This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (531)

Published on in Vol 17, No 6 (2015): June

Automated Detection of HONcode Website Conformity Compared to Manual Detection: An Evaluation

Automated Detection of HONcode Website Conformity Compared to Manual Detection: An Evaluation

Automated Detection of HONcode Website Conformity Compared to Manual Detection: An Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Célia Boyer1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ljiljana Dolamic1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (33) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Devan H, Perry M, van Hattem A, Thurlow G, Shepherd S, Muchemwa C, Grainger R. Do pain management websites foster self-management support for people with persistent pain? A scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling 2019;102(9):1590 View
  2. Oroszlányová M, Teixeira Lopes C, Nunes S, Ribeiro C. Predicting the quality of health web documents using their characteristics. Online Information Review 2018;42(7):1024 View
  3. Boyer C, Frossard C, Gaudinat A, Hanbury A, Falquetd G. How to sort trustworthy health online information? Improvements of the automated detection of HONcode criteria. Procedia Computer Science 2017;121:940 View
  4. Alhuwail D, Abdulsalam Y. Assessing Electronic Health Literacy in the State of Kuwait: Survey of Internet Users From an Arab State. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(5):e11174 View
  5. Robillard J, Jun J, Lai J, Feng T. The QUEST for quality online health information: validation of a short quantitative tool. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2018;18(1) View
  6. Alhuwail D, Abduo H, Alqabandi N, Abu-Ghefreh A, Dawwas B, Halawa N. Engagement and Usage Patterns of a Diabetes Education Website Tailored for Arabic Speakers: A Case Study of a Diabetes Website from Kuwait. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 2018;22(4):337 View
  7. Azer S, AlOlayan T, AlGhamdi M, AlSanea M. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2017;23(9):1676 View
  8. Palotti J, Zuccon G, Hanbury A. Consumer Health Search on the Web: Study of Web Page Understandability and Its Integration in Ranking Algorithms. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(1):e10986 View
  9. Issom D, Henriksen A, Woldaregay A, Rochat J, Lovis C, Hartvigsen G. Factors Influencing Motivation and Engagement in Mobile Health Among Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in Low-Prevalence, High-Income Countries: Qualitative Exploration of Patient Requirements. JMIR Human Factors 2020;7(1):e14599 View
  10. Nath C, Huh J, Adupa A, Jonnalagadda S. Website Sharing in Online Health Communities: A Descriptive Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(1):e11 View
  11. Wang F, Wang Z, Sun W, Yang X, Bian Z, Shen L, Pan W, Liu P, Chen X, Fu L, Zhang F, Luo D. Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(5):e14826 View
  12. Saunders C, Petersen C, Durand M, Bagley P, Elwyn G. Bring on the Machines: Could Machine Learning Improve the Quality of Patient Education Materials? A Systematic Search and Rapid Review. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2018;(2):1 View
  13. Whitley J, Kieran K. Accuracy and comprehensiveness of publicly-available online data about bedwetting: An actionable opportunity to improve parent and caregiver self-education. Journal of Pediatric Urology 2020;16(5):661.e1 View
  14. Arslan D, Sami Tutar M, Kozanhan B, Bagci Z. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur. Cardiology in the Young 2020;30(3):328 View
  15. Kinkead L, Allam A, Krauthammer M. AutoDiscern: rating the quality of online health information with hierarchical encoder attention-based neural networks. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2020;20(1) View
  16. Boyer C, Dolamic L, Falquet G. Language Independent Tokenization vs. Stemming in Automated Detection of Health Websites’ HONcode Conformity: An Evaluation. Procedia Computer Science 2015;64:224 View
  17. Al-Jefri M, Evans R, Lee J, Ghezzi P. Automatic Identification of Information Quality Metrics in Health News Stories. Frontiers in Public Health 2020;8 View
  18. Inglis-Jassiem G, Grimmer K, Conradie T, Louw Q. Descriptive Review of Online Information Resources for People With Stroke: Protocol for a Scoping Review. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(7):e23174 View
  19. Meppelink C, Hendriks H, Trilling D, van Weert J, Shao A, Smit E. Reliable or not? An automated classification of webpages about early childhood vaccination using supervised machine learning. Patient Education and Counseling 2021;104(6):1460 View
  20. Yılmaz F, Tutar M, Arslan D, Çeri A. Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web. Birth Defects Research 2021;113(12):901 View
  21. Song S, Zhang Y, Yu B. Interventions to support consumer evaluation of online health information credibility: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2021;145:104321 View
  22. Upadhyay R, Pasi G, Viviani M. Vec4Cred: a model for health misinformation detection in web pages. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2023;82(4):5271 View
  23. Oydanich M, Kuklinski E, Asbell P. Assessing the Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Dry Eye Disease. Cornea 2022;41(8):1023 View
  24. YARAN M, ÖZKAN E. Ergoterapi ile İlgili Çevrimiçi Bilgilerin Kalitesi ve Okunabilirliği. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 2022;10(2):45 View
  25. Da Silva T, Lokhandwala A, Al Kaabi N, Semenchuk J, Goobie G, Camacho E, Reid W, Fisher J, Ryerson C, Rozenberg D. Characterization and reliability of internet resources on pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic lung disease. Chronic Respiratory Disease 2023;20 View
  26. Kantor D, Farlow M, Ludolph A, Montaner J, Sankar R, Sawyer Jr R, Stocchi F, Lara A, Clark S, Deschet K, Ouyahia L, Hadjiat Y. Digital Scientific Platform for Independent Content in Neurology: Rigorous Quality Guideline Development and Implementation. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2022;11(1):e35698 View
  27. Hua H, Rayess N, Li A, Do D, Rahimy E. Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of “Macular Degeneration”: Critical Analysis. Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases 2022;6(6):437 View
  28. Çiftci S, Şahin E, Aktaş S, Safali S, Durgut F, Aydin B. How understandable are the patient education materials about flat foot on the Internet for parents?. Medicine 2023;102(6):e32791 View
  29. Bayani A, Ayotte A, Nikiema J. Automated Credibility Assessment of Web-Based Health Information Considering Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode): Model Development and Validation Study. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e52995 View
  30. Deng Q, Bao Y, Yang Y, Mao C. Re: David Musheyev, Alexander Pan, Stacy Loeb, Abdo E. Kabarriti. How Well Do Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Respond to the Top Search Queries About Urological Malignancies? Eur Urol 2023;85:13–6. European Urology 2024;86(2):e42 View
  31. Gültaç A. İŞ SAĞLIĞI VE GÜVENLİĞİ BAĞLAMINDA İLK YARDIM EĞİTİMLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: YOUTUBE VİDEOLARININ ANALİZİ. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 2024;12(2):556 View
  32. Solak Y, Kaya E, Kurt B, Şahin M, Acar O. What to do if there’s a nuclear attack? A quality and readability analysis of websites. Journal of Public Health 2024 View