Published on in Vol 21, No 10 (2019): October

Identifying the Most Autonomy-Supportive Message Frame in Digital Health Communication: A 2x2 Between-Subjects Experiment

Identifying the Most Autonomy-Supportive Message Frame in Digital Health Communication: A 2x2 Between-Subjects Experiment

Identifying the Most Autonomy-Supportive Message Frame in Digital Health Communication: A 2x2 Between-Subjects Experiment

Journals

  1. Altendorf M, Hoving C, Van Weert J, Smit E. Effectiveness of Message Frame-Tailoring in a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e17251 View
  2. Jeno L, Dettweiler U, Grytnes J. The effects of a goal-framing and need-supportive app on undergraduates' intentions, effort, and achievement in mobile science learning. Computers & Education 2020;159:104022 View
  3. Ayre J, Cvejic E, Bonner C, Turner R, Walter S, McCaffery K, Basu S. Effects of health literacy, screening, and participant choice on action plans for reducing unhealthy snacking in Australia: A randomised controlled trial. PLOS Medicine 2020;17(11):e1003409 View
  4. Riley A, Critchlow E, Birkenstock L, Itzoe M, Senter K, Holmes N, Buffer S. Vignettes as research tools in global health communication: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2020. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 2021;14(4):283 View
  5. Kong S. Examining the Effect of Self-Determined Appeal Organ Donation Messages and Respective Underlying Mechanism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(17):10619 View
  6. Carter E, Vadari H, Stoll S, Rogers B, Resnicow K, Heisler M, Herman W, Kim H, McEwen L, Volpp K, Kullgren J. Study protocol: Behavioral economics and self-determination theory to change diabetes risk (BEST Change). Contemporary Clinical Trials 2023;124:107038 View
  7. Resnicow K, Catley D, Goggin K, Hawley S, Williams G. Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Theoretical Perspectives for Why It Works and For Whom. Medical Decision Making 2022;42(6):755 View
  8. Sassi-Chamsi H, Helme-Guizon A, Gerard J. Renforcer l’efficacité des messages persuasifs en santé sur Facebook : effets du ton et de la distance sociale sur l’intention d’arrêter de fumer. Décisions Marketing 2022;N° 107(3):31 View
  9. de Ruijter D, Mergelsberg E, Crone M, Smit E, Hoving C. Identifying Active Ingredients, Working Mechanisms, and Fidelity Characteristics Reported in Smoking Cessation Interventions in Dutch Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2022;24(5):654 View
  10. Lungu D, Røislien J, Berg S, Smeets I, Shortt M, Thune H, Brønnick K. Assessing the Effect of Nonvisual Information Factors in Pandemic-Related Video Communication: Randomized Controlled Between-Subjects Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e42528 View
  11. Cascalheira C, Pugh T, Hong C, Birkett M, Macapagal K, Holloway I. Developing technology-based interventions for infectious diseases: ethical considerations for young sexual and gender minority people. Frontiers in Reproductive Health 2023;5 View
  12. Sassi-Chamsi H, Helme-Guizon A, Gerard J. Enhancing the effectiveness of persuasive health messages on Facebook: Effects of tone and social distance on intention to quit smoking. Décisions Marketing 2022;N° 107(3):189 View
  13. Smit E, Kirch M, Resnicow K. The health communication orientations scale: Development and two-country validation of a questionnaire that measures health communication style preferences. Patient Education and Counseling 2024;126:108330 View
  14. Solovei A, Daal G, Smit E. The Effects of Choice and Autonomy-Supportive Language in Health Messages Aimed at Cancer Prevention. European Journal of Health Psychology 2024;31(3):101 View