Published on in Vol 20, No 6 (2018): June

Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis

Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis

Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis

Authors of this article:

Fabia Rothenfluh1 Author Orcid Image ;   Peter J Schulz1 Author Orcid Image

Journals

  1. Zwier S. Webcare in healthcare: providers' responses to patients' online reviews. British Journal of Healthcare Management 2019;25(10):1 View
  2. Strumann C, Flägel K, Emcke T, Steinhäuser J. Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany. BMC Family Practice 2018;19(1) View
  3. McLennan S. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e14336 View
  4. McLennan S. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816 View
  5. McLennan S. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e18374 View
  6. Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e13830 View
  7. Schulz P, Rothenfluh F. Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e14134 View
  8. Mulgund P, Sharman R, Anand P, Shekhar S, Karadi P. Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e15916 View
  9. Yan Q, Jensen K, Thomas R, Field A, Jiang Z, Goei C, Davies M. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study. JMIR Cardio 2021;5(1):e22975 View
  10. Zhao H, Luu M, Spiegel B, Daskivich T. Correlation of Online Physician Rating Subscores and Association With Overall Satisfaction: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e11258 View
  11. Meszmer N. Eine Trendanalyse von über 190 000 Onlinebewertungen von Orthopäden über die letzten 11 Jahre. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 2021;26(03):141 View
  12. Basa K, Jabbour N, Rohlfing M, Schmoker S, Lawlor C, Levi J, Sobin L, Tracy J, Tracy L. Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 2021;130(12):1317 View
  13. Shah A, Naqvi R, Jeong O. The Impact of Signals Transmission on Patients’ Choice through E-Consultation Websites: An Econometric Analysis of Secondary Datasets. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(10):5192 View
  14. Emmert M, McLennan S. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(7):e24229 View
  15. Meredith A. The healthcare hunger games. JAAPA 2022;35(2):8 View
  16. Fang J, Wen L, Ren H, Wen C. The effect of technical and functional quality on online physician selection: Moderation effect of competition intensity. Information Processing & Management 2022;59(4):102969 View
  17. Ninkov A, Sedig K. A Framework for Online Public Health Debates: Some Design Elements for Visual Analytics Systems. Information 2022;13(4):201 View
  18. Mainard N, Le Van T, Saghbini E, Madkouri R, Grelat M, Chapon R. La e-réputation des chirurgiens du rachis français : quels sont les facteurs les plus fréquemment associés aux avis en ligne ?. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 2023;109(6):826 View
  19. Armbruster F, Brüggmann D, Groneberg D, Bendels M. The Influence of Paid Memberships on Physician Rating Websites With the Example of the German Portal Jameda: Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e39259 View
  20. Guetz B, Bidmon S. The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review. Health Policy 2023;132:104821 View
  21. Hussain A, Hakeem-ur-Rehman , Muhammad Usman Awan . Analyzing physicians ratings and reviews landscape of a developing country (Pakistan). Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight 2021;4(2):153 View
  22. Mainard N, Pelletier Y, Baland O, Huneidi M, Le Petit L, Laine G, Finoco M, Chatelain L, Chapon R. Chirurgie du rachis : enquête sur la réputation en ligne du chirurgien auprès de 230 patients. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 2023;109(6):831 View
  23. Vasan V, Cheng C, Lerner D, Vujovic D, van Gerwen M, Iloreta A. A natural language processing approach to uncover patterns among online ratings of otolaryngologists. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2023;137(12):1384 View
  24. Bhaumik D, Schlesinger M, Clark M. How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians. PLOS ONE 2023;18(12):e0295243 View
  25. Reilley J, Pflueger D, Huber C. A typology of evaluative health platforms: Commercial interests and their implications for patient voice. Social Science & Medicine 2024;350:116946 View