This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (288) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832) Patient Reported Measures and Outcomes in Participatory Medicine (18) Innovations and Technology in Cancer Care (423) Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science (398)

Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/55841, first published .
Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Medical Oncology Setting (the iPROMOS Study): Type II Hybrid Implementation Study

Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Medical Oncology Setting (the iPROMOS Study): Type II Hybrid Implementation Study

Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Medical Oncology Setting (the iPROMOS Study): Type II Hybrid Implementation Study

Authors of this article:

Natasha Anne Roberts1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Anita Pelecanos3 Author Orcid Image ;   Kimberly Alexander4 Author Orcid Image ;   David Wyld5, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Monika Janda1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

Natasha Anne Roberts   1, 2 , BN, PhD ;   Anita Pelecanos   3 , BSc, BHSc ;   Kimberly Alexander   4 , BHlthSc, BNurs, PhD ;   David Wyld   5, 6 , MBBS ;   Monika Janda   1 , PhD

1 The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Australia

2 Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service Metro North Health and University of Queensland, Herston, Australia

3 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia

4 School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia

5 Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia

6 The University of Queensland Clinical School, St Lucia, Australia

Corresponding Author: