This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1641) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (479)

Published on in Vol 19, No 2 (2017): February

Scientific Misconduct and Social Media: Role of Twitter in the Stimulus Triggered Acquisition of Pluripotency Cells Scandal

Scientific Misconduct and Social Media: Role of Twitter in the Stimulus Triggered Acquisition of Pluripotency Cells Scandal

Scientific Misconduct and Social Media: Role of Twitter in the Stimulus Triggered Acquisition of Pluripotency Cells Scandal

Authors of this article:

Yuya Sugawara1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Tetsuya Tanimoto4 Author Orcid Image ;   Shoko Miyagawa5 Author Orcid Image ;   Masayasu Murakami2 Author Orcid Image ;   Atsushi Tsuya1 Author Orcid Image ;   Atsushi Tanaka6 Author Orcid Image ;   Masahiro Kami7 Author Orcid Image ;   Hiroto Narimatsu3, 8 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (143) Metrics

Journals

  1. Gayle A, Shimaoka M. Public Response to Scientific Misconduct: Assessing Changes in Public Sentiment Toward the Stimulus-Triggered Acquisition of Pluripotency (STAP) Cell Case via Twitter. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2017;3(2):e21 View
  2. Meskus M, Marelli L, D’Agostino G. Research Misconduct in the Age of Open Science: The Case of STAP Stem Cells. Science as Culture 2018;27(1):1 View
  3. Omoya Y, Akashi J, Kaigo M. Data visualization of texts in the transitions of framing Indochinese refugees by Japanese television documentaries. Quality & Quantity 2020;54(4):1363 View
  4. Tauginienė L, Kalinauskaitė R. Participation of doctoral students in online social networks. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 2018;9(2):144 View
  5. Sotudeh H, Barahmand N, Yousefi Z, Yaghtin M. How do academia and society react to erroneous or deceitful claims? The case of retracted articles’ recognition. Journal of Information Science 2022;48(2):182 View
  6. Teixeira da Silva J, Dobránszki J. A new dimension in publishing ethics: social media-based ethics-related accusations. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 2019;17(3):354 View
  7. Souza-Junior E, Rosa R, Guedes T, Silva C, Ribeiro D, Balbinote F, de Souza D, Teixeira R, Silva Filho B, Sawada N. Ética e bioética no mundo científico: uma revisão integrativa. Persona y Bioética 2020;24(2):151 View
  8. Haunschild R, Bornmann L. Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers. Scientometrics 2021;126(6):5181 View
  9. Amiri M, Yaghtin M, Sotudeh H. How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers. Scientometrics 2024;129(1):261 View
  10. Yuan C, Yong Z. Procedures and Principles of Disposal of Research Misconduct in Japan From the Perspective of Case Analysis. Sage Open 2021;11(4) View