Published on in Vol 17, No 3 (2015): March
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the ... https://t.co/xIp57dJSbR #citeNLM #mlanet19
7:08 PM · May 06, 2019
20
@eyooekpo @johntoby007 @cchukudebelu @ben_ayade A broad sweeping statement that I just had to pick up on as untrue.… https://t.co/FOtSVouYIQ
5:34 AM · Dec 27, 2019
10
JMIR: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language: Backg... http://t.co/7biu7GJeCZ
3:28 PM · Mar 04, 2015
45
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/wGFcGScdRu
3:31 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
RT @JMedInternetRes: #Wikipedia & Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, & the Significance... http://t.co/svCq0OhWo9 cc: @LaneRasberry
3:31 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural… http://t.co/DcfnKqdfXB
3:37 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/x63V8FccIb
3:50 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
MT @JMedInternetRes Wikipedia y Medicina Cifras de lectores, editores y lenguaje natural http://t.co/2xlBB7viCA
4:21 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/fFpyouLLlC
5:09 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
Concerning? Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/a7Q6xIySjw
5:31 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, & the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/vO1LUiwQvr #medlibs #canmedlibs
6:52 PM · Mar 04, 2015
10
RT @JMedInternetRes: JMIR: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language: Backg... http…
7:02 PM · Mar 04, 2015
45
RT @JMedInternetRes: JMIR: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language: Backg... http…
7:33 PM · Mar 04, 2015
45
RT @JMedInternetRes: JMIR: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language: Backg... http…
7:34 PM · Mar 04, 2015
45
RT @JMedInternetRes: JMIR: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language: Backg... http…
7:40 PM · Mar 04, 2015
45
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/hfiXaxgvNw
7:58 PM · Mar 04, 2015
20
Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http://t.co/en2BVYLger
8:38 PM · Mar 04, 2015
15
Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http://t.co/cgV9Tb05m1
8:38 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http://t.co/Um1Ab839vY
8:38 PM · Mar 04, 2015
16
RT @WikiLibrary: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http…
8:48 PM · Mar 04, 2015
16
#Wikipedia and #Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/OW1MAXU01c
8:55 PM · Mar 04, 2015
00
RT @WikiLibrary: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http…
9:00 PM · Mar 04, 2015
16
RT @WikiProjectMed: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. h…
9:04 PM · Mar 04, 2015
15
#Wikipedia & Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors & Significance of Natural Language @JMedInternetRes http://t.co/uyx6Fvmuit #medlibs
12:59 AM · Mar 05, 2015
31
RT @WikiLibrary: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http…
3:45 AM · Mar 05, 2015
16
RT @WikiLibrary: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http…
4:38 AM · Mar 05, 2015
16
MT @JMedInternetRes Wikipedia y Medicina Cifras de lectores, editores y lenguaje natural http://t.co/2xlBB7viCA
10:30 AM · Mar 05, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/jlgnSANASZ
11:16 AM · Mar 05, 2015
00
Wikipedia editors are few and dwindling on medical entries. https://t.co/VBAFg27ksv
11:18 AM · Mar 05, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/WNZQLGiedq
11:27 AM · Mar 05, 2015
01
RT @SVENNIECO: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/WNZQLGiedq
11:53 AM · Mar 05, 2015
01
Amplio análisis de Wikipedia como referente de contenido médico en @JMedInternetRes http://t.co/NtboxqACQN
12:15 PM · Mar 05, 2015
00
RT @josemiguelcacho: Amplio análisis de Wikipedia como referente de contenido médico en @JMedInternetRes http://t.co/P0aSQ2PrqI
12:25 PM · Mar 05, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/6o5zYT7oDN #healthcare #feedly
4:33 PM · Mar 05, 2015
20
HOT Most tweeted: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Sign... http://t.co/TYq5QLY1Le http://t.co/DPELEpEf5G
11:54 PM · Mar 05, 2015
01
Source d'infos médicales incontournable : Wikipedia contenait 155.805 articles médicaux en 255 langues fin 2013 http://t.co/kO9LIfNU0F #web
12:24 AM · Mar 06, 2015
00
#Wikipedia: 155,805 medical articles at end of 2013 http://t.co/kO9LIfNU0F via @JMedInternetRes #Health #information http://t.co/1mFdekA2ij
12:32 AM · Mar 06, 2015
10
RT @LaurenMaggio: #Wikipedia & Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors & Significance of Natural Language @JMedInternetRes http://t.co/uy…
2:42 AM · Mar 06, 2015
31
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership and Editors http://t.co/4RDindoqtu #ehealth @retoauer
6:48 AM · Mar 06, 2015
11
Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" http://t.co/zybvOSUeLK
2:22 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:24 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:24 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:25 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:31 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:38 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:40 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:43 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:44 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
2:52 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
300 editors/healthcare professionals wrote the world's most viewed source of medical knowledge http://t.co/yjdgjoScQV http://t.co/3S5CktrzUH
2:55 PM · Mar 06, 2015
78
RT @WikiResearch: 300 editors/healthcare professionals wrote the world's most viewed source of medical knowledge http://t.co/yjdgjoScQV htt…
2:55 PM · Mar 06, 2015
78
RT @WikiResearch: 300 editors/healthcare professionals wrote the world's most viewed source of medical knowledge http://t.co/yjdgjoScQV htt…
2:55 PM · Mar 06, 2015
78
RT @WikiResearch: 300 editors/healthcare professionals wrote the world's most viewed source of medical knowledge http://t.co/yjdgjoScQV htt…
3:03 PM · Mar 06, 2015
78
RT @WikiResearch: 300 editors/healthcare professionals wrote the world's most viewed source of medical knowledge http://t.co/yjdgjoScQV htt…
3:14 PM · Mar 06, 2015
78
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
3:58 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
5:54 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
6:00 PM · Mar 06, 2015
918
RT @JMedInternetRes: JMIR: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language: Backg... http…
6:51 PM · Mar 06, 2015
45
RT @jgjeannot: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership and Editors http://t.co/4RDindoqtu #ehealth @retoauer
9:38 PM · Mar 06, 2015
11
RT @WikiResearch: 300 editors/healthcare professionals wrote the world's most viewed source of medical knowledge http://t.co/yjdgjoScQV htt…
9:54 PM · Mar 06, 2015
78
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
1:11 AM · Mar 07, 2015
918
RT @WikiProjectMed: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. h…
3:30 PM · Mar 07, 2015
15
RT @WikiProjectMed: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. h…
3:30 PM · Mar 07, 2015
15
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/XUPvpwduB4
3:47 PM · Mar 07, 2015
10
RT @WikiProjectMed: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. h…
6:25 PM · Mar 07, 2015
15
“@CochraneLingual: #Cochrane references in #Wikipedia medical articles on the rise: http://t.co/Lrkm7VHwqY” I love that this is a metric
6:28 PM · Mar 07, 2015
01
RT @kidney_boy: “@CochraneLingual: #Cochrane references in #Wikipedia medical articles on the rise: http://t.co/Lrkm7VHwqY” I love that thi…
7:12 PM · Mar 07, 2015
01
RT @WikiProjectMed: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. h…
1:41 AM · Mar 08, 2015
15
#Wikipedia is a massively used source of medical information, but this content is maintained by small bunch of people http://t.co/Ep0NESRJp8
8:00 PM · Mar 08, 2015
11
RT @WikiLibrary: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http…
8:01 PM · Mar 08, 2015
16
RT @jfdwolff: #Wikipedia is a massively used source of medical information, but this content is maintained by small bunch of people http://…
8:10 PM · Mar 08, 2015
11
RT @WikiLibrary: Excellent paper by @WikiDocJames and Andrew West on Wikipedia's medical content, quantity, quality, and contributors. http…
12:39 AM · Mar 09, 2015
16
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
4:47 AM · Mar 09, 2015
918
Fascinating analysis of medical information on Wikipedia http://t.co/xmJRDeOTa2
7:26 AM · Mar 09, 2015
12
RT @openaccess_oz: Fascinating analysis of medical information on Wikipedia http://t.co/xmJRDeOTa2
7:33 AM · Mar 09, 2015
12
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language | JMIR http://t.co/WJt6gIJuIE
8:44 AM · Mar 09, 2015
00
RT @openaccess_oz: Fascinating analysis of medical information on Wikipedia http://t.co/lzhpYgobBw
9:48 AM · Mar 09, 2015
10
RT @openaccess_oz: Fascinating analysis of medical information on Wikipedia http://t.co/xmJRDeOTa2
10:15 AM · Mar 09, 2015
12
Health info on @wikipedia in > 255 languages backed by 1m references - doubled since 2009 #GoodNews @WikiProjectMed http://t.co/b0cDLXkf8U
11:50 AM · Mar 09, 2015
00
Investigating medical articles on #Wikipedia: large amount of content, but # of editors decreasing http://t.co/TQv70UK9Oz
2:01 PM · Mar 10, 2015
00
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Wikipedia may be the world's most-used medical resource but "the core group of editors that maintain it is shrinking" ht…
4:05 PM · Mar 10, 2015
918
HOT Top viewed: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Signif... http://t.co/MR1to0QCsI http://t.co/FA36Vj7RMj
6:46 AM · Mar 11, 2015
00
Publication parses #Wikipedia to identify as #1 medical web resource, but 274 core editor group shrinking http://t.co/RAvFeY9HoR #wikidata
12:54 PM · Mar 11, 2015
00
RT @WikiResearch: 300 editors/healthcare professionals wrote the world's most viewed source of medical knowledge http://t.co/yjdgjoScQV htt…
5:56 PM · Mar 12, 2015
78
Everybody uses Wikipedia for #medical information. Is that okay? http://t.co/YSmfXGXuha via @jfdwolff #meded
2:06 PM · Mar 15, 2015
23
RT @Angiologist: Everybody uses Wikipedia for #medical information. Is that okay? http://t.co/YSmfXGXuha via @jfdwolff #meded
2:20 PM · Mar 15, 2015
23
RT @Angiologist: Everybody uses Wikipedia for #medical information. Is that okay? http://t.co/YSmfXGXuha via @jfdwolff #meded
3:20 AM · Mar 16, 2015
23
Interesting read on medical articles on @Wikipedia: http://t.co/iw8r7IFq2G - @frankgaillard @DrAndrewDixon #openaccess
5:07 AM · Mar 16, 2015
34
RT @DrHenryK: Interesting read on medical articles on @Wikipedia: http://t.co/iw8r7IFq2G - @frankgaillard @DrAndrewDixon #openaccess
5:17 AM · Mar 16, 2015
34
RT @DrHenryK: Interesting read on medical articles on @Wikipedia: http://t.co/iw8r7IFq2G - @frankgaillard @DrAndrewDixon #openaccess
5:20 AM · Mar 16, 2015
34
RT @DrHenryK: Interesting read on medical articles on @Wikipedia: http://t.co/iw8r7IFq2G - @frankgaillard @DrAndrewDixon #openaccess
5:36 AM · Mar 16, 2015
34
Hmm. Fewer people are editing @Wikipedia medical articles. That's not good. http://t.co/FYi3uChsVy @JMedInternetRes http://t.co/d5WpYdBxKA
9:50 AM · Mar 16, 2015
45
RT @PaulLikeMe: Hmm. Fewer people are editing @Wikipedia medical articles. That's not good. http://t.co/FYi3uChsVy @JMedInternetRes http://…
9:51 AM · Mar 16, 2015
45
RT @PaulLikeMe: Hmm. Fewer people are editing @Wikipedia medical articles. That's not good. http://t.co/FYi3uChsVy @JMedInternetRes http://…
10:15 AM · Mar 16, 2015
45
RT @PaulLikeMe: Hmm. Fewer people are editing @Wikipedia medical articles. That's not good. http://t.co/FYi3uChsVy @JMedInternetRes http://…
10:42 AM · Mar 16, 2015
45
RT @PaulLikeMe: Hmm. Fewer people are editing @Wikipedia medical articles. That's not good. http://t.co/FYi3uChsVy @JMedInternetRes http://…
11:29 AM · Mar 16, 2015
45
Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:09 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:13 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:13 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:15 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:15 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:16 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
Half of #Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals http://t.co/9w2PjHkogH
5:16 AM · Mar 21, 2015
00
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:20 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/44Xahwm0ly
5:21 AM · Mar 21, 2015
00
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:21 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:21 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
5:27 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
6:06 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
7:00 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
7:38 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
7:42 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
8:06 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
8:26 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
10:01 AM · Mar 21, 2015
1120
Comment on Heilman JM (2015): Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of n http://t.co/AlYfSJydea
1:49 PM · Mar 21, 2015
10
RT @Wikipedia: Half of Wikipedia's top medical editors are health care professionals, 85% have a university education http://t.co/OREJWbC7ri
3:37 AM · Mar 25, 2015
1120
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Signifi- cance of Natural Language http://t.co/4dQCCnYv7F
4:35 PM · Mar 28, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/DyNm9MrpX7
6:55 PM · Apr 08, 2015
12
RT @ChemaCepeda: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/DyNm9MrpX7
7:17 PM · Apr 08, 2015
12
RT @ChemaCepeda: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/DyNm9MrpX7
10:18 AM · Apr 14, 2015
12
Cool! @WikiDocJames' @WikiProjectMed data on @PubMedCommons: most prolific med page editors in 2013 (I'm 156!) http://t.co/thzA6Z0n9X
7:21 PM · May 13, 2015
01
RT @hildabast: Cool! @WikiDocJames' @WikiProjectMed data on @PubMedCommons: most prolific med page editors in 2013 (I'm 156!) http://t.co/t…
7:43 PM · May 13, 2015
01
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language. - PubMed - NCBI http://t.co/qGpRlcrwXx
8:51 AM · Jul 28, 2015
00
Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Significance of Natural Language http://t.co/dCAiIu269Z
8:07 PM · Aug 07, 2015
00
.@OAgeek @oh_henry traffic estimate is across all languages. Source: http://t.co/sxMVOIf2Bd cc @WikiDocJames #wikisci
2:50 PM · Sep 03, 2015
01
RT @ReaderMeter: .@OAgeek @oh_henry traffic estimate is across all languages. Source: http://t.co/sxMVOIf2Bd cc @WikiDocJames #wikisci
2:59 PM · Sep 03, 2015
01
#Medx Ed: @wikipedia & Medicine by @WikiDocJames in @JMedInternetRes http://t.co/tntHITKVcP http://t.co/SmFvftTwYe
10:07 PM · Sep 24, 2015
30
@jessamyn @picklepastures @Wikipedia Here is the data: https://t.co/1UwETWNIrF . Larger article does a good job quantifying other concerns
4:06 PM · Oct 29, 2015
12
RT @sadads: @jessamyn @picklepastures @Wikipedia Here is the data: https://t.co/1UwETWNIrF . Larger article does a good job quantifying oth…
4:07 PM · Oct 29, 2015
12
RT @sadads: @jessamyn @picklepastures @Wikipedia Here is the data: https://t.co/1UwETWNIrF . Larger article does a good job quantifying oth…
4:07 PM · Oct 29, 2015
12
HOT Most purchased: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Si... https://t.co/ulnZ5AxzXa https://t.co/lBpdU5zvUa
9:23 AM · Nov 12, 2015
21
RT @JMedInternetRes: HOT Most purchased: Wikipedia and Medicine: Quantifying Readership, Editors, and the Si... https://t.co/ulnZ5AxzXa htt…
10:09 AM · Nov 12, 2015
21
@LibrarySherpa We are past the "should" questions: 1/2 bill readers each month, biggest medical source of info: https://t.co/S3wOf2URj5
2:21 PM · Sep 09, 2016
00
Try this: https://t.co/DLf9IRtS7p -- full txt free from @nlm_news PMC! https://t.co/dLBmtwIzOx
4:46 PM · Nov 13, 2016
32
RT @NLMdirector: Try this: https://t.co/DLf9IRtS7p -- full txt free from @nlm_news PMC! https://t.co/dLBmtwIzOx
4:47 PM · Nov 13, 2016
32
RT @NLMdirector: Try this: https://t.co/DLf9IRtS7p -- full txt free from @nlm_news PMC! https://t.co/dLBmtwIzOx
4:50 PM · Nov 13, 2016
32
T2: I remember seeing a review of Wikipedia articles that found the medical articles mostly accurate (as opposed to… https://t.co/Z7gi6BKjoL
10:27 PM · Dec 13, 2017
10
#Wikipedia turned 15 years old. Will it survive 15 more? https://t.co/SvVoyL1PBE on JMIR https://t.co/Vh04eEI55t https://t.co/pqB2lPf2sK
3:44 AM · Jan 17, 2016
21