Published on in Vol 5, No 4 (2003):

Conceptual Framework for a New Tool for Evaluating the Quality of Diabetes Consumer-Information Web Sites

Conceptual Framework for a New Tool for Evaluating the Quality of Diabetes Consumer-Information Web Sites

Conceptual Framework for a New Tool for Evaluating the Quality of Diabetes Consumer-Information Web Sites

Authors of this article:

Joshua J Seidman ;   Donald Steinwachs ;   Haya R Rubin

Journals

  1. Shinde M, Joshi A, Arutagi V, Singh D, Khare V, Pandey P. Visual dynamic e-module as a tool to fulfill informational needs and care continuum for diabetic patients. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 2015;4(3):310 View
  2. Seidman J, Steinwachs D, Rubin H. Design and Testing of a Tool for Evaluating the Quality of Diabetes Consumer-Information Web Sites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003;5(4):e30 View
  3. Zhang J, Zhao Y. A user term visualization analysis based on a social question and answer log. Information Processing & Management 2013;49(5):1019 View
  4. Tahir M, Usman M, Muhammad F, Rehman S, Khan I, Idrees M, Irfan M, Glowacz A. Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Online Health Information on High Blood Pressure Using DISCERN and Flesch-Kincaid Tools. Applied Sciences 2020;10(9):3214 View
  5. Bedell S, Agrawal A, Petersen L. A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2004;73(9-10):687 View
  6. Van Esch S, Cornel M, Snoek F. Type 2 diabetes and inheritance: what information do diabetes organizations provide on the Internet?. Diabetic Medicine 2006;23(11):1233 View
  7. Robertson-Lang L, Major S, Hemming H. An Exploration of Search Patterns and Credibility Issues among Older Adults Seeking Online Health Information. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement 2011;30(4):631 View
  8. Tao D, LeRouge C, Smith K, De Leo G. Defining Information Quality Into Health Websites: A Conceptual Framework of Health Website Information Quality for Educated Young Adults. JMIR Human Factors 2017;4(4):e25 View
  9. Williams N, Mughal S, Blair M. ‘Is my child developing normally?’: a critical review of web‐based resources for parents. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2008;50(12):893 View
  10. Longo D, Ge B, Radina M, Greiner A, Williams C, Longo G, Mouzon D, Natale-Pereira A, Salas-Lopez D. Understanding breast-cancer patients' perceptions: Health information-seeking behaviour and passive information receipt. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 2009;2(2):184 View
  11. Hanif F, Read J, Goodacre J, Chaudhry A, Gibbs P. The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the Internet for health information. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2009;34(4):231 View
  12. Rasmussen B, Dunning P, O'Connell B. Young women with diabetes: using Internet communication to create stability during life transitions. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007;16(3a):17 View
  13. Alhajj M, Mashyakhy M, Ariffin Z, Ab-Ghani Z, Johari Y, Salim N. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2020;21(9):956 View