Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/53873, first published .
Research Trends on Metabolic Syndrome in Digital Health Care Using Topic Modeling: Systematic Search of Abstracts

Research Trends on Metabolic Syndrome in Digital Health Care Using Topic Modeling: Systematic Search of Abstracts

Research Trends on Metabolic Syndrome in Digital Health Care Using Topic Modeling: Systematic Search of Abstracts

Authors of this article:

Kiseong Lee1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yoongi Chung2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ji-Su Kim2 Author Orcid Image

Original Paper

1Humanities Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

2Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Ji-Su Kim, PhD

Department of Nursing

Chung-Ang University

84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Seoul, 06974

Republic of Korea

Phone: 82 028205991

Email: jisu80@cau.ac.kr


Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a prevalent health condition that affects 20%-40% of the global population. Lifestyle modification is essential for the prevention and management of MetS. Digital health care, which incorporates technologies like wearable devices, mobile apps, and telemedicine, is increasingly becoming integral to health care systems. By analyzing existing research trends in the application of digital health care for MetS management, this study identifies gaps in current knowledge and suggests avenues for future research.

Objective: This study aimed to identify core keywords, topics, and research trends concerning the use of digital health care in the management of MetS.

Methods: A systematic search of abstracts from peer-reviewed papers was conducted across 6 academic databases. Following eligibility screening, 162 abstracts were selected for further analysis. The methodological approach included text preprocessing, text network analysis, and topic modeling using the BERTopic algorithm.

Results: Analysis of the 162 selected abstracts yielded a keyword network comprising 1047 nodes and 34,377 edges. The top 5 core keywords were identified as “MetS,” “use,” “patient,” “health,” and “intervention.” We identified 12 unique topics, with topic 1 focusing on the use of telehealth for self-management of diabetes. The diversity of the 12 topics reflected various aspects of digital health care, including telehealth for diabetes management, electronic health records for MetS complications, and wearable devices for monitoring metabolic status. Research trends showed an expanding field of precision medicine driven by the demand for tailored interventions and the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions: By analyzing past research trends and extracting data from scholarly databases, this study has provided valuable insights that can guide future investigations in the field of digital health care and MetS management.

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e53873

doi:10.2196/53873

Keywords



Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is reported to have a global prevalence ranging between 20% and 40% [1]. Characterized as a cluster of major interrelated risk factors for cardiovascular disease, MetS significantly exacerbates health outcomes by more than doubling the risk of cardiovascular diseases [2]. A MetS diagnosis is established when 3 or more of the following 5 risk factors are present: waist circumference indicative of obesity, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia [3]. As MetS is closely linked to lifestyle factors such as poor diet and insufficient physical activity (PA) [4], it can be prevented by targeted lifestyle modifications [5]. Given the substantial individual, societal, and economic burdens MetS imposes, proactive prevention and ongoing management are imperative.

Digital health care refers to the use of information and communication technology to monitor and manage health and well-being [6]. Advances in the information and communication technology sector have facilitated health care delivery through mobile apps, wearable devices, artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and telemedicine [7]. Digital health care has already been extensively applied across various health care domains. For instance, smart bands, a category of wearable devices, can quantify PA metrics such as step count, walking distance, and walking intensity [8]. Studies indicate that the adoption of these wearable devices can enhance PA levels among individuals with chronic conditions [9]. Moreover, health-related mobile apps have the potential to instigate behavioral changes in users by providing educational content, personalized health counseling, and diet and exercise monitoring [10]. This approach takes genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors into account to develop personalized treatment plans, offering potential improvements in the management of MetS through more targeted interventions [11]. In other words, it enables the application of precision medicine, a health care approach that tailors medical treatment to each patient’s individual characteristics [11]. Given that digital health care is already widely used in health care settings, evidence from multiple studies [1,5,7-10] supports its applicability in managing MetS-associated risk factors, including obesity and diabetes.

To mitigate the impact of MetS and enhance long-term quality of life through ongoing management, a deep understanding of existing research trends is crucial. Previous studies on MetS within the realm of digital health care have used systematic reviews, meta-analyses [9,12-14], and scoping reviews [15]. However, these approaches have limitations, particularly in the depth to which they explore subjects, key concepts, and topics. Given the rapid advancements in digital health care research, it is imperative that researchers stay informed about the evolving knowledge structure, including emerging topics and shifting trends in MetS and digital health care research. This understanding is essential for maintaining the relevance and efficacy of ongoing and future studies in this dynamic field.

This study used text network analysis to analyze the frequency and patterns of the co-occurrence of words in textual data such as article abstracts [16,17]. This method offers the benefit of allowing a visual and intuitive understanding of the relationships between significant keywords, serving as a valuable network statistical indicator [16,17]. Furthermore, topic modeling serves as a statistical inference model that uses text mining to objectively and clearly evaluate research topics [18]. We used text mining analysis to examine trends in MetS-related digital health care research to understand the existing knowledge structure and inform the direction of future investigations. Accordingly, this study aimed to clarify the relationships between keywords by analyzing previous research on MetS within the domain of digital health care through text network analysis and to investigate research topics related to MetS within the digital health care sector.

The objective of this study was to construct a network that consolidates prior research on MetS within the field of digital health care. The study aimed to create an informed body of literature by comparing and analyzing keywords and research topics. The study had 3 primary goals: first, to identify the terms associated with MetS research in digital health care; second, to establish a text network comprising core keywords from existing literature on MetS and digital health care; and third, to identify trends in MetS research within the digital health care context through topic modeling.


Study Design

This is a descriptive study in which we used topic modeling techniques to classify keywords into topics within the realm of digital health care for MetS management and tracked topic-specific trends over time.

Search Strategy and Data Collection

We conducted a comprehensive search of 6 electronic academic databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. The search strategy involved using combinations of various terms to filter publication titles, abstracts, and keywords. The terms used included: (Digital health OR mobile health OR ehealth OR e-health OR mhealth OR telehealth OR electronic health OR web-based OR apps OR wearables OR devices) AND (metabolic syndrome OR Metabolic Syndromes OR syndrome, metabolic OR syndromes, metabolic OR MetS OR syndrome X) (Multimedia Appendix 1).

The search and selection processes were performed in May 2023. We included all abstracts from articles published before April 20, 2023. There were no restrictions on the start date of the literature to ensure a comprehensive analysis of studies over time. Studies were excluded if they involved participants with conditions other than MetS or conditions related to subdiagnosis criteria such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Additionally, studies without an abstract or with a non-English abstract were excluded.

From the initial 33,078 studies identified, 17,675 duplicate entries were removed. The remaining 15,403 studies were screened based on their title and abstract. Studies were further excluded based on the following criteria: 12,746 studies lacked keywords related to both MetS and digital health care, 2114 studies did not focus on patients, 380 studies lacked an abstract, and one was a duplicate. Subsequently, 2 researchers independently screened the identified articles’ titles and abstracts. In cases of disagreement, consensus was reached through discussion and further review against the selection criteria. Ultimately, a total of 162 articles were included for data analysis (Figure 1). Data, including serial numbers, authors, titles, author keywords, and abstracts, were organized into a matrix using Microsoft Excel.

Figure 1. Flowchart of the study selection process.

Analysis

We performed text preprocessing, topic modeling, and text network analysis on the collected abstracts. Custom code written in Python was used to execute these tasks. The code can be reviewed on GitHub [19].

Text Preprocessing

In the text preprocessing stage, we initiated the process by removing internet address formats, HTML tags, and special characters from the abstracts. Additionally, any text that was not in English was discarded. We then harmonized expressions that had similar or identical meanings; for instance, the terms “mobile health,” “mhealth,” and “m-health” were consolidated as “m-health.” We also compiled a list of specialized terms to avoid issues with word separation because of spacing; notably, the term “randomized controlled trial” was transformed into “randomized_controlled_trial.” To refine the focus of our analysis, we carefully curated a list of stop words by iteratively reviewing the text analysis results. This process allowed us to differentiate between common terms and significant terms, thus ensuring that essential information was retained. Consequently, we excluded typical English stop words as well as frequently occurring domain-specific terms such as “study,” “result,” and “research.” The aim was to prioritize in-depth analysis over a more generalized examination. To standardize different word forms like -ing, -ed, and -s, we used lemmatization. The preprocessing stage concluded with the adoption of noun extraction as a standard text mining practice to augment semantic understanding.

Text Network Analysis

In text network analysis, words act as nodes, and their connections form edges, thereby enabling semantic analysis. In this study, we established a “co-occurrence” relationship among nouns present in the abstracts of scholarly articles, representing these relationships as edges in the network. Focusing on the specific keyword “metabolic_syndrome,” we constructed a network based on the frequency of word co-occurrence, limiting edges to instances where words appeared together at least twice. We also allocated higher weights to edges where word co-occurrence was repeated.

Our network construction resulted in a total of 1047 nodes and 34,377 edges. Using this foundational data, we evaluated the degree, closeness, and betweenness centrality for each node. Degree centrality quantifies the number of edges linked to a given node, thus indicating its direct connections to other words within the network. Closeness centrality is a measure of how quickly a node can reach all other nodes in the network, reflecting its proximity to a multitude of other terms. Betweenness centrality measures the frequency with which a node resides on the shortest paths between other nodes in the network, highlighting its function as a connector or bridge among words.

Given the substantial number of nodes and edges, the network inherently possesses the characteristics of a dense graph, complicating the task of visualization. To address this issue, we chose to visualize only the top 5% of nodes based on their degree centrality, which yielded 52 nodes, and focused our analysis on keywords strongly associated with “metabolic syndrome.” For both network construction and visualization, we used the Python library network to analyze the degree centralization index.

Topic Modeling

Topic modeling is a text mining technique for elucidating the inherent semantic structure of textual data. We performed topic modeling on a refined set of abstracts to uncover the latent themes within them. We included only abstracts in our analysis because topic modeling has been shown to be particularly effective with short texts [20]. Classical algorithms for this purpose include latent semantic analysis and latent Dirichlet allocation. These traditional methods rely on statistics-based word embeddings, which often ignore the order and relationships between words within the text. More advanced models, such as the combined topic model [21] and BERTopic [22], have recently been introduced for this task. In this study, we used the BERTopic model, which uses BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), a large language model, to perform semantic-based embeddings. BERT captures the contextual relationships between words by considering their order and entire sentence context through mechanisms like attention. This allows BERTopic to extract topics that are sensitive to the relationships between words, leading to more nuanced and contextually aware topic modeling. Our implementation was conducted using the BERTopic API (application programming interface) [23].

The BERTopic API is designed for topic modeling, leveraging BERT embeddings and clustering algorithms to extract coherent topics from textual data. It uses large language models like BERT to capture the semantic relationships between words and then applies techniques such as hierarchical density–based clustering of applications with noise for clustering and term frequency-inverse document frequency for keyword extraction. This combination allows BERTopic to generate interpretable topics that reflect the underlying themes in the data, making it a powerful tool for analyzing and understanding large text corpora. We used the “all-mpnet-base-v2” large language model, which has been fine-tuned on over a billion sentences and was chosen for its top performance in sentence embeddings [24]. Using BERTopic, we conducted topic analysis on a dataset comprising 162 abstracts, which led to the extraction of 13 distinct topics. Among these, 1 topic contained outlier values that presented challenges for semantic interpretation. To address this, we amalgamated the documents associated with this outlier topic into the nearest topic cluster, resulting in a final count of 12 topics. Each topic was represented by a set of words, which we closely examined along with the papers related to each topic to assign them appropriate names.


Core Keywords

A network comprising 1047 nodes (keywords) and 34,377 edges was constructed from the 162 abstracts. Table 1 presents the core keywords associated with MetS in the context of digital health care. The top 10 keywords, ranked by edge count, are as follows: “MetS” (817 edges), “use” (n=724), “patient” (n=644), “health” (n=610), “intervention” (n=555), “data” (n=536), “risk” (n=526), “group” (n=503), “increase” (n=483), and “application” (n=456). Figure 2 presents the 817 keywords that co-occur with “MetS,” which has the highest degree of centrality. The degree centrality of the keywords, in descending order, are: “MetS” (0.781), “use” (0.692), “patient” (0.616), “health” (0.583), “intervention” (0.531), “data” (0.512), “risk” (0.503), “group” (0.481), “increase” (0.463), and “application” (0.436). The closeness centrality measures for the keywords are: “MetS” (0.819), “use” (0.764), “patient” (0.721), “health” (0.705), “intervention” (0.680), “data” (0.671), “risk” (0.667), “group” (0.657), “increase” (0.650), and “application” (0.639). The betweenness centrality of the keywords, in descending order, are “MetS” (0.117), “use” (0.071), “patient” (0.066), “health” (0.042), “intervention” (0.034), “data” (0.034), “risk” (0.030), “group” (0.029), “increase” (0.024), and “application” (0.020).

Table 1. Core keywords in MetS research within digital health care.
RankKeywordsDegreeDegree centralityCloseness centralityBetweenness centrality
1MetS8170.7810.8190.117
2use7240.6920.7640.071
3patient6440.6160.7210.066
4health6100.5830.7050.042
5intervention5550.5310.6800.034
6data5360.5120.6710.034
7risk5260.5030.6670.030
8group5030.4810.6570.029
9increase4840.4630.6500.024
10application4560.4360.6390.020
11effect4440.4240.6340.018
12blood pressure4320.4130.6290.017
13disease4160.3980.6230.016
14diabetes4030.3850.6190.015
15factor3990.3810.6170.014
16care3950.3780.6160.013
17management3930.3760.6150.012
18year3910.3740.6140.012
19obesity3840.3670.6120.011
20body3760.3590.6090.011
21physical activity3760.3590.6090.010
22control3600.3440.6030.010
23change3480.3330.5990.009
24outcome3430.3280.5970.009
25population3410.3260.5970.009
Figure 2. Network of top 5% keywords based on degree centrality.

Text Network Analysis

Using the core keywords extracted from the abstracts, a text network analysis was conducted to visualize relationships among these core keywords. To enhance understanding of the keyword structure, we visualized the network of top keywords based on degree centrality, highlighting the top 5% of nodes (Figure 2). “MetS,” the keyword most frequently connected to others, occupied the central position within the network. Moreover, a network of core keywords was constructed by organizing keywords in proximity to “MetS” based on their frequency of co-occurrence with it (Figure 3). The top 5 keywords frequently co-occurring with “MetS” were “risk,” “patient,” “diabetes,” “intervention,” and “use.”

Figure 3. Network of core keywords related to MetS. MetS: metabolic syndrome.

Topic Modeling

Table 2 presents the distribution of keywords related to MetS in digital health care studies, organized by topic. Each topic was identified and labeled based on its associated keywords. Topic 1 constituted 19.8% of all articles and featured the top 10 keywords, in descending order of probability, as follows: “telehealth,” “diabetes,” “control,” “intervention,” “self-management,” “care,” “effect,” “group,” “type,” and “health.” Topic 1 was labeled “use of telehealth for self-management intervention of diabetes control.” Topic 2 comprised 14.2% of the total articles, with its top 10 keywords being “MetS,” “electronic health records,” “diabetes,” “patients,” “complication,” “risk,” “criterion,” “data,” “population,” and “model.” Topic 2 was labeled “use of EHR to manage MetS complications.” Topic 3, which accounted for 12.3% of all articles, was named “use of wearable devices for monitoring metabolic status.” The top 10 keywords for this topic included “device,” “wearable device,” “use,” “sensor,” “technology,” “monitoring,” “data,” “sit,” “disease,” and “review.” Topic 4 represented 10.5% of the articles and was labeled “use of apps for weight loss intervention.” Its top 10 keywords were “obesity,” “weight loss,” “intervention,” “program,” “health,” “body,” “application,” “weight,” “effect,” and “group.” Topic 5, making up 6.8% of the articles, was named “use of digital health for health-related behavior-changing intervention.” The top 10 keywords for this topic were “intervention,” “application,” “participant,” “hospitalization,” “care,” “change,” “m-health,” “trial,” “effect,” and “behavior.” Topic 6, accounting for 6.2% of all articles, was labeled “use of digital health to assess MetS status and trend during COVID-19.” Its top 10 keywords were “COVID-19,” “diabetes,” “MetS,” “patient,” “data,” “disease,” “health,” “disorder,” “incidence,” and “decrease.” Topic 7, constituting 7.4% of the articles, was named “use of digital health for blood pressure control with physical activity.” The top 10 keywords were “blood pressure,” “factor,” “group,” “physical activity,” “risk,” “MetS,” “child,” “measure,” “intervention,” and “adult.” Topic 8, also comprising 7.4% of the articles, was labeled “use of apps for engaging in physical activity.” The top 10 keywords for this topic were “physical activity,” “application,” “intervention,” “minute,” “body,” “engagement,” “week,” “user,” “effect,” and “woman.” Topic 9, accounting for 6.2% of the articles, was named “use of apps for access to data on individual metabolic status.” The top 10 keywords were “application,” “user,” “health,” “use,” “access,” “care,” “management,” “data,” “information,” and “feature.” Topic 10, representing 4.3% of all articles, was labeled “use of m-health for diabetes control.” Its top 10 keywords were “application,” “diabetes,” “smartphone,” “field,” “modification,” “HbA1c,” “review,” “use,” “control,” and “search.” Topics 11 and 12 each accounted for 2.5% of the articles. Topic 11 was named “use of digital health for management of metabolic status in women of child-bearing age,” and its top 10 keywords were “woman,” “pregnancy,” “feedback,” “health,” “pilot,” “intervention,” “program,” “delivery,” “interview,” and “factor.” Topic 12, labeled “use of digital health for management of lipid profile,” featured the top 10 keywords “lipid profile,” “patient,” “training,” “optimization,” “level,” “therapy,” “health care,” “coach,” “create,” and “metabolism.”

Table 2. Grouping of topics and high-ranking keywords.
Key wordsTopic 1Topic 2Topic 3Topic 4Topic 5Topic 6Topic 7Topic 8Topic 9Topic 10Topic 11Topic 12
1TelehealthMetSaDeviceObesityInterventionCOVID-19Blood pressurePhysical activityApplicationApplicationWomanLipid profile
2DiabetesEHRbWearable deviceWeight lossApplicationDiabetesFactorApplicationUserDiabetesPregnancyPatent
3ControlDiabetesUseInterventionParticipantMetSGroupInterventionHealthSmartphoneFeedbackTraining
4InterventionPatientsSensorProgramHospitalizationPatientPhysical activityMinuteUseFieldHealthOptimization
5Self-managementComplicationTechnologyHealthCareDataRiskBodyAccessModificationPilotLevel
6CareRiskMonitoringBodyChangeDiseaseMetSEngagementCareHbA1cInterventionTherapy
7EffectCriterionDataApplicationmHealthcHealthChildWeekManagementReviewProgramHealth care
8GroupDataSitWeightTrialDisorderMeasureUserDataUseDeliveryCoach
9TypePopulationDiseaseEffectEffectIncidenceInterventionEffectInformationControlInterviewCreate
10HealthModelReviewBehaviorBehaviorDecreaseAdultWomanFeatureSearchFactorMetabolism

aMetS: metabolic syndrome.

bEHR: electronic health records.

cmHealth: mobile health.

Topic Trend

Research into MetS within the context of digital health care began in 2003 and showed steady growth over time, with a substantial surge in publications observed after the onset of COVID-19. This trend was particularly notable between 2021 and 2022, when the number of related articles rose sharply from 20 to 43, reflecting heightened interest and activity in this field. In the early years, the focus of research was primarily on telemedicine and electronic medical records. However, the scope of studies has since broadened to include a wider array of topics, such as the development of intervention programs that leverage wearable devices and mobile apps to manage subjects’ metabolic status and promote their engagement in health-related behaviors. Moreover, beginning in 2020, research has increasingly targeted specific populations, including women of childbearing age. The emergence of COVID-19 also prompted investigations into the application of digital health care in remote scenarios necessitated by the pandemic (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Annual trend in topics. BP: blood pressure; EHR: electronic health record; MetS: metabolic syndrome; PA: physical activity.

Principal Results

Regarding key terms in the digital health care domain related to MetS, the following terms emerged as predominant: “MetS,” “use,” “patient,” “health,” “intervention,” “data,” “risk,” “group,” “increase,” “application,” and “effect.” Given that MetS was the focal point of our inquiry, it unsurprisingly ranked highest in both degree and centrality among the keywords. Our analysis further suggests that the primary research focus in this area involves the collection of data to verify the effectiveness of digital health interventions, particularly those delivered via apps targeting specific patient groups for MetS management. This observation was corroborated by text network analysis (Figures 2 and 3).

Additionally, an analysis of the number of relevant studies published annually revealed a noticeable increase in publications, particularly following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. While digital health care has been used for MetS management for several years, the COVID-19 crisis marked a significant turning point, enhancing both its accessibility and applicability. The term “COVID-19” itself became a key focus in topic 6 (Use of digital health to assess MetS status and trends during the COVID-19 pandemic), first emerging in the literature in 2020. Given these developments, we can reasonably anticipate an escalation in research activity surrounding MetS and digital health care applications in the coming years. This is particularly pertinent as the prevalence of MetS continues to rise, necessitating lifestyle alterations to mitigate or reverse such trends [1,25]. Moreover, as the digital health care field expands in tandem with technological advancements [7,26], we expect this upward trajectory to continue.

Furthermore, we observed a significant disparity in the representation of individual topics. Topic 1, which focuses on the use of telehealth for self-management in diabetes control, constitutes 19.8% of the studies. In contrast, topic 11, which explores the use of digital health for managing metabolic status in women of childbearing age, and topic 12, which centers on the use of digital health for lipid profile management, each make up only 2.5%. This distribution suggests that not all topics are equally represented in the literature. However, it is worth noting that topic 11 was first introduced in 2020 and topic 12 in 2016, making them relatively new areas of research. This may account for their lower representation. In comparison, topic 1 has been under consistent since 2003, indicating that the self-management of diabetes remains a long-standing primary concern in this field.

Some topics and their associated keywords align with the burgeoning field of precision medicine. Precision medicine aims to provide personalized care to each individual by focusing on the individual’s genomic structure and molecular biology. In this context, health care providers make medical decisions based on the unique characteristics of each individual rather than generalizing from average patients [27,28]. Given this focus, there is a growing need for intervention studies that target specific subjects, a need that is mirrored by the keywords identified in this study’s results. For example, topic 9 (Use of apps for access to data of individual metabolic status) centers on individuals’ metabolic status and emerged in the literature in 2014, with research ongoing through 2022. Keywords associated with topic 7 (Use of digital health for BP control with PA) include “child” and “adult,” while those for topic 8 (Use of apps for engaging in PA) feature the term “woman.” Topic 11 (Use of digital health for management of metabolic status in women of childbearing age) includes keywords like “woman,” “pregnancy,” and “delivery,” reflecting its focus on women who are pregnant or in the process of childbirth. This targeted research contributes incrementally to the developing knowledge base for tailored interventions, which aligns with the broader medical community’s emphasis on precision medicine. Nonetheless, given the small proportion of these topics, further research is essential because precision medicine relies on comprehensive population-level data to inform the selection of the most appropriate treatment for a given individual [27].

Limitations

This study presents some limitations that warrant attention. First, the dataset comprises a relatively small number of abstracts, which may impact the generalizability of the findings. To collect articles for use in our analysis, the topic search and category settings were retrieved on academic databases. It is possible that the data collected did not include all papers related to MetS in digital health care. Second, for the sake of clarity in interpretation, the analysis focused solely on nouns. The exclusion of other word types such as adjectives and adverbs may result in differing outcomes compared with analyses that consider all word types.

Conclusions

This study used topic modeling, a data-mining method, to extract salient topics related to MetS and digital health care. By analyzing historical research trends, the study aims to forecast and establish directions for future research endeavors. To this end, we systematically gathered all pertinent data from several academic databases, conducted data cleaning, implemented topic modeling, and undertook visualization and analysis of the results. This research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of MetS management within the context of digital health care and offers valuable insights for future researchers in this domain.

Acknowledgments

Funding for JK was provided by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Funding (grant NRF-2022R1A2C1002743).

Data Availability

The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' Contributions

JK designed and conceptualized the study. JK and YC were responsible for screening the eligibility of the abstracts included in the study. KL conducted data analysis and executed both the text network and topic modeling processes. KL, JK, and YC contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Search Strategy.

DOCX File , 20 KB

  1. Patlar Akbulut F, Ikitimur B, Akan A. Wearable sensor-based evaluation of psychosocial stress in patients with metabolic syndrome. Artif Intell Med. 2020;104:101824. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Greenfield DM, Snowden JA. Cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome. In: Carreras E, Dufour C, Mohty M, Kröger N, editors. The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. Cham. Springer; 2019:415-420.
  3. Expert Panel on Detection‚ Evaluation‚Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285(19):2486-2497. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Nilsson PM, Tuomilehto J, Rydén L. The metabolic syndrome - what is it and how should it be managed? Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(2_suppl):33-46. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Bae C, Kim BS, Cho K, Kim JH, Kim IH, Kim JH. Effects of customized digital health care service on metabolic syndrome status and lifestyle using a health care app: clinical trial. JMIR Form Res. 2023;7:e41427. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Iyawa GE, Herselman M, Botha A. Digital health innovation ecosystems: from systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Proc Comput Sci. 2016;100:244-252. [CrossRef]
  7. Anthony Jnr. B. Integrating telemedicine to support digital health care for the management of COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Healthcare Manage. 2021;14(1):280-289. [CrossRef]
  8. Lugones-Sanchez C, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Agudo-Conde C, Repiso-Gento I, G Adalia E, Ramirez-Manent JI, et al. EVIDENT 3 Investigators. Long-term effectiveness of a smartphone app combined with a smart band on weight loss, physical activity, and caloric intake in a population with overweight and obesity (Evident 3 Study): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(2):e30416. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Kirk MA, Amiri M, Pirbaglou M, Ritvo P. Wearable technology and physical activity behavior change in adults with chronic cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Health Promot. 2019;33(5):778-791. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Joshi A, Amadi C, Schumer H, Galitzdorfer L, Gaba A. A human centered approach to design a diet app for patients with metabolic syndrome. Mhealth. 2019;5:43. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. NA. Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. In: National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Committee on A Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease. Washington, DC. The National Academies Press; 2011.
  12. Beleigoli AM, Andrade AQ, Cançado AG, Paulo MN, Diniz MDFH, Ribeiro AL. Web-based digital health interventions for weight loss and lifestyle habit changes in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e298. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Eland-de Kok P, van Os-Medendorp H, Vergouwe-Meijer A, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Ros W. A systematic review of the effects of e-health on chronically ill patients. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(21-22):2997-3010. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Sequi-Dominguez I, Alvarez-Bueno C, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Fernandez-Rodriguez R, Del Saz Lara A, Cavero-Redondo I. Effectiveness of mobile health interventions promoting physical activity and lifestyle interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk among individuals with metabolic syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e17790. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Tully L, Burls A, Sorensen J, El-Moslemany R, O'Malley G. Mobile health for pediatric weight management: systematic scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(6):e16214. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Armstrong H, McCulloh I, Johnson A. Social Network Analysis With Applications. Hoboken, NJ. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
  17. Scott J. Social Network Analysis. London. Sage; 2017.
  18. Park JD. A study on issue tracking on multi-cultural studies using topic modeling. J Kor Soc Lib Inf Sci. 2019;53(3):273-289.
  19. kisleepublic/mets. GitHub. URL: https://github.com/kisleepublic/mets [accessed 2024-11-12]
  20. Sbalchiero S, Eder M. Topic modeling, long texts and the best number of topics. Some problems and solutions. Qual Quant. 2020;54(4):1095-1108. [CrossRef]
  21. Bianchi F, Terragni S, Hovy D. Pre-training is a hot topic: contextualized document embeddings improve topic coherence. arXiv:2004.03974. 2020. [CrossRef]
  22. Grootendorst M. BERTopic: neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv:2203.05794. 2022.
  23. BERTopic. GitHub. URL: https://maartengr.github.io/BERTopic/index.html [accessed 2024-11-12]
  24. SBert. Pretrained Models. SBert.net. URL: https://www.sbert.net/docs/pretrained_models.html [accessed 2024-11-12]
  25. Liang X, Or B, Tsoi MF, Cheung CL, Cheung BMY. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the United States national health and nutrition examination survey 2011-18. Postgrad Med J. 2023;99(1175):985-992. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Ekman B. Cost analysis of a digital health care model in Sweden. Pharmacoecon Open. 2018;2(3):347-354. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Johnson KB, Wei WQ, Weeraratne D, Frisse ME, Misulis K, Rhee K, et al. Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(1):86-93. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Ho D, Quake SR, McCabe ERB, Chng WJ, Chow EK, Ding X, et al. Enabling technologies for personalized and precision medicine. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(5):497-518. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


API: application programming interface
BERT: Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers
MetS: metabolic syndrome
PA: physical activity


Edited by T de Azevedo Cardoso; submitted 23.10.23; peer-reviewed by TAR Sure, M Ghayour-mobarhan, EJ Bae, J An; comments to author 10.07.24; revised version received 21.08.24; accepted 31.10.24; published 12.12.24.

Copyright

©Kiseong Lee, Yoongi Chung, Ji-Su Kim. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 12.12.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (ISSN 1438-8871), is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.