This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Tutorial (64)

Published on in Vol 7, No 1 (2005):

The Internet and Clinical Trials: Background, Online Resources, Examples and Issues

The Internet and Clinical Trials: Background, Online Resources, Examples and Issues

The Internet and Clinical Trials: Background, Online Resources, Examples and Issues

Authors of this article:

James Paul ;   Rachael Seib ;   Todd Prescott
Article Authors Cited by (60) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Lagares A, Fernández-Alén J, de Toledo P, Ibáñez J, Arikan F, Sarabia R, Ballenilla F, Gabarros A, Horcajadas A, Rodríguez-Boto G, de la Lama A, Maillo A, Delgado P, Llacer J, Domínguez J, Arrese I. Base de datos multicéntrica de hemorragia subaracnoidea espontánea del Grupo de Trabajo de Patología Vascular de la Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía: presentación, criterios de inclusión y desarrollo de una base de datos en internet. Neurocirugía 2008;19(5):405 View
  2. Pavlovic I, Miklavcic D. Web-Based Electronic Data Collection System to Support Electrochemotherapy Clinical Trial. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2007;11(2):222 View
  3. Murray E, Khadjesari Z, White I, Kalaitzaki E, Godfrey C, McCambridge J, Thompson S, Wallace P. Methodological Challenges in Online Trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2009;11(1):e9 View
  4. Sekine I, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Saijo N, Tamura T. Problems with Registration-Directed Clinical Trials for Lung Cancer in Japan. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 2007;213(1):17 View
  5. Price A, Vasanthan L, Clarke M, Liew S, Brice A, Burls A. SMOOTH: Self-Management of Open Online Trials in Health analysis found improvements were needed for reporting methods of internet-based trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;105:27 View
  6. Kunithala V, Kabeer A, Vemula S. Advance Oracle Clinical Software tool used in clinical research from patient data collection to data base lock. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs 2013;30(1-2):1 View
  7. Cioffi I, Martina R, Michelotti A, Chiodini P, Tagliaferri R, Farella M. Web-based randomised controlled trials in orthodontics. Evidence-Based Dentistry 2008;9(4):118 View
  8. Pavlović I, Kern T, Miklavčič D. Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection process in clinical trials: Costs simulation study. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2009;30(4):300 View
  9. Krischer J, Cronholm P, Burroughs C, McAlear C, Borchin R, Easley E, Davis T, Kullman J, Carette S, Khalidi N, Koening C, Langford C, Monach P, Moreland L, Pagnoux C, Specks U, Sreih A, Ytterberg S, Merkel P. Experience With Direct-to-Patient Recruitment for Enrollment Into a Clinical Trial in a Rare Disease: A Web-Based Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(2):e50 View
  10. Applequist J, Burroughs C, Ramirez A, Merkel P, Rothenberg M, Trapnell B, Desnick R, Sahin M, Krischer J. A novel approach to conducting clinical trials in the community setting: utilizing patient-driven platforms and social media to drive web-based patient recruitment. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2020;20(1) View
  11. Sekine I, Takada M, Nokihara H, Yamamoto S, Tamura T. Knowledge of Efficacy of Treatments in Lung Cancer Is Not Enough, Their Clinical Effectiveness Should Also Be Known. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2006;1(5):398 View
  12. Simon C, Hegedus S. Exploring websites on cancer clinical trials: An empirical review. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2005;26(5):530 View
  13. Rincón-Valenzuela D. “Jamás nos hemos resignado a ser simples artesanos de la Anestesia”: pasado, presente y futuro de la Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología 2012;40(1):6 View
  14. Rosa C, Campbell A, Miele G, Brunner M, Winstanley E. Using e-technologies in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2015;45:41 View
  15. Grill J, Hoang D, Gillen D, Cox C, Gombosev A, Klein K, O’Leary S, Witbracht M, Pierce A, Swerdlow R. Constructing a Local Potential Participant Registry to Improve Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Research Recruitment. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2018;63(3):1055 View
  16. Côté J, Cossette S, Ramirez-Garcia P, De Pokomandy A, Worthington C, Gagnon M, Auger P, Boudreau F, Miranda J, Guéhéneuc Y, Tremblay C. Evaluation of a Web-based tailored intervention (TAVIE en santé) to support people living with HIV in the adoption of health promoting behaviours: an online randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health 2015;15(1) View
  17. Kay H, Wu H, Lee S, Kim S. Applications of Genetically Modified Tools to Safety Assessment in Drug Development. Toxicological Research 2010;26(1):1 View
  18. Le Jeannic A, Quelen C, Alberti C, Durand-Zaleski I. Comparison of two data collection processes in clinical studies: electronic and paper case report forms. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014;14(1) View
  19. Côté J, Godin G, Guéhéneuc Y, Rouleau G, Ramirez-Garcìa P, Otis J, Tremblay C, Fadel G. Evaluation of a real-time virtual intervention to empower persons living with HIV to use therapy self-management: study protocol for an online randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012;13(1) View
  20. Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I, Morley D, Torgerson C. An e-learning package to support interprofessional education: a pilot feasibility and efficacy randomized controlled trial in a medical education setting. Effective Education 2012;4(2):111 View
  21. El Emam K, Jonker E, Sampson M, Krleža-Jerić K, Neisa A. The Use of Electronic Data Capture Tools in Clinical Trials: Web-Survey of 259 Canadian Trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2009;11(1):e8 View
  22. Sekine I, Takada M, Nokihara H, Yamamoto S, Tamura T. Knowledge of Efficacy of Treatments in Lung Cancer Is Not Enough, Their Clinical Effectiveness Should Also Be Known. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2006;1(5):398 View
  23. Koneska E, Appelbe D, Williamson P, Dodd S. Usage Metrics of Web-Based Interventions Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e15474 View
  24. Levin E, Levin A. Evaluation of Spoken Dialogue Technology for Real-Time Health Data Collection. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2006;8(4):e30 View
  25. Rincón-Valenzuela D. “We have never resigned ourselves to be mere craftsmen of anesthesia”: past, present and future of the Colombian Journal of Anesthesia. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology 2012;40(1):6 View
  26. Valiquette L, Low D, Chow R, McGeer A. A survey of physician's attitudes regarding management of severe group A streptococcal infections. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 2006;38(11-12):977 View
  27. Gladman M, Cudkowicz M, Zinman L. Enhancing clinical trials in neurodegenerative disorders. Current Opinion in Neurology 2012;25(6):735 View
  28. Fraccaro P, Dentone C, Fenoglio D, Giacomini M. Multicentre clinical trials’ data management: a hybrid solution to exploit the strengths of electronic data capture and electronic health records systems. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2013;38(4):313 View
  29. Wallace P, Murray E, McCambridge J, Khadjesari Z, White I, Thompson S, Kalaitzaki E, Godfrey C, Linke S, Myer L. On-line Randomized Controlled Trial of an Internet Based Psychologically Enhanced Intervention for People with Hazardous Alcohol Consumption. PLoS ONE 2011;6(3):e14740 View
  30. Gazali , Kaur S, Singh I. Artificial intelligence based clinical data management systems: A review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2017;9:219 View
  31. Kuchinke W, Ohmann C, Yang Q, Salas N, Lauritsen J, Gueyffier F, Leizorovicz A, Schade-Brittinger C, Wittenberg M, Voko Z, Gaynor S, Cooney M, Doran P, Maggioni A, Lorimer A, Torres F, McPherson G, Charwill J, Hellström M, Lejeune S. Heterogeneity prevails: the state of clinical trial data management in Europe - results of a survey of ECRIN centres. Trials 2010;11(1) View
  32. Brice A, Price A, Burls A. Creating a database of internet-based clinical trials to support a public-led research programme: A descriptive analysis. DIGITAL HEALTH 2015;1 View
  33. Richesson R, Lee H, Cuthbertson D, Lloyd J, Young K, Krischer J. An automated communication system in a contact registry for persons with rare diseases: Scalable tools for identifying and recruiting clinical research participants. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2009;30(1):55 View
  34. Staziaki P, Kim P, Vadvala H, Ghoshhajra B. Medical Registry Data Collection Efficiency: A Crossover Study Comparing Web-Based Electronic Data Capture and a Standard Spreadsheet. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(6):e141 View
  35. Chauvie S, Biggi A, Stancu A, Cerello P, Cavallo A, Fallanca F, Ficola U, Gregianin M, Guerra U, Chiaravalloti A, Schillaci O, Gallamini A. WIDEN: A tool for medical image management in multicenter clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2014;11(3):355 View
  36. Frost J, Okun S, Vaughan T, Heywood J, Wicks P. Patient-reported Outcomes as a Source of Evidence in Off-Label Prescribing: Analysis of Data From PatientsLikeMe. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2011;13(1):e6 View
  37. Mathieu E, McGeechan K, Barratt A, Herbert R. Internet-based randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013;20(3):568 View
  38. Juluru K, Eng J. Use of Spreadsheets for Research Data Collection and Preparation:. Academic Radiology 2015;22(12):1592 View
  39. Rincón-Valenzuela D. “We have never resigned ourselves to be mere craftsmen of anesthesia”: past, present and future of the Colombian Journal of Anesthesia. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology 2012;40(1):6 View
  40. Carter W, Fergus K, Ahmad S, McLeod D, Stephen J. Defining the Role of the Online Therapeutic Facilitator: Principles and Guidelines Developed for Couplelinks, an Online Support Program for Couples Affected by Breast Cancer. JMIR Cancer 2015;1(1):e4 View
  41. Estellat C, Tubach F, Costa Y, Hoffmann I, Mantz J, Ravaud P. Data capture by digital pen in clinical trials: A qualitative and quantitative study. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2008;29(3):314 View
  42. Eisenstein E, Zozus M, Sanns W. Beyond EDC. Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management 2021;1(1) View
  43. Reichold M, Heß M, Kolominsky-Rabas P, Gräßel E, Prokosch H. Usability Evaluation of an Offline Electronic Data Capture App in a Prospective Multicenter Dementia Registry (digiDEM Bayern): Mixed Method Study. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(11):e31649 View
  44. Li X, Ma Q, Yin J, Zheng Y, Chen R, Chen Y, Li T, Wang Y, Yang K, Zhang H, Tang Y, Chen Y, Dong H, Gu Q, Guo D, Hu X, Xie L, Li B, Li Y, Lin T, Liu F, Liu Z, Lyu L, Mei Q, Shao J, Xin H, Yang F, Yang H, Yang W, Yao X, Yu C, Zhan S, Zhang G, Wang M, Zhu Z, Zhou B, Gu J, Xian M, Lyu Y, Li Z, Zheng H, Cui C, Deng S, Huang C, Li L, Liu P, Men P, Shao C, Wang S, Ma X, Wang Q, Zhai S. A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Emergency Management of Anaphylaxis (2020). Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022;13 View
  45. Kim H, Sohn H. The Effect of Regulation on Recruitment Advertising for Clinical Trial Subjects in Korea. Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2022;32(3):166 View
  46. Santa-Ana-Tellez Y, Lagerwaard B, de Jong A, Gardarsdottir H, Grobbee D, Hawkins K, Heath M, Zuidgeest M. Decentralised, patient-centric, site-less, virtual, and digital clinical trials? From confusion to consensus. Drug Discovery Today 2023;28(4):103520 View
  47. Martínez‐Vázquez S, Martínez‐Galiano J, Peinado‐Molina R, Hernández‐Martínez A. Magnitude of general anxiety disorder among nursing students and its associated factors. Health Science Reports 2023;6(7) View
  48. Shen R, Mulder H, Wruck L, Weissler E, Robertson H, Sharlow A, Kripalani S, Muñoz D, Effron M, Gupta K, Girotra S, Whittle J, Benziger C, VanWormer J, Polonsky T, Rothman R, Harrington R, Hernandez A, Jones W. Internet Versus Noninternet Participation in a Decentralized Clinical Trial: Lessons From the ADAPTABLE Study. Journal of the American Heart Association 2023;12(13) View
  49. Larionow P, Preece D. The Perth Empathy Scale: Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version and Its Mental Health Correlates. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 2023;13(11):2615 View
  50. Ooghe A, Liu X, Robbins S, Eyles J, Deveza L, Branders S, Clermont F, Pereira A, Hunter D. Report of Similar Placebo Response in One Internet versus Onsite Randomised Controlled Trials From the Literature.. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open 2024:100474 View
  51. Cronholm P, Applequist J, Krischer J, Fontenot E, Davis T, Burroughs C, McAlear C, Borchin R, Kullman J, Carette S, Khalidi N, Koening C, Langford C, Monach P, Moreland L, Pagnoux C, Specks U, Sreih A, Ytterberg S, Merkel P, Martin J, Madden L, Rice B, Thomas J, Farquharson J, Jagadeesh S, Messier S, Robins D, Finco M, Godina J, Gonzalez J, Nielsen J, Crook S, Gartner K, Kisela E, Strozniak L, Hope L, McBride D, Beinhorn C, Kim Y, Mieras K. A study of implementation factors for a novel approach to clinical trials: constructs for consideration in the coordination of direct-to-patient online-based medical research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2024;24(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Alpuim A, Esteves M, Pereira S, Santos M. Health Care Delivery and Clinical Science. View
  2. Alpuim A, Esteves M, Pereira S, Santos M. Applying Business Intelligence to Clinical and Healthcare Organizations. View
  3. Bryan H. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. View
  4. Bryan H. Wiley Encyclopedia of Clinical Trials. View
  5. Santoro E, Tinazzi A. Pharmaceutical Sciences Encyclopedia. View
  6. Hawkins B. Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials. View
  7. Hawkins B. Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials. View
  8. Jagdale S, Hable A. Computer Aided Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery. View