This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Physician and Health Services Rating by Consumers (126)

Published on in Vol 19, No 11 (2017): November

Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities

Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities

Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities

Authors of this article:

Stuart McLennan1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Daniel Strech2 Author Orcid Image ;   Andrea Meyer3 Author Orcid Image ;   Hannes Kahrass2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (15) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e13830 View
  2. Han X, Qu J, Zhang T. Exploring the impact of review valence, disease risk, and trust on patient choice based on online physician reviews. Telematics and Informatics 2019;45:101276 View
  3. McLennan S, Strech D, Kahrass H. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1) View
  4. Emmert M, Kast K, Sander U. Characteristics and decision making of hospital report card consumers: Lessons from an onsite-based cross-sectional study. Health Policy 2019;123(11):1061 View
  5. McLennan S. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816 View
  6. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(7):e243 View
  7. Han X, Li B, Zhang T, Qu J. Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(6):e14417 View
  8. Meszmer N. Eine Trendanalyse von über 190 000 Onlinebewertungen von Orthopäden über die letzten 11 Jahre. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement 2021;26(03):141 View
  9. Mulgund P, Sharman R, Anand P, Shekhar S, Karadi P. Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e15916 View
  10. Langerhuizen D, Brown L, Doornberg J, Ring D, Kerkhoffs G, Janssen S. Analysis of Online Reviews of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Orthopaedic Practices Using Natural Language Processing. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2021;29(8):337 View
  11. Ghosh S, Chakraborty S, Gupta N, Basu S. What ails physician review websites? A study of information needs of patients. Decision Support Systems 2023;166:113897 View
  12. Chen T, Wu C, Chiu M, Hsu J, Liao M, Hsueh Y, Su W. Factors Associated with the Patient/Client Use of Report Cards, Physician Rating Websites, Social Media, and Google for Hospital and Physician Selection: A Nationwide Survey. Healthcare 2022;10(10):1931 View
  13. Guetz B, Bidmon S, Dür M. Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria. PLOS ONE 2022;17(12):e0278510 View
  14. Kalabikhina I, Moshkin V, Kolotusha A, Kashin M, Klimenko G, Kazbekova Z. Advancing Semantic Classification: A Comprehensive Examination of Machine Learning Techniques in Analyzing Russian-Language Patient Reviews. Mathematics 2024;12(4):566 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Bidmon S. Advances in Advertising Research X. View