This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832) New Methods (945)

Published on in Vol 17, No 7 (2015): July

Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial

Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial

Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Alison E Turnbull1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Cristi L O'Connor2 Author Orcid Image ;   Bryan Lau2 Author Orcid Image ;   Scott D Halpern4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Dale M Needham1, 3, 6 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Krutsinger D, Yadav K, Cooney E, Brooks S, Halpern S, Courtright K. A pilot randomized trial of five financial incentive strategies to increase study enrollment and retention rates. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2019;15:100390 View
  2. Meadow J, Thistlethwaite J, Rodrigue J, Mandelbrot D, Ross L. To tell or not to tell: attitudes of transplant surgeons and transplant nephrologists regarding the disclosure of recipient information to living kidney donors. Clinical Transplantation 2015;29(12):1203 View
  3. Schroter S, Roberts J, Loder E, Penzien D, Mahadeo S, Houle T. Biomedical authors’ awareness of publication ethics: an international survey. BMJ Open 2018;8(11):e021282 View
  4. Noel H, Huang A. The Effect of Varying Incentive Amounts on Physician Survey Response. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2019;42(1):71 View
  5. Sammut R, Griscti O, Norman I. Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2021;123:104058 View
  6. Abdelazeem B, Hamdallah A, Rizk M, Abbas K, El-Shahat N, Manasrah N, Mostafa M, Eltobgy M, Gao Z. Does usage of monetary incentive impact the involvement in surveys? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 randomized controlled trials. PLOS ONE 2023;18(1):e0279128 View
  7. Davin N. Facilitators and Barriers to Recruiting Physicians for Psychological Research: The Personal Experience of a Graduate Student. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2022;21 View
  8. Isfort M, McVerry B, Shutter L, Kim M, Lacomis D. Perceived utility of electrodiagnostic testing in critical illness myopathy and polyneuropathy: A survey of intensive care unit providers. Muscle & Nerve 2022;66(1):90 View
  9. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Woolf B, Perkins C. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(11) View
  10. Metkus T, Curran J, Lin S, Qato D, Alexander G. Assessment of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) for prasugrel (EFFIENT): A narrative review. American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice 2024;38:100359 View
  11. VanGeest J, Johnson T, Kapousouz E. Monetary Incentives in Clinician Surveys: An Analysis and Systematic Review With a Focus on Establishing Best Practices. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2024 View