This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (679) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (773) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (573) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (787) Design and Usability of Consumer Health Tech and Home Monitoring Devices (218)

Published on in Vol 20, No 3 (2018): March

Effect of Harm Anchors in Visual Displays of Test Results on Patient Perceptions of Urgency About Near-Normal Values: Experimental Study

Effect of Harm Anchors in Visual Displays of Test Results on Patient Perceptions of Urgency About Near-Normal Values: Experimental Study

Effect of Harm Anchors in Visual Displays of Test Results on Patient Perceptions of Urgency About Near-Normal Values: Experimental Study

Authors of this article:

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Aaron M Scherer3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Holly O Witteman5, 6, 7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   Jacob B Solomon3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicole L Exe3 Author Orcid Image ;   Angela Fagerlin9, 10 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (17) Tweetations (30) Metrics

Journals

  1. Lor M, Koleck T, Bakken S. Information visualizations of symptom information for patients and providers: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2019;26(2):162 View
  2. Zikmund-Fisher B, Solomon J, Scherer A, Exe N, Tarini B, Fagerlin A, Witteman H. Primary Care Providers’ Preferences and Concerns Regarding Specific Visual Displays for Returning Hemoglobin A1c Test Results to Patients. Medical Decision Making 2019;39(7):796 View
  3. Shaffer V, Wegier P, Valentine K, Belden J, Canfield S, Patil S, Popescu M, Steege L, Jain A, Koopman R. Patient Judgments About Hypertension Control: The Role of Variability, Trends, and Outliers in Visualized Blood Pressure Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(3):e11366 View
  4. Scherer A, Reisinger H, Goto M, Goedken C, Clore G, Marra A, Chasco E, Evans C, Rubin M, Perencevich E. Testing a novel audit and feedback method for hand hygiene compliance: A multicenter quality improvement study. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2019;40(1):89 View
  5. Zikmund-Fisher B. Helping People Know Whether Measurements Have Good or Bad Implications: Increasing the Evaluability of Health and Science Data Communications. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2019;6(1):29 View
  6. Asan O, Scanlon M, Crotty B, Holden R, Flynn K. Parental Perceptions of Displayed Patient Data in a PICU: An Example of Unintentional Empowerment*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2019;20(5):435 View
  7. Zhang Z, Citardi D, Xing A, Luo X, Lu Y, He Z. Patient Challenges and Needs in Comprehending Laboratory Test Results: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e18725 View
  8. Witteman H, Zikmund-Fisher B. Communicating laboratory results to patients and families. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 2019;57(3):359 View
  9. Vincent C, Wegier P, Chien V, Kurahashi A, Ginsburg S, Molla Ghanbari H, Wolfstadt J, Cram P. Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel Educational Tool to Communicate Individualized Hip Fracture Prognostic Information to Patients and Surrogates: My Hip Fracture (My-HF). Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation 2021;12 View
  10. Dimara E, Bailly G, Bezerianos A, Franconeri S. Mitigating the Attraction Effect with Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2019;25(1):850 View
  11. Kim M, Heitkemper E, Hébert E, Hecht J, Crawford A, Nnaka T, Hutson T, Rhee H, Radhakrishnan K. Redesigning culturally tailored intervention in the precision health era: Self-management science context. Nursing Outlook 2022;70(5):710 View
  12. Zhang Z, Kmoth L, Luo X, He Z. User-Centered System Design for Communicating Clinical Laboratory Test Results: Design and Evaluation Study. JMIR Human Factors 2021;8(4):e26017 View
  13. Lazaro G. When Positive is Negative: Health Literacy Barriers to Patient Access to Clinical Laboratory Test Results. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine 2023;8(6):1133 View
  14. He Z, Bhasuran B, Jin Q, Tian S, Hanna K, Shavor C, Arguello L, Murray P, Lu Z. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e56655 View
  15. van der Mee F, Schaper F, Jansen J, Bons J, Meex S, Cals J. Enhancing Patient Understanding of Laboratory Test Results: Systematic Review of Presentation Formats and Their Impact on Perception, Decision, Action, and Memory. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e53993 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Peaslee M, Nelson J, Reed E, Sexton L. Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics. View
  2. Sheng Z, Jun G, Balatsoukas P. HCI International 2023 Posters. View