This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

e-Learning and Medical Education (692) Epublishing and Open Access (86) Continuing Medical Education (CME) for Doctors (124)

Published on in Vol 19, No 4 (2017): April

An Analysis of 2.3 Million Participations in the Continuing Medical Education Program of a General Medical Journal: Suitability, User Characteristics, and Evaluation by Readers

An Analysis of 2.3 Million Participations in the Continuing Medical Education Program of a General Medical Journal: Suitability, User Characteristics, and Evaluation by Readers

An Analysis of 2.3 Million Participations in the Continuing Medical Education Program of a General Medical Journal: Suitability, User Characteristics, and Evaluation by Readers

Authors of this article:

Hildegard Christ1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jeremy Franklin1 Author Orcid Image ;   Reinhard Griebenow2 Author Orcid Image ;   Christopher Baethge3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Beaufils P, Migaud H, Augereau B, Léger P, Mainard D, Fitoussi F. Quelle est la perception de RCOT-OTSR ? Résultats d’une enquête de lectorat. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 2019;105(8):954 View
  2. Barnett A, Mewburn I, Schroter S. Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living: observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time. BMJ 2019:l6460 View
  3. Petersen J, Bray L, Østergaard D. Continuing professional development (CPD) for anesthetists: A systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2024;68(1):2 View