This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (418) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (590) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (230) Back Pain (85)

Published on in Vol 20 , No 10 (2018) :October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9828, first published .
Responsiveness, Reliability, and Minimally Important and Minimal Detectable Changes of 3 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain: Validation Study

Responsiveness, Reliability, and Minimally Important and Minimal Detectable Changes of 3 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain: Validation Study

Responsiveness, Reliability, and Minimally Important and Minimal Detectable Changes of 3 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain: Validation Study

Authors of this article:

Robert Froud 1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Carol Fawkes 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jonathan Foss 1, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Martin Underwood 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Dawn Carnes 3, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (16) Tweetations (6) Metrics
Robert Froud 1, 2 , PhD ;   Carol Fawkes 3 , PhD ;   Jonathan Foss 1, 4 , PhD ;   Martin Underwood 1 , MBChB, MD (UK) ;   Dawn Carnes 3, 5 , PhD

1 Clinical Trials Unit , Warwick Medical School , University of Warwick , Coventry , GB

2 Institute of Health Sciences , Kristiania University College , Oslo , NO

3 Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry , Queen Mary University of London , London , GB

4 Department of Computer Science , University of Warwick , Coventry , GB

5 Faculty of Health , University of Applied Sciences and the Arts , Western Switzerland , CH

Corresponding Author: