This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (787) Registered Report (560) User-centred Design Case Studies (596) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (851) Stroke (163) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (712) Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (3297)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/42556, first published .
Patients’ Perspectives Regarding Digital Health Technology to Support Self-management and Improve Integrated Stroke Care: Qualitative Interview Study

Patients’ Perspectives Regarding Digital Health Technology to Support Self-management and Improve Integrated Stroke Care: Qualitative Interview Study

Patients’ Perspectives Regarding Digital Health Technology to Support Self-management and Improve Integrated Stroke Care: Qualitative Interview Study

Authors of this article:

Esmee L S Bally1 Author Orcid Image ;   Demi Cheng1 Author Orcid Image ;   Amy van Grieken1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mireia Ferri Sanz2 Author Orcid Image ;   Oscar Zanutto3 Author Orcid Image ;   Aine Carroll4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Andrew Darley4 Author Orcid Image ;   Bob Roozenbeek6 Author Orcid Image ;   Diederik W J Dippel6 Author Orcid Image ;   Hein Raat1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Capecci M, Cima R, Barbini F, Mantoan A, Sernissi F, Lai S, Fava R, Tagliapietra L, Ascari L, Izzo R, Leombruni M, Casoli P, Hibel M, Ceravolo M. Telerehabilitation with ARC Intellicare to Cope with Motor and Respiratory Disabilities: Results about the Process, Usability, and Clinical Effect of the “Ricominciare” Pilot Study. Sensors 2023;23(16):7238 View
  2. van Grootel J, Collet R, Major M, Wiertsema S, van Dongen H, van der Leeden M, Geleijn E, Ostelo R, van der Schaaf M. Engaging patients in designing a transmural allied health pathway: A qualitative exploration of hospital‐to‐home transitions. Health Expectations 2024;27(2) View
  3. Kebede G, Gelaw A, Andualem H, Hailu A. Review of the characteristics of mobile robots for health care application. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications 2024;8(2):480 View
  4. Lazarou I, Krooupa A, Nikolopoulos S, Apostolidis L, Sarris N, Papadopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I. Cancer Patients’ Perspectives and Requirements of Digital Health Technologies: A Scoping Literature Review. Cancers 2024;16(13):2293 View
  5. Sia L, Sharma S, Ing J, Kumar S, Singh D. Physiotherapists’ perceptions, readiness, enablers, and barriers to use telerehabilitation: A scoping review. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2024;37(6):1441 View
  6. Zhang B. Research progress and intellectual structure of design for digital equity (DDE): A bibliometric analysis based on citespace. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024;11(1) View
  7. Clancy B, Bonevski B, English C, Guillaumier A. The Online Health Information–Seeking Behaviors of People Who Have Experienced Stroke: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e54827 View
  8. Silva G, Andrade J. Digital health in stroke: a narrative review. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 2024;82(08):001 View
  9. Mao Y, Bally E, Vasiljev V, Zanutto O, Cheng D, van Grieken A, Raat H. Incorporating Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to Improve Health and Social Care for Aging Communities: Communication Insights from the ValueCare Project. Communication Studies 2024;75(6):753 View
  10. Kaklamanou D, Nguyen L, Al-Abbadey M, Sangala N, Lewis R, Ayatollahi H. Attitudes towards digital health technology for the care of people with chronic kidney disease: A technology acceptance model exploration. PLOS Digital Health 2024;3(10):e0000614 View