye strain. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2025;45(6):1326 View
  25. Khatri C, Clement N, MacDonald D, Scott C, Metcalfe A, Rodrigues J, Harrison C. Combining four patient-reported outcome measurement instruments to develop a common metric computerized adaptive test to measure outcome after total knee arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal 2025;107-B(9):885 View
  26. de Wet C, Clement N, Williamson T. Are Currently Available Joint-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Fit for Purpose to Assess the Outcome of Knee Arthroplasty?. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2025;14(22):8073 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Harrison C, Sidey-Gibbons C. Handbook of Quality of Life in Cancer. View