Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Robots in Healthcare (249) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (1266) Viewpoints on and Experiences with Digital Technologies in Health (269) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (1758) Dementia and Cognitive Decline (860) Robotics in Rehabilitation (100) Intellectual Disabilities (49)

Published on in Vol 27 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/74168, first published .
Cute white robot toy with a friendly face on its screen and a pink scarf.

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences Regarding Facilitators of and Barriers to Sustained Use of Social Robot Ivy for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Qualitative Interview Study

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences Regarding Facilitators of and Barriers to Sustained Use of Social Robot Ivy for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Qualitative Interview Study

Authors of this article:

Mark Steins1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Claire Huijnen3 Author Orcid Image ;   Gaby Odekerken-Schröder1 Author Orcid Image ;   Dominik Mahr1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kars Mennens1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ramon Daniels3 Author Orcid Image ;   Frank Mathmann2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations Metrics Author Video

Journals

  1. Balalic S, Sanderman R, Degens N, Tuinman M, Hagedoorn M, Jan Y. The expected benefits of using social robots when working with institutionalised older adults: A qualitative study among healthcare professionals. PLOS One 2026;21(5):e0348438 View
  2. Barbosa P, Ferreira F, Teixeira J, Mendes G. Uncovering the social impact of service robots in transformative services: conceptual typology and future research. Journal of Social Impact in Business Research 2026;2(2):61 View
  3. Harmsen M, Adam E, Ricke E, Smaling H. User requirements for an emotion-intelligent autonomous care robot in long-term care. European Geriatric Medicine 2026 View