Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Authors’ Reply: Reassessing AI in Medicine: Exploring the Capabilities of AI in Academic Abstract Synthesis

Authors’ Reply: Reassessing AI in Medicine: Exploring the Capabilities of AI in Academic Abstract Synthesis

Reference 1: Reassessing AI in medicine: exploring the capabilities of AI in academic abstract synthesisabstractAuthors’ Reply: Reassessing AI in Medicine: Exploring the Capabilities of AI in Academic Abstract Synthesis

Tien-Wei Hsu, Chih-Sung Liang

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e65123

Reassessing AI in Medicine: Exploring the Capabilities of AI in Academic Abstract Synthesis

Reassessing AI in Medicine: Exploring the Capabilities of AI in Academic Abstract Synthesis

Does the realization that an abstract is AI generated influence the reviewers’ judgment of its content? In scientific research, the primary goal of writing a paper is to present research results to the readers. If AI assistance in refining an article does not alter the accuracy of the research and aids in clearer communication of research content, such practice should be deemed acceptable.

Zijian Wang, Chunyang Zhou

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55920

Video Abstracts in Research

Video Abstracts in Research

A video abstract is a brief video that provides several key messages about a research article. Video abstracts catalyze public engagement, increase the number of manuscript views, and may increase manuscript citations [1,2]. A growing open science movement provides a strong rationale for developing a video abstract as part of a health research manuscript.

Sophie Nachman, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Joseph D Tucker

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e64221

Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis

Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis

Furthermore, the differences between Chat GPT and Bard in abstract generation have not yet been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of abstracts generated by Chat GPT and Bard compared with human-written abstracts in the field of spinal surgery.

Hong Jin Kim, Jae Hyuk Yang, Dong-Gune Chang, Lawrence G Lenke, Javier Pizones, René Castelein, Kota Watanabe, Per D Trobisch, Gregory M Mundis Jr, Seung Woo Suh, Se-Il Suk

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e52001

Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study

Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study

In this study, we provided the “title” and “journal style” to Chat GPT and prompted it to generate a scientific abstract [3]. We found that the abstracts generated by Chat GPT exhibited a high level of fluency and successfully deceived human reviewers. However, these abstracts contained fabricated data and high percentages of plagiarism and AI-generated content.

Shu-Li Cheng, Shih-Jen Tsai, Ya-Mei Bai, Chih-Hung Ko, Chih-Wei Hsu, Fu-Chi Yang, Chia-Kuang Tsai, Yu-Kang Tu, Szu-Nian Yang, Ping-Tao Tseng, Tien-Wei Hsu, Chih-Sung Liang, Kuan-Pin Su

J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e51229