This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (1289) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (576) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (790)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/43883, first published .
Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review

Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review

Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Edwin Cohen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Bill Byrom2 Author Orcid Image ;   Anja Becher3 Author Orcid Image ;   Magnus Jörntén-Karlsson4 Author Orcid Image ;   Andrew K Mackenzie5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Corneli A, Starling S, Choi Y, Vosylius J, Madre L, Mackinnon A, Tenaerts P. Participant comprehension and acceptability of enhanced versus text-only electronic informed consent: an innovative qualitative pilot study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 2024;10(1) View
  2. Zhang D, Hu Z, Wu Z, Huang T, Huang T, Liu J, Sun H, Ba-Thein W. Compromised informed consent due to functional health literacy challenges in Chinese hospitals. BMC Medical Ethics 2024;25(1) View
  3. Ramsay D, Rathod V, Rashed S, Dassanayake S, Thavarajasingam S, Mendoza N, Rezaei Haddad A. Examining Introduction of E-consent in the Neurosurgical Caseload: Understanding the Barriers to Implementation. World Neurosurgery 2024;190:e983 View
  4. Xiong E, Bonner C, King A, Bourne Z, Morgan M, Tolosa X, Stanton T, Greaves K. Insights From the Development of a Dynamic Consent Platform for the Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) Program: Interview and Survey Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e57165 View