This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (479)

Published on in Vol 13, No 4 (2011): Oct-Dec

Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites

Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites

Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites

Authors of this article:

Daniel Strech1
Article Authors Cited by (51) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Rothenfluh F, Schulz P. Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e212 View
  2. Adjekum A, Blasimme A, Vayena E. Elements of Trust in Digital Health Systems: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(12):e11254 View
  3. Hawkins C, DeLaO A, Hung C. Social Media and the Patient Experience. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2016;13(12):1615 View
  4. Qiu Y, Liu Y, Ren W, Qiu Y, Ren J. Internet-Based and Mobile-Based General Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(9):e266 View
  5. Gao G, McCullough J, Agarwal R, Jha A. A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(1):e38 View
  6. Kool R, Kleefstra S, Borghans I, Atsma F, van de Belt T. Influence of Intensified Supervision by Health Care Inspectorates on Online Patient Ratings of Hospitals: A Multilevel Study of More Than 43,000 Online Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e198 View
  7. Samora J, Lifchez S, Blazar P. Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):104 View
  8. Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek M, Farooq A. Online Reviews of 500 Urologists. Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2269 View
  9. Ferrara S, Hopman W, Leveridge M. Diagnosis, Bedside Manner and Comment Style are Predictive Factors in Online Ratings of Urologists. Urology Practice 2014;1(3):117 View
  10. McLennan S. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816 View
  11. Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F. Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(2):e24 View
  12. Kranzbühler A, Kleijnen M, Verlegh P, Teerling M. When Similarity Beats Expertise—Differential Effects of Patient and Expert Ratings on Physician Choice: Field and Experimental Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(6):e12454 View
  13. Rothenfluh F, Schulz P. Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians’ and Health Care Consumers’ Perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(5):e127 View
  14. Ranney M, Peimer C. Online emergency department ratings, patient satisfaction and the age-old issue of communication. BMJ Quality & Safety 2016;25(1):1 View
  15. Kendall L, Botello T. Internet Sabotage: Negative Online Reviews of Psychiatrists. Psychiatric Annals 2016;46(12):715 View
  16. Chretien K, Kind T. Social Media and Clinical Care. Circulation 2013;127(13):1413 View
  17. Kleefstra S, Zandbelt L, Borghans I, de Haes H, Kool R. Investigating the Potential Contribution of Patient Rating Sites to Hospital Supervision: Exploratory Results From an Interview Study in the Netherlands. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e201 View
  18. McLennan S, Strech D, Meyer A, Kahrass H. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e387 View
  19. Hong Y, Liang C, Radcliff T, Wigfall L, Street R. What Do Patients Say About Doctors Online? A Systematic Review of Studies on Patient Online Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e12521 View
  20. Verhoef L, Van de Belt T, Engelen L, Schoonhoven L, Kool R. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56 View
  21. Okike K, Uhr N, Shin S, Xie K, Kim C, Funahashi T, Kanter M. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2019;34(11):2575 View
  22. Vu A, Espinoza G, Perry J, Chundury R. Online Ratings of ASOPRS Surgeons: What Do Your Patients Really Think of You?. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2017;33(6):466 View
  23. Merrell J, Levy B, Johnson D. Patient Assessments and Online Ratings of Quality Care: A “Wake-Up Call” for Providers. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;108(11):1676 View
  24. Frost C, Mesfin A. Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons: An Emerging Trend. Orthopedics 2015;38(4) View
  25. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e276 View
  26. Rothenfluh F, Germeni E, Schulz P. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(6):e129 View
  27. McLennan S, Strech D, Kahrass H. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1) View
  28. Schulz P, Rothenfluh F. Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e14134 View
  29. Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e275 View
  30. Bernstein D, Mesfin A. Physician-Review Websites in Orthopaedic Surgery. JBJS Reviews 2020;8(3):e0158 View
  31. Greaves F, Millett C, Nuki P. England’s Experience Incorporating “Anecdotal” Reports From Consumers into Their National Reporting System. Medical Care Research and Review 2014;71(5_suppl):65S View
  32. Velasco B, Chien B, Kwon J, Miller C. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Foot & Ankle Specialist 2020;13(1):43 View
  33. Ranney M, Peimer C. Commentary on “Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications”. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):111 View
  34. McLennan S, Strech D, Reimann S. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e299 View
  35. Devgan L, Klein E, Fox S, Ozturk T. Bifurcation of Patient Reviews: An Analysis of Trends in Online Ratings. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open 2020;8(4):e2781 View
  36. Trehan S, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings: Why They Matter and What They Mean. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(2):316 View
  37. McLennan S. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e14336 View
  38. Mulgund P, Sharman R, Anand P, Shekhar S, Karadi P. Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e15916 View
  39. Kim C, Chisholm G, Bevolo A, Shelton B, Kian L, Lewis C, Garcia E, Weber R, Frumovitz M. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites. JCO Oncology Practice 2021;17(8):e1181 View
  40. Gross C, Scott D, Samora J, Khan M, Kang D, Frank R. Physician-Rating Websites and Social Media Usage: A Global Survey of Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2022;104(2):e5 View
  41. Kasaven L, Saso S, Ben Nagi J, Joash K, Yazbek J, Richard Smith J, Bourne T, Jones B. TOGadvisor: the role of online feedback in obstetrics and gynaecology. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2022;24(1):7 View
  42. Richman E, Ogbaudu E, Pollock J, Brinkman J, Moore M, Arthur J, Karlen J. Characterizing Negative Online Reviews of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 2022;42(5):e533 View
  43. Qubain L, Richman E, Eaton V, Brinkman J, Goulding K, Agarwal M. Analysis of Negative Reviews of Orthopedic Oncology Surgeons: An Investigation of Reviews from Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google. Sarcoma 2022;2022:1 View
  44. Spiro G, Sommerfeld C, Fung K, Quimby A, Pulkki K, Fortin M, Nguyen L. Poor Online Patient Ratings of Otolaryngologists in the United States: What are Patients Saying?. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal 2023:014556132211501 View
  45. Patel M, Williams M, Thompson M, Desai P. What Affects an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Online Rating? A Large-Scale, Retrospective Analysis. JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews 2022;6(3) View
  46. Shah A, Muhammad W, Lee K, Naqvi R. Examining Different Factors in Web-Based Patients’ Decision-Making Process: Systematic Review on Digital Platforms for Clinical Decision Support System. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11226 View
  47. Gibstein A, Yang A, Thorne C, Bradley J, Tanna N. Online Reviews in a Major City. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2021;87(1s):S31 View
  48. White C, Tang J, Patel A, Bernstein J, Gross B, Arvind V, Kim J, Cho S, Cagle P. Understanding a New Age of Physician Ratings via Sentiment Analysis: How are Patients Reviewing Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Online?. Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation 2023;4(1) View
  49. Bondok M, Nguyen A, Tanya S, Youn G, Lando L, Wu A. Gender and personalized profile information influence online ratings of Canadian academic ophthalmologists. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Chiu M, Cheng W. HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations: Information Systems. View
  2. Fox D. Transparency in Health and Health Care in the United States. View