This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Mobile Health (mhealth) (2939) Novel Sensors and Data Acquisition Methods in Cardiology (196) Cardiac Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation (84) Wearable Devices and Sensors (888) mHealth in a Clinical Setting (615) e-Cardiology and Telemonitoring in Cardiology (166) mHealth for Diagnosis (60) Development of Novel Medical Devices and Innovations for Existing Devices (80)

Published on in Vol 24, No 5 (2022): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/37970, first published .
Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study

Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study

Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study

Authors of this article:

Soonil Kwon1 Author Orcid Image ;   So-Ryoung Lee1 Author Orcid Image ;   Eue-Keun Choi1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Hyo-Jeong Ahn1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hee-Seok Song3 Author Orcid Image ;   Young-Shin Lee3 Author Orcid Image ;   Seil Oh1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Gregory Y H Lip1, 2, 4, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (16) Tweetations (6) Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.