The Role of User Input in Shaping Online Information From the National Cancer Institute

Journals

1. Mitschke D. Using Net Conferencing to Facilitate Cancer Care and Education. Journal of Technology in Human Services 2008;26(1):57 View
2. Pauporté I, Manach E, Bachouche N, Duperrey M, Hommais A. Fréquentation du registre français des essais cliniques en cancérologie et information recherchée par les patients et proches. Oncologie 2011;13(6):305 View
3. Whitten P, Kreps G, Eastin M. Creating a Framework for Online Cancer Services Research to Facilitate Timely and Interdisciplinary Applications. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2005;7(3):e34 View
4. Atkinson N, Saperstein S, Massett H, Leonard C, Grama L, Manrow R. Using the Internet to search for cancer clinical trials: A comparative audit of clinical trial search tools. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2008;29(4):555 View
5. Simon C, Schramm S, Hillis S. Patient internet use surrounding cancer clinical trials: Clinician perceptions and responses. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2010;31(3):229 View
6. Neuhauser L, Kreps G. Online cancer communication: Meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Patient Education and Counseling 2008;71(3):365 View
7. Khajouei R, Ameri A, Jahani Y. Evaluating the agreement of users with usability problems identified by heuristic evaluation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2018;117:13 View
8. Peute L, Knijnenburg S, Kremer L, Jaspers M. A Concise and Practical Framework for the Development and Usability Evaluation of Patient Information Websites. Applied Clinical Informatics 2015;06(02):383 View
9. Yang Z, McComas K, Gay G, Leonard J, Dannenberg A, Dillon H. Information Seeking Related to Clinical Trial Enrollment. Communication Research 2011;38(6):856 View
10. Dear R, Barratt A, Crossing S, Butow P, Hanson S, Tattersall M. Consumer input into research: the Australian Cancer Trials website. Health Research Policy and Systems 2011;9(1) View
11. Ogino D, Takahashi K, Sato H. Characteristics of clinical trial websites: information distribution between ClinicalTrials.gov and 13 primary registries in the WHO registry network. Trials 2014;15(1) View
12. Wood F, Siegel E, Feldman S, Love C, Rodrigues D, Malamud M, Lagana M, Crafts J. Web Evaluation at the US National Institutes of Health: Use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index Online Customer Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008;10(1):e4 View
13. Keselman A, Logan R, Smith C, Leroy G, Zeng-Treitler Q. Developing Informatics Tools and Strategies for Consumer-centered Health Communication. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2008;15(4):473 View
14. Lee K, Choi J, Marakas G, Singh S. Two distinct routes for inducing emotions in HCI design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2019;124:67 View
15. Jaspers M. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009;78(5):340 View
16. Barrington M, Fisher K, Harris-Roxas B, Spooner C, Trollor J, Weise J. Accessibility of Australian government online cancer screening information for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Public Health 2025 View
17. Willerton R. Writing Toward Readers' Better Health: A Case Study Examining the Development of Online Health Information. Technical Communication Quarterly 2008;17(3):311 View

Books/Policy Documents

1. Robinson L. Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare. View
2. Zarin D, Williams R, Tse T, Ide N. Principles and Practice of Clinical Research. View
3. Tse T, Zarin D, Williams R, Ide N. Principles and Practice of Clinical Research. View

Conference Proceedings

1. van den Haak M, van Hooijdonk C. 2010 IEEE International Professional Comunication Conference. Evaluating consumer health information websites: The importance of collecting observational, user-driven data View