This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Physician and Health Services Rating by Consumers (126)

Published on in Vol 19, No 8 (2017): August

Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation

Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation

Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation

Authors of this article:

Gregory P Murphy1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mohannad A Awad1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   E Charles Osterberg3 Author Orcid Image ;   Thomas W Gaither4 Author Orcid Image ;   Thanabhudee Chumnarnsongkhroh1 Author Orcid Image ;   Samuel L Washington1 Author Orcid Image ;   Benjamin N Breyer1, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (25) Tweetations (16) Metrics

Journals

  1. Murphy G, Awad M, Tresh A, Gaither T, Osterberg E, Baradaran N, Breyer B. Association of Patient Volume With Online Ratings of California Urologists. JAMA Surgery 2018;153(7):685 View
  2. Cheshire W. Autonomic medical practice viewed through the lens of physician-rating websites. Clinical Autonomic Research 2020;30(4):335 View
  3. Liu J, Matelski J, Bell C. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(3):e76 View
  4. Liu J, Goldberg H, Lentz E, Matelski J, Alam A, Bell C. Association Between Web-Based Physician Ratings and Physician Disciplinary Convictions: Retrospective Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(5):e16708 View
  5. McGrath R, Priestley J, Zhou Y, Culligan P. The Validity of Online Patient Ratings of Physicians: Analysis of Physician Peer Reviews and Patient Ratings. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2018;7(1):e8 View
  6. McLennan S. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816 View
  7. McLennan S. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e18374 View
  8. Hong Y, Liang C, Radcliff T, Wigfall L, Street R. What Do Patients Say About Doctors Online? A Systematic Review of Studies on Patient Online Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e12521 View
  9. Mulgund P, Sharman R, Anand P, Shekhar S, Karadi P. Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e15916 View
  10. Goyal D, Guttag J, Syed Z, Mehta R, Elahi Z, Saeed M. Comparing Precision Machine Learning With Consumer, Quality, and Volume Metrics for Ranking Orthopedic Surgery Hospitals: Retrospective Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e22765 View
  11. Emmert M, McLennan S. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(7):e24229 View
  12. Hyman D, Liu J, Black B. Should Patients Use Online Reviews to Pick Their Doctor? Lessons from Illinois and Indiana. SSRN Electronic Journal 2021 View
  13. Gates M, McLachlan I, Butler S, Weston J. Building Veterinarians beyond Veterinary School: Challenges and Opportunities for Continuing Professional Development in Veterinary Medicine. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 2021;48(4):383 View
  14. Hyman D, Liu J, Black B. Should patients use online reviews to pick their doctors and hospitals?. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2022;19(4):897 View
  15. Saifee D, Hudnall M, Raja U. Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians’ Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(4):e31659 View
  16. Brinkman J, Pollock J, Arthur J, Smith J, Lin K, Chang M. Characterizing negative reviews of orthopedic spine surgeons and practices. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ) 2022;11:100126 View
  17. Placona A, Rathert C. Are Online Patient Reviews Associated With Health Care Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Medical Care Research and Review 2022;79(1):3 View
  18. Murasko M, Ivanov D, Roe A, Kamal R, Amanatullah D. Patient Satisfaction Scores Are a Poor Metric of Orthopedic Care. Orthopedics 2022;45(3) View
  19. Pando A, Delprete C, Su J, Edobor-Osula F. Analysis of physician characteristics and factors influencing the online recommendation of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons: a cross-sectional study. Current Orthopaedic Practice 2022;33(6):600 View
  20. Sand J. The Online Physician Image. Surgical Clinics of North America 2022;102(2):233 View
  21. Qubain L, Richman E, Eaton V, Brinkman J, Goulding K, Agarwal M. Analysis of Negative Reviews of Orthopedic Oncology Surgeons: An Investigation of Reviews from Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google. Sarcoma 2022;2022:1 View
  22. Guetz B, Bidmon S. The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review. Health Policy 2023;132:104821 View
  23. Shaw N, Hills N, Holler J, Fernandez A, Davis D, Palmer N, Sliwka D, Breyer B. The Impact of Patient–Physician Racial and Gender Concordance on Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Clinic Visits. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 2024;11(4):2083 View
  24. Kim J, Tawk K, Kim J, Shahbaz H, Lipton J, Haidar Y, Tjoa T, Abouzari M. Online ratings and narrative comments of American Head and Neck Society surgeons. Head & Neck 2024 View
  25. Artz N, Dalton J, Ramanathan R, Lin R, Sadhwani S, Como C, Oyekan A, Tang Y, Li V, Nwankwo J, Lee J, Shaw J. Characterizing Negative Online Reviews of Spine Surgeons. Spine 2024;49(11):E154 View